162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37127575)
1. On the holobiont 'predictome' of immunocompetence in pigs.
Calle-García J; Ramayo-Caldas Y; Zingaretti LM; Quintanilla R; Ballester M; Pérez-Enciso M
Genet Sel Evol; 2023 May; 55(1):29. PubMed ID: 37127575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring methods to summarize gut microbiota composition for microbiability estimation and phenotypic prediction in swine.
He Y; Tiezzi F; Jiang J; Howard J; Huang Y; Gray K; Choi JW; Maltecca C
J Anim Sci; 2022 Sep; 100(9):. PubMed ID: 35775583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Opportunities and limits of combining microbiome and genome data for complex trait prediction.
Pérez-Enciso M; Zingaretti LM; Ramayo-Caldas Y; de Los Campos G
Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Aug; 53(1):65. PubMed ID: 34362312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Leveraging host-genetics and gut microbiota to determine immunocompetence in pigs.
Ramayo-Caldas Y; Zingaretti LM; Pérez-Pascual D; Alexandre PA; Reverter A; Dalmau A; Quintanilla R; Ballester M
Anim Microbiome; 2021 Oct; 3(1):74. PubMed ID: 34689834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Host Genome Influence on Gut Microbial Composition and Microbial Prediction of Complex Traits in Pigs.
Camarinha-Silva A; Maushammer M; Wellmann R; Vital M; Preuss S; Bennewitz J
Genetics; 2017 Jul; 206(3):1637-1644. PubMed ID: 28468904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microbiability and microbiome-wide association analyses of feed efficiency and performance traits in pigs.
Aliakbari A; Zemb O; Cauquil L; Barilly C; Billon Y; Gilbert H
Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Apr; 54(1):29. PubMed ID: 35468740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gut microbiota and host genetics contribute to the phenotypic variation of digestive and feed efficiency traits in growing pigs fed a conventional and a high fiber diet.
Déru V; Tiezzi F; Carillier-Jacquin C; Blanchet B; Cauquil L; Zemb O; Bouquet A; Maltecca C; Gilbert H
Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Jul; 54(1):55. PubMed ID: 35896976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting Growth and Carcass Traits in Swine Using Microbiome Data and Machine Learning Algorithms.
Maltecca C; Lu D; Schillebeeckx C; McNulty NP; Schwab C; Shull C; Tiezzi F
Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):6574. PubMed ID: 31024050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A gene co-association network regulating gut microbial communities in a Duroc pig population.
Reverter A; Ballester M; Alexandre PA; Mármol-Sánchez E; Dalmau A; Quintanilla R; Ramayo-Caldas Y
Microbiome; 2021 Feb; 9(1):52. PubMed ID: 33612109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microbiability of meat quality and carcass composition traits in swine.
Khanal P; Maltecca C; Schwab C; Fix J; Tiezzi F
J Anim Breed Genet; 2021 Mar; 138(2):223-236. PubMed ID: 32979243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exploring the areas of applicability of whole-genome prediction methods for Asian rice (Oryza sativa L.).
Onogi A; Ideta O; Inoshita Y; Ebana K; Yoshioka T; Yamasaki M; Iwata H
Theor Appl Genet; 2015 Jan; 128(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 25341369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Composition of the ileum microbiota is a mediator between the host genome and phosphorus utilization and other efficiency traits in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica).
Haas V; Vollmar S; Preuß S; Rodehutscord M; Camarinha-Silva A; Bennewitz J
Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Mar; 54(1):20. PubMed ID: 35260076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of Host Feeding Behavior and Gut Microbiome Data in Estimating Variance Components and Predicting Growth and Body Composition Traits in Swine.
He Y; Tiezzi F; Jiang J; Howard JT; Huang Y; Gray K; Choi JW; Maltecca C
Genes (Basel); 2022 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 35627152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SNP annotation-based whole genomic prediction and selection: an application to feed efficiency and its component traits in pigs.
Do DN; Janss LL; Jensen J; Kadarmideen HN
J Anim Sci; 2015 May; 93(5):2056-63. PubMed ID: 26020301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of genomic prediction of maternal traits in pigs using Bayesian variable selection methods.
Kjetså MV; Gjuvsland AB; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek E; Meuwissen T
J Anim Breed Genet; 2022 Nov; 139(6):654-665. PubMed ID: 35758628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genomic Prediction of Additive and Non-additive Effects Using Genetic Markers and Pedigrees.
de Almeida Filho JE; Guimarães JFR; Fonsceca E Silva F; Vilela de Resende MD; Muñoz P; Kirst M; de Resende Júnior MFR
G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Aug; 9(8):2739-2748. PubMed ID: 31263059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genome-wide prediction using Bayesian additive regression trees.
Waldmann P
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):42. PubMed ID: 27286957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genomic prediction in pigs using data from a commercial crossbred population: insights from the Duroc x (Landrace x Yorkshire) three-way crossbreeding system.
Liu S; Yao T; Chen D; Xiao S; Chen L; Zhang Z
Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Mar; 55(1):21. PubMed ID: 36977978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of genomic prediction using deregressed breeding values estimated from purebred and crossbred offspring phenotypes in pigs.
Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Veroneze R; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26440000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modeling heterogeneous (co)variances from adjacent-SNP groups improves genomic prediction for milk protein composition traits.
Gebreyesus G; Lund MS; Buitenhuis B; Bovenhuis H; Poulsen NA; Janss LG
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):89. PubMed ID: 29207947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
