These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37129301)
1. The effect of breast shielding outside the field of view on breast entrance surface dose in axial X-ray examinations: a phantom study. Hurley L; Alashban Y; Albeshan S; England A; McEntee MF Diagn Interv Radiol; 2023 May; 29(3):555-560. PubMed ID: 37129301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DETERMINATION OF ENTRANCE SURFACE DOSE FOR THREE COMMON PLANAR DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS. Jeyasugiththan J; Ehalagasthanna GPNT; Hishaam U; Satharasinghe DM Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2022 Oct; 198(18):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 36037526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lead-rubber shielding effect on radiation dose to the gonads from a bilateral hand X-ray examination. Welborn D; Lockwood P Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):360-365. PubMed ID: 35000868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gridless adult cervical spine radiography and its' effect on image quality and radiation dose: A phantom study. Mekis N; Bianchi T; Doyle C; Gauchat M; Geerling I; Linneman J; Staats S; Campeanu C Radiography (Lond); 2024 Jan; 30(1):359-366. PubMed ID: 38141429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of breast shielding during lumbar spine radiography. Mekis N; Zontar D; Skrk D Radiol Oncol; 2013 Mar; 47(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 23450158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of Breast and Eye Shielding During Cervical Spine Radiography: An Experimental Study. Elshami W; Abuzaid MM; Tekin HO Risk Manag Healthc Policy; 2020; 13():697-704. PubMed ID: 32636688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of six phantoms for entrance skin dose evaluation in 11 standard X-ray examinations. Compagnone G; Pagan L; Bergamini C J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2005; 6(1):101-13. PubMed ID: 15770201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical application of the optimized X-ray parameter model through analysis of disease risk and image quality when combining the ion chamber of automatic exposure control of digital radiography. Hwang JH; Kim SB; Choi MK; Lee KB; Park CK J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(6):1099-1114. PubMed ID: 36120755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of entrance surface dose in general radiographies using body mass index classification. Matsumoto M; Ota S; Inoue S; Ogata Y; Yamamoto S; Ueguchi T; Johkoh T Igaku Butsuri; 2003; 23(4):232-42. PubMed ID: 15073419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Portable TL dosemeter--ESD phantom combination for chest and lumbar spine radiography. Niittymäki H; Hakanen A; Rautio S; Järvinen H Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(2):224-7. PubMed ID: 18204082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the standard knee X-ray exposure factor, 10 kV rule, and modified 10 kV rule techniques in digital radiography to reduce patient radiation dose without loss of image quality. Wenman A; Lockwood P Radiography (Lond); 2024 Mar; 30(2):574-581. PubMed ID: 38295494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of Entrance Skin Dose and Calculation of Effective Dose for Common Diagnostic X-Ray Examinations in Kashan, Iran. Aliasgharzadeh A; Mihandoost E; Masoumbeigi M; Salimian M; Mohseni M Glob J Health Sci; 2015 Feb; 7(5):202-7. PubMed ID: 26156930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of Pediatrics Radiation Dose from Routine X-Ray Examination at Jimma University Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. Zewdu M; Kadir E; Berhane M Ethiop J Health Sci; 2017 Sep; 27(5):481-490. PubMed ID: 29217953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of x-ray tube potential on image quality and patient dose for lumbar spine computed radiography examinations. Brindhaban A; Al Khalifah K; Al Wathiqi G; Al Ostath H Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Dec; 28(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 16506618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A pilot study investigating two dose reduction techniques for AP lumbar spine radiography using direct dosimetry and Projection VR. Shanahan MC Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):222-228. PubMed ID: 28687290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose absorption in lumbar and femoral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry examinations using three different scan modalities: an anthropomorphic phantom study. Bandirali M; Lanza E; Messina C; Sconfienza LM; Brambilla R; Maurizio R; Marchelli D; Piodi LP; Di Leo G; Ulivieri FM; Sardanelli F J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(3):279-282. PubMed ID: 23535250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Entrance surface dose of the common radiological investigations in Abuth, Zaria. Nwokorie E; Akpa TC; Mallam OP; Akpan E; Ibinaye PO; Obiako OR; Nzotta C; Ugwu AC East Afr J Public Health; 2011 Sep; 8(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 23120957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating pediatric entrance skin dose from digital radiography examination using DICOM metadata: A quality assurance tool. Brady SL; Kaufman RA Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2489-97. PubMed ID: 25979042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of Eye and Breast Shielding on Organ Doses During Cervical Spine Radiography: Design and Validation of MIRD Computational Phantom. Elshami W; Tekin HO; Issa SAM; Abuzaid MM; Zakaly HMH; Issa B; Ene A Front Public Health; 2021; 9():751577. PubMed ID: 34746086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]