148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37133392)
1. Predicting Protein-Ligand Binding and Unbinding Kinetics with Biased MD Simulations and Coarse-Graining of Dynamics: Current State and Challenges.
Wolf S
J Chem Inf Model; 2023 May; 63(10):2902-2910. PubMed ID: 37133392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variational implicit-solvent predictions of the dry-wet transition pathways for ligand-receptor binding and unbinding kinetics.
Zhou S; Weiß RG; Cheng LT; Dzubiella J; McCammon JA; Li B
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Jul; 116(30):14989-14994. PubMed ID: 31270236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The prediction of protein-ligand unbinding for modern drug discovery.
Zhang Q; Zhao N; Meng X; Yu F; Yao X; Liu H
Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2022 Feb; 17(2):191-205. PubMed ID: 34731059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of Protein-Ligand Unbinding Kinetics Using Non-Equilibrium Targeted Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
Wolf S; Amaral M; Lowinski M; Vallée F; Musil D; Güldenhaupt J; Dreyer MK; Bomke J; Frech M; Schlitter J; Gerwert K
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Dec; 59(12):5135-5147. PubMed ID: 31697501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Path separation of dissipation-corrected targeted molecular dynamics simulations of protein-ligand unbinding.
Wolf S; Post M; Stock G
J Chem Phys; 2023 Mar; 158(12):124106. PubMed ID: 37003731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transient States and Barriers from Molecular Simulations and the Milestoning Theory: Kinetics in Ligand-Protein Recognition and Compound Design.
Tang Z; Chen SH; Chang CA
J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Mar; 16(3):1882-1895. PubMed ID: 32031801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Toward High-Throughput Predictive Modeling of Protein Binding/Unbinding Kinetics.
Chiu SH; Xie L
J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1164-74. PubMed ID: 27159844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combined Free-Energy Calculation and Machine Learning Methods for Understanding Ligand Unbinding Kinetics.
Badaoui M; Buigues PJ; Berta D; Mandana GM; Gu H; Földes T; Dickson CJ; Hornak V; Kato M; Molteni C; Parsons S; Rosta E
J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Apr; 18(4):2543-2555. PubMed ID: 35195418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Attempting Well-Tempered Funnel Metadynamics Simulations for the Evaluation of the Binding Kinetics of Methionine Aminopeptidase-II Inhibitors.
Rubina ; Moin ST
J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Dec; 63(24):7729-7743. PubMed ID: 38059911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accelerating Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Drug Discovery.
Koirala K; Joshi K; Adediwura V; Wang J; Do H; Miao Y
Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2714():187-202. PubMed ID: 37676600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ranking of Ligand Binding Kinetics Using a Weighted Ensemble Approach and Comparison with a Multiscale Milestoning Approach.
Ahn SH; Jagger BR; Amaro RE
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Nov; 60(11):5340-5352. PubMed ID: 32315175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New approaches for computing ligand-receptor binding kinetics.
Bruce NJ; Ganotra GK; Kokh DB; Sadiq SK; Wade RC
Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2018 Apr; 49():1-10. PubMed ID: 29132080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Supervised Molecular Dynamics Approach to Unbiased Ligand-Protein Unbinding.
Deganutti G; Moro S; Reynolds CA
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Mar; 60(3):1804-1817. PubMed ID: 32126172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhanced Sampling Simulations of Ligand Unbinding Kinetics Controlled by Protein Conformational Changes.
Zhou Y; Zou R; Kuang G; Långström B; Halldin C; Ågren H; Tu Y
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Sep; 59(9):3910-3918. PubMed ID: 31454236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using physics-based pose predictions and free energy perturbation calculations to predict binding poses and relative binding affinities for FXR ligands in the D3R Grand Challenge 2.
Athanasiou C; Vasilakaki S; Dellis D; Cournia Z
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):21-44. PubMed ID: 29119352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Binding Kinetics Toolkit for Analyzing Transient Molecular Conformations and Computing Free Energy Landscapes.
Ruzmetov T; Montes R; Sun J; Chen SH; Tang Z; Chang CA
J Phys Chem A; 2022 Nov; 126(46):8761-8770. PubMed ID: 36346951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Baseline Model for Predicting Protein-Ligand Unbinding Kinetics through Machine Learning.
Amangeldiuly N; Karlov D; Fedorov MV
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Dec; 60(12):5946-5956. PubMed ID: 33183000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multisecond ligand dissociation dynamics from atomistic simulations.
Wolf S; Lickert B; Bray S; Stock G
Nat Commun; 2020 Jun; 11(1):2918. PubMed ID: 32522984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward Achieving Efficient and Accurate Ligand-Protein Unbinding with Deep Learning and Molecular Dynamics through RAVE.
Lamim Ribeiro JM; Tiwary P
J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Jan; 15(1):708-719. PubMed ID: 30525598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting ligand binding affinity using on- and off-rates for the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge.
Dixon T; Lotz SD; Dickson A
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1001-1012. PubMed ID: 30141102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
