164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37129492)
1. Toward AI-supported US Triage of Women with Palpable Breast Lumps in a Low-Resource Setting.
Berg WA; López Aldrete AL; Jairaj A; Ledesma Parea JC; García CY; McClennan RC; Cen SY; Larsen LH; de Lara MTS; Love S
Radiology; 2023 May; 307(4):e223351. PubMed ID: 37129492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Palpable Breast Lump Triage by Minimally Trained Operators in Mexico Using Computer-Assisted Diagnosis and Low-Cost Ultrasound.
Love SM; Berg WA; Podilchuk C; López Aldrete AL; Gaxiola Mascareño AP; Pathicherikollamparambil K; Sankarasubramanian A; Eshraghi L; Mammone R
J Glob Oncol; 2018 Aug; 4():1-9. PubMed ID: 30156946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of radiomics on the breast ultrasound radiologist's clinical practice: From lumpologist to data wrangler.
Fleury EFC; Marcomini K
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 131():109197. PubMed ID: 32795725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Pivotal Study of Optoacoustic Imaging to Diagnose Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A New Evaluation Tool for Radiologists.
Neuschler EI; Butler R; Young CA; Barke LD; Bertrand ML; Böhm-Vélez M; Destounis S; Donlan P; Grobmyer SR; Katzen J; Kist KA; Lavin PT; Makariou EV; Parris TM; Schilling KJ; Tucker FL; Dogan BE
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 29178816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. US as the Primary Imaging Modality in the Evaluation of Palpable Breast Masses in Breastfeeding Women, Including Those of Advanced Maternal Age.
Chung M; Hayward JH; Woodard GA; Knobel A; Greenwood HI; Ray KM; Joe BN; Lee AY
Radiology; 2020 Nov; 297(2):316-324. PubMed ID: 32870133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An artificial intelligence system using maximum intensity projection MR images facilitates classification of non-mass enhancement breast lesions.
Wang L; Chang L; Luo R; Cui X; Liu H; Wu H; Chen Y; Zhang Y; Wu C; Li F; Liu H; Guan W; Wang D
Eur Radiol; 2022 Jul; 32(7):4857-4867. PubMed ID: 35258676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.
Berg WA; Cosgrove DO; Doré CJ; Schäfer FK; Svensson WE; Hooley RJ; Ohlinger R; Mendelson EB; Balu-Maestro C; Locatelli M; Tourasse C; Cavanaugh BC; Juhan V; Stavros AT; Tardivon A; Gay J; Henry JP; Cohen-Bacrie C;
Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):435-49. PubMed ID: 22282182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple bilateral circumscribed masses at screening breast US: consider annual follow-up.
Berg WA; Zhang Z; Cormack JB; Mendelson EB
Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):673-83. PubMed ID: 23616634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Artificial Intelligence Decision Support Using Deep Learning on Breast Cancer Screening Interpretation with Single-View Wide-Angle Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Pinto MC; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Pedersen K; Hofvind S; Wicklein J; Kappler S; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I
Radiology; 2021 Sep; 300(3):529-536. PubMed ID: 34227882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a clinical decision rule for triage of women with palpable breast masses.
Reeves MJ; Osuch JR; Pathak DR
J Clin Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 56(7):636-45. PubMed ID: 12921932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Artificial Intelligence Applied to Breast MRI for Improved Diagnosis.
Jiang Y; Edwards AV; Newstead GM
Radiology; 2021 Jan; 298(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 33078996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.
Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Ljung BM; Grady D
Ann Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 139(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 12965983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A combined ultrasonic B-mode and color Doppler system for the classification of breast masses using neural network.
Qian X; Zhang B; Liu S; Wang Y; Chen X; Liu J; Yang Y; Chen X; Wei Y; Xiao Q; Ma J; Shung KK; Zhou Q; Liu L; Chen Z
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):3023-3033. PubMed ID: 32006174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing Breast Cancer Risk by Combining AI for Lesion Detection and Mammographic Texture.
Lauritzen AD; von Euler-Chelpin MC; Lynge E; Vejborg I; Nielsen M; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M
Radiology; 2023 Aug; 308(2):e230227. PubMed ID: 37642571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation.
Rahbar G; Sie AC; Hansen GC; Prince JS; Melany ML; Reynolds HE; Jackson VP; Sayre JW; Bassett LW
Radiology; 1999 Dec; 213(3):889-94. PubMed ID: 10580971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Bailey J; Nees AV; Blane C
Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):716-24. PubMed ID: 17244717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiple Bilateral Circumscribed Masses at Screening Breast Ultrasound: Outcomes of New or Enlarging Masses at Follow-Up.
Wolfson S; Heller SL; Gao Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Mar; 218(3):435-443. PubMed ID: 34549605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cysts within Otherwise Probably Benign Solid Breast Masses and the Risk of Malignancy.
Jales RM; Araujo KG; Sarian LO; Serra KP; Keppke H; Francisco J; Derchain SF
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 38(4):170-6. PubMed ID: 27093646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Critical review of 215 cases of non-palpable mammary lesions].
Pastore G; Marano P; Romani M; Costantini M; Belli P
Radiol Med; 1999 May; 97(5):344-8. PubMed ID: 10432964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
