These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37130932)

  • 1. Strengthen scientific review of research protocols.
    Powers JH; Min J; Tribble D
    Nature; 2023 May; 617(7959):35. PubMed ID: 37130932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Let's make peer review scientific.
    Rennie D
    Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7610):31-3. PubMed ID: 27383970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility.
    Begley CG; Buchan AM; Dirnagl U
    Nature; 2015 Sep; 525(7567):25-7. PubMed ID: 26333454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rule rewrite aims to clean up scientific software.
    Check Hayden E
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7547):276-7. PubMed ID: 25877185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The peer-review process: caveat lector.
    Menegazzi JJ
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 1999; 3(2):178-9. PubMed ID: 10225655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The critique: a necessary part of scientific inquiry.
    Schmelzer M
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2006; 29(4):324-5. PubMed ID: 16974173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reviewing a manuscript for publication: how do I do this?
    Koop PP
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(3):107-9. PubMed ID: 10703301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Checklist for the evaluation of research articles.
    DuRant RH
    J Adolesc Health; 1994 Jan; 15(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 8204635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognizing the importance of new tools and resources for research.
    Schekman R; Weigel D; Watt FM
    Elife; 2015 Mar; 4():. PubMed ID: 25824292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Qualitative research articles: information for authors and peer reviewers.
    Rowan M; Huston P
    CMAJ; 1997 Nov; 157(10):1442-6. PubMed ID: 9371080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Critical appraisal. 8. Appraising qualitative research.
    Thompson C
    NT Learn Curve; 1999 Nov; 3(9):7-9. PubMed ID: 10827680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grant reviews: how to do them well.
    Koop PM
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 10703294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review and fraud.
    Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7122):971-2. PubMed ID: 17183274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forum for Applied Cancer Education and Training. Critical appraisal.
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 1999 Mar; 8(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 10362955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methodological index for non-randomized studies.
    Dent O
    ANZ J Surg; 2003 Sep; 73(9):675-6. PubMed ID: 12956779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The qualitative research methodology.
    Saddler D
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2008; 31(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 18300830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to assess rigour . . . or not in qualitative papers.
    Sale JE
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):912-3. PubMed ID: 19018925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thinking out of the box.
    J Cell Sci; 2012 Mar; 125(Pt 6):1363-5. PubMed ID: 22662334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review of nursing research proposals.
    Lindquist RD; Tracy MF; Treat-Jacobson D
    Am J Crit Care; 1995 Jan; 4(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7894558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review: issues in physical medicine and rehabilitation.
    Wagner AK; Boninger ML; Levy C; Chan L; Gater D; Kirby RL
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10):790-802. PubMed ID: 14508411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.