These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37131783)
1. RNA covariation at helix-level resolution for the identification of evolutionarily conserved RNA structure. Rivas E bioRxiv; 2023 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 37131783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating the power of sequence covariation for detecting conserved RNA structure. Rivas E; Clements J; Eddy SR Bioinformatics; 2020 May; 36(10):3072-3076. PubMed ID: 32031582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A statistical test for conserved RNA structure shows lack of evidence for structure in lncRNAs. Rivas E; Clements J; Eddy SR Nat Methods; 2017 Jan; 14(1):45-48. PubMed ID: 27819659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Thirteen dubious ways to detect conserved structural RNAs. Gao W; Yang A; Rivas E IUBMB Life; 2023 Jun; 75(6):471-492. PubMed ID: 36495545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evolutionary conservation of RNA sequence and structure. Rivas E Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA; 2021 Sep; 12(5):e1649. PubMed ID: 33754485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Motif prediction in ribosomal RNAs Lessons and prospects for automated motif prediction in homologous RNA molecules. Leontis NB; Stombaugh J; Westhof E Biochimie; 2002 Sep; 84(9):961-73. PubMed ID: 12458088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contributions of residue pairing to beta-sheet formation: conservation and covariation of amino acid residue pairs on antiparallel beta-strands. Mandel-Gutfreund Y; Zaremba SM; Gregoret LM J Mol Biol; 2001 Feb; 305(5):1145-59. PubMed ID: 11162120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Watson-Crick versus Hoogsteen Base Pairs: Chemical Strategy to Encode and Express Genetic Information in Life. Takahashi S; Sugimoto N Acc Chem Res; 2021 May; 54(9):2110-2120. PubMed ID: 33591181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring covariation in RNA alignments: physical realism improves information measures. Lindgreen S; Gardner PP; Krogh A Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):2988-95. PubMed ID: 17038338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sampled ensemble neutrality as a feature to classify potential structured RNAs. Pei S; Anthony JS; Meyer MM BMC Genomics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):35. PubMed ID: 25649229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robust prediction of consensus secondary structures using averaged base pairing probability matrices. Kiryu H; Kin T; Asai K Bioinformatics; 2007 Feb; 23(4):434-41. PubMed ID: 17182698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frequency and isostericity of RNA base pairs. Stombaugh J; Zirbel CL; Westhof E; Leontis NB Nucleic Acids Res; 2009 Apr; 37(7):2294-312. PubMed ID: 19240142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantum chemical studies of structures and binding in noncanonical RNA base pairs: the trans Watson-Crick:Watson-Crick family. Sharma P; Mitra A; Sharma S; Singh H; Bhattacharyya D J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2008 Jun; 25(6):709-32. PubMed ID: 18399704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. RNA-TVcurve: a Web server for RNA secondary structure comparison based on a multi-scale similarity of its triple vector curve representation. Li Y; Shi X; Liang Y; Xie J; Zhang Y; Ma Q BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):51. PubMed ID: 28109252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]