These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37132764)

  • 1. Optimized dithering approach for 3D shape measurement using a phase-based chaos genetic algorithm.
    Zhang P; Lu B; Wang S; Meng X; Chen T; Hu S
    Appl Opt; 2023 Apr; 62(10):D8-D16. PubMed ID: 37132764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-quality 3D shape measurement by kernel-optimized high sinusoidal similarity dither patterns.
    Zhou P; Cai N; Wang T; Cao XQ; Lin B
    Appl Opt; 2020 Dec; 59(34):10645-10650. PubMed ID: 33361881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Theoretical analysis and experimental investigation of the Floyd-Steinberg-based fringe binary method with offset compensation for accurate 3D measurement.
    You D; You Z; Zhou P; Zhu J
    Opt Express; 2022 Jul; 30(15):26807-26823. PubMed ID: 36236866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Motion-induced error reduction for binary defocusing profilometry via additional temporal sampling.
    Wang Y; Suresh V; Li B
    Opt Express; 2019 Aug; 27(17):23948-23958. PubMed ID: 31510291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phase error compensation for three-dimensional shape measurement with projector defocusing.
    Xu Y; Ekstrand L; Dai J; Zhang S
    Appl Opt; 2011 Jun; 50(17):2572-81. PubMed ID: 21673758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-quality binary fringe generation by multi-scale optimization on intensity and phase.
    Wang X; Mai S; Yu J
    Appl Opt; 2022 Nov; 61(32):9405-9414. PubMed ID: 36606886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-efficiency and robust binary fringe optimization for superfast 3D shape measurement.
    Zhu S; Cao Y; Zhang Q; Wang Y
    Opt Express; 2022 Sep; 30(20):35539-35553. PubMed ID: 36258503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exhaustive dithering algorithm for 3D shape reconstruction by fringe projection profilometry.
    Silva A; Muñoz A; Flores JL; Villa J
    Appl Opt; 2020 May; 59(13):D31-D38. PubMed ID: 32400620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional shape measurement with binary dithered patterns.
    Wang Y; Zhang S
    Appl Opt; 2012 Sep; 51(27):6631-6. PubMed ID: 23033035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal-spatial binary encoding method based on dynamic threshold optimization for 3D shape measurement.
    Zhou P; Feng X; Luo J; Zhu J
    Opt Express; 2023 Jul; 31(14):23274-23293. PubMed ID: 37475416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phase error analysis and compensation for phase shifting profilometry with projector defocusing.
    Zheng D; Da F; Kemao Q; Seah HS
    Appl Opt; 2016 Jul; 55(21):5721-8. PubMed ID: 27463929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal defocus selection based on normed Fourier transform for digital fringe pattern profilometry.
    Kamagara A; Wang X; Li S
    Appl Opt; 2017 Oct; 56(28):8014-8022. PubMed ID: 29047791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Passive binary defocusing for large depth 3D measurement based on deep learning.
    Li Y; Shen J; Wu Z; Zhang Q
    Appl Opt; 2021 Aug; 60(24):7243-7253. PubMed ID: 34613012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defocusing parameter selection strategies based on PSF measurement for square-binary defocusing fringe projection profilometry.
    Wang Y; Zhao H; Jiang H; Li X
    Opt Express; 2018 Aug; 26(16):20351-20367. PubMed ID: 30119346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimized pulse width modulation pattern strategy for three-dimensional profilometry with projector defocusing.
    Zuo C; Chen Q; Feng S; Feng F; Gu G; Sui X
    Appl Opt; 2012 Jul; 51(19):4477-90. PubMed ID: 22772122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal frequency selection for accuracy improvement in binary defocusing fringe projection profilometry.
    Zhu J; Feng X; Zhu C; Zhou P
    Appl Opt; 2022 Aug; 61(23):6897-6904. PubMed ID: 36255771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High dynamic defocus response method for binary defocusing fringe projection profilometry.
    Zheng Z; Gao J; Zhuang Y; Zhang L; Chen X
    Opt Lett; 2021 Aug; 46(15):3749-3752. PubMed ID: 34329272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Error-diffusion-kernel parameters for binary pattern in 1-bit fringe projection profilometry.
    Shan S; Xu P; Zhang W; Li Z; Liu J; Wang J
    Appl Opt; 2023 Nov; 62(33):8882-8893. PubMed ID: 38038034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Online fringe pitch selection for defocusing a binary square pattern projection phase-shifting method.
    Hu Y; Liu Z; Yang D; Quan C
    Opt Express; 2020 Oct; 28(21):30710-30725. PubMed ID: 33115066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 3D absolute shape measurement of live rabbit hearts with a superfast two-frequency phase-shifting technique.
    Wang Y; Laughner JI; Efimov IR; Zhang S
    Opt Express; 2013 Mar; 21(5):5822-32. PubMed ID: 23482151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.