BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37127683)

  • 41. Early Quality of Life Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy.
    Sarkaria IS; Rizk NP; Goldman DA; Sima C; Tan KS; Bains MS; Adusumilli PS; Molena D; Bott M; Atkinson T; Jones DR; Rusch VW
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Sep; 108(3):920-928. PubMed ID: 31026433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown's esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive approaches.
    Kulkarni A; Mulchandani JG; Sadat MS; Shetty N; Shetty S; Kumar MP; Kudari A
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1289-1297. PubMed ID: 35044671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Worldwide Techniques and Outcomes in Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE): Results From the Multicenter International Registry.
    Kingma BF; Grimminger PP; van der Sluis PC; van Det MJ; Kouwenhoven EA; Chao YK; Tsai CY; Fuchs HF; Bruns CJ; Sarkaria IS; Luketich JD; Haveman JW; Etten BV; Chiu PW; Chan SM; Rouanet P; Mourregot A; Hölzen JP; Sallum RA; Cecconello I; Egberts JH; Benedix F; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Perez D; Jansen K; Hubka M; Low DE; Biebl M; Pratschke J; Turner P; Pursnani K; Chaudry A; Smith M; Mazza E; Strignano P; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R;
    Ann Surg; 2022 Nov; 276(5):e386-e392. PubMed ID: 33177354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. End to side circular stapled anastomosis during robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).
    Capovilla G; Hadzijusufovic E; Tagkalos E; Froiio C; Berlth F; Mann C; Staubitz J; Uzun E; Lang H; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2022 Aug; 35(8):. PubMed ID: 34979549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A structured training pathway to implement robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: the learning curve results from a high-volume center.
    Kingma BF; Hadzijusufovic E; Van der Sluis PC; Bano E; Lang H; Ruurda JP; Hillegersberg van R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Nov; 33(Supplement_2):. PubMed ID: 33241300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis and McKeown oesophagectomy in Chinese patients with stage IA-IIIB oesophageal squamous cell cancer: a multicentre, non-interventional and observational study.
    Zhang T; Hou X; Li Y; Fu X; Liu L; Xu L; Liu Y
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 30(6):812-819. PubMed ID: 32285107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
    Biere SS; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Maas KW; Bonavina L; Rosman C; Garcia JR; Gisbertz SS; Klinkenbijl JH; Hollmann MW; de Lange ES; Bonjer HJ; van der Peet DL; Cuesta MA
    Lancet; 2012 May; 379(9829):1887-92. PubMed ID: 22552194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Minimally invasive techniques for transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Siaw-Acheampong K; Kamarajah SK; Gujjuri R; Bundred JR; Singh P; Griffiths EA
    BJS Open; 2020 Oct; 4(5):787-803. PubMed ID: 32894001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer: a single center experience.
    Giacopuzzi S; Weindelmayer J; Treppiedi E; Bencivenga M; Ceola M; Priolo S; Carlini M; de Manzoni G
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Apr; 30(4):1-6. PubMed ID: 28375472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. McKeown esophagectomy: robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive technique-systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhou J; Xu J; Chen L; Hu J; Shu Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2022 Oct; 35(10):. PubMed ID: 35373248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A systematic review.
    Ruurda JP; van der Sluis PC; van der Horst S; van Hilllegersberg R
    J Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 112(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 26390285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Weksler B; Sharma P; Moudgill N; Chojnacki KA; Rosato EL
    Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 21899652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Outcomes of robotic versus non-robotic minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: An American College of Surgeons NSQIP database analysis.
    Harbison GJ; Vossler JD; Yim NH; Murayama KM
    Am J Surg; 2019 Dec; 218(6):1223-1228. PubMed ID: 31500797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
    Tan Z; Zhang X; Wang X; Fu J
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):995-998. PubMed ID: 27680066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Minimally invasive surgery for oesophageal cancer.
    Anderegg MC; Gisbertz SS; van Berge Henegouwen MI
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 24485254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Progress in the application of robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy].
    Guo XF; Li ZG
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 56(4):312-315. PubMed ID: 29562419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
    Weksler B; Sullivan JL
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparative outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-weighted analysis.
    Yun JK; Chong BK; Kim HJ; Lee IS; Gong CS; Kim BS; Lee GD; Choi S; Kim HR; Kim DK; Park SI; Kim YH
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 May; 33(5):. PubMed ID: 31665266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Robotic Esophagectomy Trends and Early Surgical Outcomes: The US Experience.
    Khaitan PG; Vekstein AM; Thibault D; Kosinski A; Hartwig MG; Block M; Gaissert H; Wolf AS
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2023 Mar; 115(3):710-717. PubMed ID: 36470561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Two-Year Quality of Life Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy.
    Vimolratana M; Sarkaria IS; Goldman DA; Rizk NP; Tan KS; Bains MS; Adusumilli PS; Sihag S; Isbell JM; Huang J; Park BJ; Molena D; Rusch VW; Jones DR; Bott MJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Sep; 112(3):880-889. PubMed ID: 33157056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.