These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3713274)
21. Current injection into a two-dimensional anisotropic bidomain. Sepulveda NG; Roth BJ; Wikswo JP Biophys J; 1989 May; 55(5):987-99. PubMed ID: 2720084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Alteration of defibrillation threshold by antiarrhythmic drugs: a theoretical framework. Babbs CF Crit Care Med; 1981 May; 9(5):362-3. PubMed ID: 7214953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of ventricular myocardium characteristics on the defibrillation threshold. Qian L; Wang J; Jin L; Song B; Wu X Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(S1):241-248. PubMed ID: 29710752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of premature anodal stimulations on cardiac transmembrane potential and intracellular calcium distributions computed by anisotropic Bidomain models. Colli Franzone P; Pavarino LF; Scacchi S Europace; 2014 May; 16(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 24798963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The fundamental law of electrostimulation and its application to defibrillation. Irnich W Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Nov; 13(11 Pt 1):1433-47. PubMed ID: 1701898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Efficacy of monophasic electrical impulses with steep leading and trailing edges in cardiac defibrillation. Raugalas E; Blazek Z; Vrána M Cor Vasa; 1977; 19(4-5):376-84. PubMed ID: 598211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Construction of a computer model to investigate sawtooth effects in the Purkinje system. Vigmond EJ; Clements C IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Mar; 54(3):389-99. PubMed ID: 17355050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The biphasic mystery: why a biphasic shock is more effective than a monophasic shock for defibrillation. Keener JP; Lewis TJ J Theor Biol; 1999 Sep; 200(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 10479536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A simulation study of the reaction of human heart to biphasic electrical shocks. Popp LM; Seemann G; Dössel O BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2004 Jun; 4():9. PubMed ID: 15212691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Passive propagation of the transmembrane potential induced by the capacities of the myocardium bioelectrolytes in its electric defibrillation]. Rybkin SN; Selishchev SV Med Tekh; 2004; (3):12-8. PubMed ID: 15293496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of electroporation on transmembrane potential induced by defibrillation shocks. Krassowska W Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Sep; 18(9 Pt 1):1644-60. PubMed ID: 7491308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Electric field stimulation of excitable tissue. Plonsey R; Barr RC IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1998; 17(5):130-7. PubMed ID: 9770615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Finite element analysis of cardiac defibrillation current distributions. Sepulveda NG; Wikswo JP; Echt DS IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Apr; 37(4):354-65. PubMed ID: 2338348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A physical approach to remove anatomical reentries: a bidomain study. Takagi S; Pumir A; Pazó D; Efimov I; Nikolski V; Krinsky V J Theor Biol; 2004 Oct; 230(4):489-97. PubMed ID: 15363671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Physiologic principles of electrical excitability of the heart]. Schubert E Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1969 Jan; 24(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 5784083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Direct activation and defibrillation of cardiac tissue. Keener JP J Theor Biol; 1996 Feb; 178(3):313-24. PubMed ID: 8730350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impedance to defibrillation countershock: does an optimal impedance exist? KenKnight BH; Eyüboğlu BM; Ideker RE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Nov; 18(11):2068-87. PubMed ID: 8552522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]