These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37129748)

  • 1. Epistemic and Non-epistemic Values in Earthquake Engineering.
    Zanetti L; Chiffi D; Petrini L
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2023 May; 29(3):18. PubMed ID: 37129748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Earthquake hazard and risk analysis for natural and induced seismicity: towards objective assessments in the face of uncertainty.
    Bommer JJ
    Bull Earthq Eng; 2022; 20(6):2825-3069. PubMed ID: 35474945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of non-epistemic values in engineering models.
    Diekmann S; Peterson M
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2013 Mar; 19(1):207-18. PubMed ID: 21822897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Epistemology for interdisciplinary research - shifting philosophical paradigms of science.
    Boon M; Van Baalen S
    Eur J Philos Sci; 2019; 9(1):16. PubMed ID: 30873248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distributing epistemic and practical risks: a comparative study of communicating earthquake damages.
    Yu LA
    Synthese; 2022; 200(5):360. PubMed ID: 36032353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does environmental science crowd out non-epistemic values?
    Gillette K; Inkpen SA; DesRoches CT
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2021 Jun; 87():81-92. PubMed ID: 34111825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Value-entanglement and the integrity of scientific research.
    Resnik DB; Elliott KC
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2019 Jun; 75():1-11. PubMed ID: 31426942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.
    Page RA; Joyner WB; Blume JA
    Science; 1975 Aug; 189(4203):601-8. PubMed ID: 17838741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Philosophical import of non-epistemic values in clinical trials and data interpretation.
    Varghese J
    Hist Philos Life Sci; 2019 Mar; 41(2):14. PubMed ID: 30900061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Epistemic interests and the objectivity of inquiry.
    Wilholt T
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2022 Feb; 91():86-93. PubMed ID: 34891050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When one model is not enough: combining epistemic tools in systems biology.
    Green S
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Jun; 44(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 23578487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An engineering paradigm in the biomedical sciences: Knowledge as epistemic tool.
    Boon M
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2017 Oct; 129():25-39. PubMed ID: 28389261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Value management and model pluralism in climate science.
    Jebeile J; Crucifix M
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2021 Aug; 88():120-127. PubMed ID: 34166920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The benefits of acquiring interactional expertise: Why (some) philosophers of science should engage scientific communities.
    Plaisance KS
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2020 Oct; 83():53-62. PubMed ID: 32958281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Irrelevance of the Risk-Uncertainty Distinction.
    Roser D
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Oct; 23(5):1387-1407. PubMed ID: 28597223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The epistemic and aleatory uncertainties of the ETAS-type models: an application to the Central Italy seismicity.
    Lombardi AM
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11812. PubMed ID: 28924175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of scenario ensembles for deriving seismic risk.
    Robinson TR; Rosser NJ; Densmore AL; Oven KJ; Shrestha SN; Guragain R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Oct; 115(41):E9532-E9541. PubMed ID: 30249653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Was Sir William Crookes epistemically virtuous?
    Kidd IJ
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2014 Dec; 48 Pt A():67-74. PubMed ID: 25091260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact Assessment of the M
    Wang C; Hu X; Hu K; Liu S; Zhong W
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(22):. PubMed ID: 36433472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When do non-epistemic values play an epistemically illegitimate role in science? How to solve one half of the new demarcation problem.
    Reutlinger A
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2022 Apr; 92():152-161. PubMed ID: 35182965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.