These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37129803)

  • 1. Taking the Shortcut: Simplifying Heuristics in Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Veldwijk J; Marceta SM; Swait JD; Lipman SA; de Bekker-Grob EW
    Patient; 2023 Jul; 16(4):301-315. PubMed ID: 37129803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A closer look at decision and analyst error by including nonlinearities in discrete choice models: implications on willingness-to-pay estimates derived from discrete choice data in healthcare.
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Rose JM; Bliemer MC
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Dec; 31(12):1169-83. PubMed ID: 24178372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comment on: Taking the Shortcut: Simplifying Heuristics in Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Johnson FR
    Patient; 2023 Jul; 16(4):289-292. PubMed ID: 37233871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. For better or worse? Investigating the validity of best-worst discrete choice experiments in health.
    Krucien N; Sicsic J; Ryan M
    Health Econ; 2019 Apr; 28(4):572-586. PubMed ID: 30761661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the impact of excluded attributes on choice in a discrete choice experiment using a follow-up question.
    Mansfield C; Sutphin J; Boeri M
    Health Econ; 2020 Oct; 29(10):1307-1315. PubMed ID: 32627284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discrete choice analysis of health worker job preferences in Ethiopia: Separating attribute non-attendance from taste heterogeneity.
    Arora N; Quaife M; Hanson K; Lagarde M; Woldesenbet D; Seifu A; Crastes Dit Sourd R
    Health Econ; 2022 May; 31(5):806-819. PubMed ID: 35178825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are Healthcare Choices Predictable? The Impact of Discrete Choice Experiment Designs and Models.
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Swait JD; Kassahun HT; Bliemer MCJ; Jonker MF; Veldwijk J; Cong K; Rose JM; Donkers B
    Value Health; 2019 Sep; 22(9):1050-1062. PubMed ID: 31511182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review.
    Pearce A; Harrison M; Watson V; Street DJ; Howard K; Bansback N; Bryan S
    Patient; 2021 Jan; 14(1):17-53. PubMed ID: 33141359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An introduction to "discrete choice experiments" for behavior analysts.
    Friedel JE; Foreman AM; Wirth O
    Behav Processes; 2022 May; 198():104628. PubMed ID: 35354088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficient Designs for Valuation Studies That Use Time Tradeoff (TTO) Tasks to Map Latent Utilities from Discrete Choice Experiments to the Interval Scale: Selection of Health States for TTO Tasks.
    Che M; Pullenayegum E
    Med Decis Making; 2023 Apr; 43(3):387-396. PubMed ID: 36866604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel design process for selection of attributes for inclusion in discrete choice experiments: case study exploring variation in clinical decision-making about thrombolysis in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke.
    De Brún A; Flynn D; Ternent L; Price CI; Rodgers H; Ford GA; Rudd M; Lancsar E; Simpson S; Teah J; Thomson RG
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jun; 18(1):483. PubMed ID: 29929523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decision heuristic or preference? Attribute non-attendance in discrete choice problems.
    Heidenreich S; Watson V; Ryan M; Phimister E
    Health Econ; 2018 Jan; 27(1):157-171. PubMed ID: 28620975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One Method, Many Methodological Choices: A Structured Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments for Health State Valuation.
    Mulhern B; Norman R; Street DJ; Viney R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2019 Jan; 37(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 30194624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are Efficient Designs Used in Discrete Choice Experiments Too Difficult for Some Respondents? A Case Study Eliciting Preferences for End-of-Life Care.
    Flynn TN; Bilger M; Malhotra C; Finkelstein EA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2016 Mar; 34(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 26589411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods for Conducting Stated Preference Research with Children and Adolescents in Health: A Scoping Review of the Application of Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Michaels-Igbokwe C; Currie GR; Kennedy BL; MacDonald KV; Marshall DA
    Patient; 2021 Nov; 14(6):741-758. PubMed ID: 34008164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide.
    Lancsar E; Louviere J
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(8):661-77. PubMed ID: 18620460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pretesting Discrete-Choice Experiments: A Guide for Researchers.
    Campoamor NB; Guerrini CJ; Brooks WB; Bridges JFP; Crossnohere NL
    Patient; 2024 Mar; 17(2):109-120. PubMed ID: 38363501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing Rationality in Discrete Choice Experiments in Health: An Investigation into the Use of Dominance Tests.
    Tervonen T; Schmidt-Ott T; Marsh K; Bridges JFP; Quaife M; Janssen E
    Value Health; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1192-1197. PubMed ID: 30314620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MCDA swing weighting and discrete choice experiments for elicitation of patient benefit-risk preferences: a critical assessment.
    Tervonen T; Gelhorn H; Sri Bhashyam S; Poon JL; Gries KS; Rentz A; Marsh K
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1483-1491. PubMed ID: 28696023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.