188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37129490)
1. Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance.
Dratsch T; Chen X; Rezazade Mehrizi M; Kloeckner R; Mähringer-Kunz A; Püsken M; Baeßler B; Sauer S; Maintz D; Pinto Dos Santos D
Radiology; 2023 May; 307(4):e222176. PubMed ID: 37129490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. External Evaluation of 3 Commercial Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms.
Salim M; Wåhlin E; Dembrower K; Azavedo E; Foukakis T; Liu Y; Smith K; Eklund M; Strand F
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Oct; 6(10):1581-1588. PubMed ID: 32852536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection Software for Automated Breast Ultrasound.
Kwon MR; Youn I; Lee MY; Lee HA
Acad Radiol; 2024 Feb; 31(2):480-491. PubMed ID: 37813703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BI-RADS Category Assignments by GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Google Bard: A Multilanguage Study.
Cozzi A; Pinker K; Hidber A; Zhang T; Bonomo L; Lo Gullo R; Christianson B; Curti M; Rizzo S; Del Grande F; Mann RM; Schiaffino S
Radiology; 2024 Apr; 311(1):e232133. PubMed ID: 38687216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of a Categorical AI System for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Interpretation by Both General Radiologists and Breast Imaging Specialists.
Kim JG; Haslam B; Diab AR; Sakhare A; Grisot G; Lee H; Holt J; Lee CI; Lotter W; Sorensen AG
Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 Mar; 6(2):e230137. PubMed ID: 38323914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Population-wide evaluation of artificial intelligence and radiologist assessment of screening mammograms.
Kühl J; Elhakim MT; Stougaard SW; Rasmussen BSB; Nielsen M; Gerke O; Larsen LB; Graumann O
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3935-3946. PubMed ID: 37938386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in screening mammography in Sweden: a prospective, population-based, paired-reader, non-inferiority study.
Dembrower K; Crippa A; Colón E; Eklund M; Strand F;
Lancet Digit Health; 2023 Oct; 5(10):e703-e711. PubMed ID: 37690911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving mammography interpretation for both novice and experienced readers: a comparative study of two commercial artificial intelligence software.
Kim HJ; Choi WJ; Gwon HY; Jang SJ; Chae EY; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim HH
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3924-3934. PubMed ID: 37938383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial intelligence as diagnostic aiding tool in cases of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3: the results of retrospective multi-center cohort study.
Wang K; Xing Z; Kong Z; Yu Y; Chen Y; Zhao X; Song B; Wang X; Wu P; Wang X; Xue Y
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Dec; 48(12):3757-3765. PubMed ID: 37740046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial Intelligence in BI-RADS Categorization of Breast Lesions on Ultrasound: Can We Omit Excessive Follow-ups and Biopsies?
Guldogan N; Taskin F; Icten GE; Yilmaz E; Turk EB; Erdemli S; Parlakkilic UT; Turkoglu O; Aribal E
Acad Radiol; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38087719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying normal mammograms in a large screening population using artificial intelligence.
Lång K; Dustler M; Dahlblom V; Åkesson A; Andersson I; Zackrisson S
Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1687-1692. PubMed ID: 32876835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective assessment of breast lesions AI classification model based on ultrasound dynamic videos and ACR BI-RADS characteristics.
Qiu S; Zhuang S; Li B; Wang J; Zhuang Z
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1274557. PubMed ID: 38023255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early Indicators of the Impact of Using AI in Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer.
Lauritzen AD; Lillholm M; Lynge E; Nielsen M; Karssemeijer N; Vejborg I
Radiology; 2024 Jun; 311(3):e232479. PubMed ID: 38832880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deep learning performance for detection and classification of microcalcifications on mammography.
Pesapane F; Trentin C; Ferrari F; Signorelli G; Tantrige P; Montesano M; Cicala C; Virgoli R; D'Acquisto S; Nicosia L; Origgi D; Cassano E
Eur Radiol Exp; 2023 Nov; 7(1):69. PubMed ID: 37934382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Familiarity, confidence and preference of artificial intelligence feedback and prompts by Australian breast cancer screening readers.
Trieu PDY; Barron ML; Jiang Z; Tavakoli Taba S; Gandomkar Z; Lewis SJ
Aust Health Rev; 2024 Jun; 48(3):299-311. PubMed ID: 38692648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reader bias in breast cancer screening related to cancer prevalence and artificial intelligence decision support-a reader study.
Al-Bazzaz H; Janicijevic M; Strand F
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38165430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. AI for interpreting screening mammograms: implications for missed cancer in double reading practices and challenging-to-locate lesions.
Jiang Z; Gandomkar Z; Trieu PDY; Taba ST; Barron ML; Lewis SJ
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):11893. PubMed ID: 38789575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description.
Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Deep Learning Decision Support Tool to Improve Risk Stratification and Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies in BI-RADS 4 Mammograms.
Ezeana CF; He T; Patel TA; Kaklamani V; Elmi M; Brigmon E; Otto PM; Kist KA; Speck H; Wang L; Ensor J; Shih YT; Kim B; Pan IW; Cohen AL; Kelley K; Spak D; Yang WT; Chang JC; Wong STC
Radiol Artif Intell; 2023 Nov; 5(6):e220259. PubMed ID: 38074778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammographic density assessment: comparison of radiologists, automated volumetric measurement, and artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis.
Eom HJ; Cha JH; Choi WJ; Cho SM; Jin K; Kim HH
Acta Radiol; 2024 Jun; ():2841851241257794. PubMed ID: 38825883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
