BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37128989)

  • 1. Developing an Evolutionary Baseline Model for Humans: Jointly Inferring Purifying Selection with Population History.
    Johri P; Pfeifer SP; Jensen JD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2023 May; 40(5):. PubMed ID: 37128989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing an evolutionary baseline model for humans: jointly inferring purifying selection with population history.
    Johri P; Pfeifer SP; Jensen JD
    bioRxiv; 2023 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 37090533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toward an Evolutionarily Appropriate Null Model: Jointly Inferring Demography and Purifying Selection.
    Johri P; Charlesworth B; Jensen JD
    Genetics; 2020 May; 215(1):173-192. PubMed ID: 32152045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Impact of Purifying and Background Selection on the Inference of Population History: Problems and Prospects.
    Johri P; Riall K; Becher H; Excoffier L; Charlesworth B; Jensen JD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Jun; 38(7):2986-3003. PubMed ID: 33591322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal challenges in detecting balancing selection from population genomic data.
    Soni V; Jensen JD
    G3 (Bethesda); 2024 Jun; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 38551137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human demographic history has amplified the effects of background selection across the genome.
    Torres R; Szpiech ZA; Hernandez RD
    PLoS Genet; 2018 Jun; 14(6):e1007387. PubMed ID: 29912945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An approximate bayesian estimator suggests strong, recurrent selective sweeps in Drosophila.
    Jensen JD; Thornton KR; Andolfatto P
    PLoS Genet; 2008 Sep; 4(9):e1000198. PubMed ID: 18802463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic inference using diffusion models and the allele frequency spectrum.
    Ragsdale AP; Moreau C; Gravel S
    Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2018 Dec; 53():140-147. PubMed ID: 30366252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human genetic differentiation across the Strait of Gibraltar.
    Currat M; Poloni ES; Sanchez-Mazas A
    BMC Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 10():237. PubMed ID: 20682051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Background selection and biased gene conversion affect more than 95% of the human genome and bias demographic inferences.
    Pouyet F; Aeschbacher S; Thiéry A; Excoffier L
    Elife; 2018 Aug; 7():. PubMed ID: 30125248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inferring Demography and Selection in Organisms Characterized by Skewed Offspring Distributions.
    Sackman AM; Harris RB; Jensen JD
    Genetics; 2019 Mar; 211(3):1019-1028. PubMed ID: 30651284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identifying loci under selection via explicit demographic models.
    Luqman H; Widmer A; Fior S; Wegmann D
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Nov; 21(8):2719-2737. PubMed ID: 33964107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian inference of selection in a heterogeneous environment from genetic time-series data.
    Gompert Z
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(1):121-34. PubMed ID: 26184577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Impact of Selection, Gene Conversion, and Biased Sampling on the Assessment of Microbial Demography.
    Lapierre M; Blin C; Lambert A; Achaz G; Rocha EP
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Jul; 33(7):1711-25. PubMed ID: 26931140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential Effect of Selection against LINE Retrotransposons among Vertebrates Inferred from Whole-Genome Data and Demographic Modeling.
    Xue AT; Ruggiero RP; Hickerson MJ; Boissinot S
    Genome Biol Evol; 2018 Apr; 10(5):1265-1281. PubMed ID: 29688421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Population Genomics on the Fly: Recent Advances in Drosophila.
    Haudry A; Laurent S; Kapun M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2090():357-396. PubMed ID: 31975175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determinants of the Efficacy of Natural Selection on Coding and Noncoding Variability in Two Passerine Species.
    Corcoran P; Gossmann TI; Barton HJ; ; Slate J; Zeng K
    Genome Biol Evol; 2017 Nov; 9(11):2987-3007. PubMed ID: 29045655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effects of Mutation and Recombination Rate Heterogeneity on the Inference of Demography and the Distribution of Fitness Effects.
    Soni V; Pfeifer SP; Jensen JD
    Genome Biol Evol; 2024 Feb; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 38207127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Heterogeneity in effective size across the genome: effects on the inverse instantaneous coalescence rate (IICR) and implications for demographic inference under linked selection.
    Boitard S; Arredondo A; Chikhi L; Mazet O
    Genetics; 2022 Mar; 220(3):. PubMed ID: 35100421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A general population genetic framework for antagonistic selection that accounts for demography and recurrent mutation.
    Connallon T; Clark AG
    Genetics; 2012 Apr; 190(4):1477-89. PubMed ID: 22298707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.