159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37129301)
1. The effect of breast shielding outside the field of view on breast entrance surface dose in axial X-ray examinations: a phantom study.
Hurley L; Alashban Y; Albeshan S; England A; McEntee MF
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2023 May; 29(3):555-560. PubMed ID: 37129301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DETERMINATION OF ENTRANCE SURFACE DOSE FOR THREE COMMON PLANAR DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS.
Jeyasugiththan J; Ehalagasthanna GPNT; Hishaam U; Satharasinghe DM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2022 Oct; 198(18):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 36037526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lead-rubber shielding effect on radiation dose to the gonads from a bilateral hand X-ray examination.
Welborn D; Lockwood P
Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):360-365. PubMed ID: 35000868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gridless adult cervical spine radiography and its' effect on image quality and radiation dose: A phantom study.
Mekis N; Bianchi T; Doyle C; Gauchat M; Geerling I; Linneman J; Staats S; Campeanu C
Radiography (Lond); 2024 Jan; 30(1):359-366. PubMed ID: 38141429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of breast shielding during lumbar spine radiography.
Mekis N; Zontar D; Skrk D
Radiol Oncol; 2013 Mar; 47(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 23450158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of Breast and Eye Shielding During Cervical Spine Radiography: An Experimental Study.
Elshami W; Abuzaid MM; Tekin HO
Risk Manag Healthc Policy; 2020; 13():697-704. PubMed ID: 32636688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of six phantoms for entrance skin dose evaluation in 11 standard X-ray examinations.
Compagnone G; Pagan L; Bergamini C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2005; 6(1):101-13. PubMed ID: 15770201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical application of the optimized X-ray parameter model through analysis of disease risk and image quality when combining the ion chamber of automatic exposure control of digital radiography.
Hwang JH; Kim SB; Choi MK; Lee KB; Park CK
J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(6):1099-1114. PubMed ID: 36120755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of entrance surface dose in general radiographies using body mass index classification.
Matsumoto M; Ota S; Inoue S; Ogata Y; Yamamoto S; Ueguchi T; Johkoh T
Igaku Butsuri; 2003; 23(4):232-42. PubMed ID: 15073419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing the standard knee X-ray exposure factor, 10 kV rule, and modified 10 kV rule techniques in digital radiography to reduce patient radiation dose without loss of image quality.
Wenman A; Lockwood P
Radiography (Lond); 2024 Mar; 30(2):574-581. PubMed ID: 38295494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Portable TL dosemeter--ESD phantom combination for chest and lumbar spine radiography.
Niittymäki H; Hakanen A; Rautio S; Järvinen H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(2):224-7. PubMed ID: 18204082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of Entrance Skin Dose and Calculation of Effective Dose for Common Diagnostic X-Ray Examinations in Kashan, Iran.
Aliasgharzadeh A; Mihandoost E; Masoumbeigi M; Salimian M; Mohseni M
Glob J Health Sci; 2015 Feb; 7(5):202-7. PubMed ID: 26156930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of Pediatrics Radiation Dose from Routine X-Ray Examination at Jimma University Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia.
Zewdu M; Kadir E; Berhane M
Ethiop J Health Sci; 2017 Sep; 27(5):481-490. PubMed ID: 29217953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of x-ray tube potential on image quality and patient dose for lumbar spine computed radiography examinations.
Brindhaban A; Al Khalifah K; Al Wathiqi G; Al Ostath H
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Dec; 28(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 16506618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A pilot study investigating two dose reduction techniques for AP lumbar spine radiography using direct dosimetry and Projection VR.
Shanahan MC
Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):222-228. PubMed ID: 28687290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose absorption in lumbar and femoral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry examinations using three different scan modalities: an anthropomorphic phantom study.
Bandirali M; Lanza E; Messina C; Sconfienza LM; Brambilla R; Maurizio R; Marchelli D; Piodi LP; Di Leo G; Ulivieri FM; Sardanelli F
J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(3):279-282. PubMed ID: 23535250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Entrance surface dose of the common radiological investigations in Abuth, Zaria.
Nwokorie E; Akpa TC; Mallam OP; Akpan E; Ibinaye PO; Obiako OR; Nzotta C; Ugwu AC
East Afr J Public Health; 2011 Sep; 8(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 23120957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Entrance doses during lateral lumbar spine and antero-posterior abdomen examinations: generator waveform dependence.
Morrison GD; Underwood AC
Br J Radiol; 1995 May; 68(809):491-4. PubMed ID: 7788234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating pediatric entrance skin dose from digital radiography examination using DICOM metadata: A quality assurance tool.
Brady SL; Kaufman RA
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2489-97. PubMed ID: 25979042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of Eye and Breast Shielding on Organ Doses During Cervical Spine Radiography: Design and Validation of MIRD Computational Phantom.
Elshami W; Tekin HO; Issa SAM; Abuzaid MM; Zakaly HMH; Issa B; Ene A
Front Public Health; 2021; 9():751577. PubMed ID: 34746086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
