These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37132233)

  • 21. Morphometric analyses of sexual dimorphism in sound-emitting structures in adults of the bess beetle Vindex agnoscendus (Coleoptera: Passalidae).
    Ariza-Marín ER; De Luna E
    Zoology (Jena); 2022 Apr; 151():125992. PubMed ID: 35228128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Why do males emerge before females? Sexual size dimorphism drives sexual bimaturism in insects.
    Teder T; Kaasik A; Taits K; Tammaru T
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2021 Dec; 96(6):2461-2475. PubMed ID: 34128582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On the origins of sexual dimorphism in butterflies.
    Oliver JC; Monteiro A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Jul; 278(1714):1981-8. PubMed ID: 21123259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sexual selection on male size drives the evolution of male-biased sexual size dimorphism via the prolongation of male development.
    Rohner PT; Blanckenhorn WU; Puniamoorthy N
    Evolution; 2016 Jun; 70(6):1189-99. PubMed ID: 27168489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assigning sex to pre-adult stalk-eyed flies using genital disc morphology and X chromosome zygosity.
    Carr M; Cotton S; Rogers DW; Pomiankowski A; Smith H; Fowler K
    BMC Dev Biol; 2006 Jun; 6():29. PubMed ID: 16780578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cope's Rule and the Universal Scaling Law of Ornament Complexity.
    Raia P; Passaro F; Carotenuto F; Maiorino L; Piras P; Teresi L; Meiri S; Itescu Y; Novosolov M; Baiano MA; Martínez R; Fortelius M
    Am Nat; 2015 Aug; 186(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 26655146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hidden complexity in the ontogeny of sexual size dimorphism in male-larger beetles.
    Vendl T; Šípek P; Kouklík O; Kratochvíl L
    Sci Rep; 2018 Apr; 8(1):5871. PubMed ID: 29650984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The evolution of genital complexity and mating rates in sexually size dimorphic spiders.
    Kuntner M; Cheng RC; Kralj-Fišer S; Liao CP; Schneider JM; Elgar MA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):242. PubMed ID: 27829358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Life-history responses of the rice stem borer Chilo suppressalis to temperature change: Breaking the temperature-size rule.
    Fu DM; He HM; Zou C; Xiao HJ; Xue FS
    J Therm Biol; 2016 Oct; 61():115-118. PubMed ID: 27712652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of functional constraints in nonrandom mating patterns for a dance fly with female ornaments.
    Murray RL; Gwynne DT; Bussière LF
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Sep; 32(9):984-993. PubMed ID: 31250502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. No fecundity cost of female secondary sexual trait expression in the horned beetle Onthophagus sagittarius.
    Simmons LW; Emlen DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1227-35. PubMed ID: 18631210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Correlated responses to artificial body size selection in growth, development, phenotypic plasticity and juvenile viability in yellow dung flies.
    Teuschl Y; Reim C; Blanckenhorn WU
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jan; 20(1):87-103. PubMed ID: 17210003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ornament Complexity Is Correlated with Sexual Selection: (A Comment on Raia et al., "Cope's Rule and the Universal Scaling Law of Ornament Complexity").
    Holman L; Bro-Jørgensen J
    Am Nat; 2016 Aug; 188(2):272-5. PubMed ID: 27420791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The allometric pattern of sexually size dimorphic feather ornaments and factors affecting allometry.
    Cuervo JJ; Møller AP
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Jul; 22(7):1503-15. PubMed ID: 19467133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The handicap process favors exaggerated, rather than reduced, sexual ornaments.
    Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 2014 Sep; 68(9):2534-49. PubMed ID: 24837599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Critical weight mediates sex-specific body size plasticity and sexual dimorphism in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (Diptera: Scathophagidae).
    Rohner PT; Blanckenhorn WU; Schäfer MA
    Evol Dev; 2017 May; 19(3):147-156. PubMed ID: 28463473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pupal period and adult size in Drosophila melanogaster: a cautionary tale of contrasting correlations between two sexually dimorphic traits.
    Nunney L
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jan; 20(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 17210007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evolutionary innovations overcome ancestral constraints: a re-examination of character evolution in male sepsid flies (Diptera: Sepsidae).
    Wagner GP; Müller GB
    Evol Dev; 2002; 4(1):1-6; discussion 7-8. PubMed ID: 11868655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Population variation in sexual selection and its effect on size allometry in two dung fly species with contrasting sexual size dimorphism.
    Kraushaar U; Blanckenhorn WU
    Evolution; 2002 Feb; 56(2):307-21. PubMed ID: 11926499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Signaling efficacy drives the evolution of larger sexual ornaments by sexual selection.
    Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 2014 Jan; 68(1):216-29. PubMed ID: 24099137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.