153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37132094)
1. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomised controlled trial and prospective cohort (SALTO-2 trial).
van Oudheusden AMJ; van IJsselmuiden MN; Menge LF; Coolen AWM; Veen J; van Eijndhoven HWF; Dietz V; Kluivers KB; Spaans WA; Vollebregt A; van de Pol G; Radder CM; van der Ploeg JM; van Kuijk SMJ; Bongers MY
BJOG; 2023 Nov; 130(12):1542-1551. PubMed ID: 37132094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse, a randomized controlled trial: SALTO-2 trial, study protocol.
Coolen AWM; van IJsselmuiden MN; van Oudheusden AMJ; Veen J; van Eijndhoven HWF; Mol BWJ; Roovers JP; Bongers MY
BMC Womens Health; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28747206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
van Oudheusden AMJ; Eissing J; Terink IM; Vink MDH; van Kuijk SMJ; Bongers MY; Coolen AWM
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 36112182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Coolen AWM; Bui BN; Dietz V; Wang R; van Montfoort APA; Mol BWJ; Roovers JWR; Bongers MY
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1767-1783. PubMed ID: 29038834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.
Chan JCY; Yu CH; Go WW
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):271-278. PubMed ID: 36394632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of vaginal mesh repair with sacrospinous vaginal colpopexy in the management of vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy in patients with levator ani avulsion: a randomized controlled trial.
Svabik K; Martan A; Masata J; El-Haddad R; Hubka P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 43(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 24615948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, randomised controlled trials comparing surgical options for upper compartment (vault or uterine) pelvic organ prolapse (the VUE Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Glazener C; Constable L; Hemming C; Breeman S; Elders A; Cooper K; Freeman R; Smith AR; Hagen S; McDonald A; McPherson G; Montgomery I; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Goulao B; Norrie J
Trials; 2016 Sep; 17(1):441. PubMed ID: 27609058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Medium-term outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation for middle compartment prolapse.
Chen Y; Hua K
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 May; 137(2):164-169. PubMed ID: 28099748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral sacrospinous fixation plus an anterior mesh versus abdominal sacrocervicopexy for the treatment of primary apical prolapse in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled study.
de Castro EB; Brito LGO; Juliato CRT
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):365-372. PubMed ID: 31028421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
Baines G; Price N; Jefferis H; Cartwright R; Jackson SR
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 31041499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.
Ow LL; Lim YN; Lee J; Murray C; Thomas E; Leitch A; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs.
Hemming C; Constable L; Goulao B; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Elders A; Cooper K; Smith A; Freeman R; Breeman S; McDonald A; Hagen S; Montgomery I; Norrie J; Glazener C
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Mar; 24(13):1-220. PubMed ID: 32138809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
Geoffrion R; Larouche M
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic repair of vaginal vault prolapse by lateral suspension with mesh.
Dubuisson J; Eperon I; Dällenbach P; Dubuisson JB
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Feb; 287(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 23001368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-year anatomical and functional outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using light-weight Y shaped mesh for post hysterectomy vaginal prolapse.
Fayyad A; Harris R; Ibrahim S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Mar; 270():139-143. PubMed ID: 35051826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Re: Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Sacrospinous Fixation for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: A Randomised Controlled Trial and Prospective Cohort (SALTO-2 Trial).
Braga A; Papadia A; Serati M
Eur Urol; 2024 Jul; 86(1):78-79. PubMed ID: 38531700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).
Schulten SFM; Enklaar RA; Kluivers KB; van Leijsen SAL; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Adang EMM; van Bavel J; van Dongen H; Gerritse MBE; van Gestel I; Malmberg GGA; Mouw RJC; van Rumpt-van de Geest DA; Spaans WA; van der Steen A; Stekelenburg J; Tiersma ESM; Verkleij-Hagoort AC; Vollebregt A; Wingen CBM; Weemhoff M; van Eijndhoven HWF
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 30940171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
