These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37133392)

  • 21. Accelerating Rare Dissociative Processes in Biomolecules Using Selectively Scaled MD Simulations.
    Deb I; Frank AT
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Nov; 15(11):5817-5828. PubMed ID: 31509413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Exploring the Ligand Binding/Unbinding Pathway by Selectively Enhanced Sampling of Ligand in a Protein-Ligand Complex.
    Shao Q; Zhu W
    J Phys Chem B; 2019 Sep; 123(38):7974-7983. PubMed ID: 31478672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of electrostatic interactions on ligand dissociation kinetics.
    Erbaş A; de la Cruz MO; Marko JF
    Phys Rev E; 2018 Feb; 97(2-1):022405. PubMed ID: 29548245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Role of water and steric constraints in the kinetics of cavity-ligand unbinding.
    Tiwary P; Mondal J; Morrone JA; Berne BJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Sep; 112(39):12015-9. PubMed ID: 26371312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The free energy landscape of small molecule unbinding.
    Huang D; Caflisch A
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2011 Feb; 7(2):e1002002. PubMed ID: 21390201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of protein-ligand affinity prediction using steered molecular dynamics simulations.
    Okimoto N; Suenaga A; Taiji M
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2017 Nov; 35(15):3221-3231. PubMed ID: 27771988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ligand Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics 2 (LiGaMD2): Improved Calculations of Ligand Binding Thermodynamics and Kinetics with Closed Protein Pocket.
    Wang J; Miao Y
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Feb; 19(3):733-745. PubMed ID: 36706316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinities and binding poses from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations.
    Sun Z; He Q; Li X; Zhu Z
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):589-600. PubMed ID: 31974852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Unbinding Kinetics of a p38 MAP Kinase Type II Inhibitor from Metadynamics Simulations.
    Casasnovas R; Limongelli V; Tiwary P; Carloni P; Parrinello M
    J Am Chem Soc; 2017 Apr; 139(13):4780-4788. PubMed ID: 28290199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contact Map Fingerprints of Protein-Ligand Unbinding Trajectories Reveal Mechanisms Determining Residence Times Computed from Scaled Molecular Dynamics.
    Bianciotto M; Gkeka P; Kokh DB; Wade RC; Minoux H
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Oct; 17(10):6522-6535. PubMed ID: 34494849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Decoding the Role of Water Dynamics in Ligand-Protein Unbinding: CRF1R as a Test Case.
    Bortolato A; Deflorian F; Weiss DR; Mason JS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Sep; 55(9):1857-66. PubMed ID: 26335976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Temperature Accelerated Sliced Sampling to Probe Ligand Dissociation from Protein.
    Tripathi S; Nair NN
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Aug; 63(16):5182-5191. PubMed ID: 37540828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How Robust Is the Ligand Binding Transition State?
    Bose S; Lotz SD; Deb I; Shuck M; Lee KSS; Dickson A
    J Am Chem Soc; 2023 Nov; 145(46):25318-25331. PubMed ID: 37943667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Molecular recognition in a diverse set of protein-ligand interactions studied with molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations.
    Wang B; Li L; Hurley TD; Meroueh SO
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2659-70. PubMed ID: 24032517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bell-Evans model and steered molecular dynamics in uncovering the dissociation kinetics of ligands targeting G-protein-coupled receptors.
    Akhunzada MJ; Yoon HJ; Deb I; Braka A; Wu S
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15972. PubMed ID: 36153364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Residence Time Prediction of Type 1 and 2 Kinase Inhibitors from Unbinding Simulations.
    Braka A; Garnier N; Bonnet P; Aci-Sèche S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Jan; 60(1):342-348. PubMed ID: 31834793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Using Selectively Scaled Molecular Dynamics Simulations to Assess Ligand Poses in RNA Aptamers.
    Liu Y; Frank AT
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Sep; 18(9):5703-5709. PubMed ID: 35926894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Umbrella Sampling-Based Method to Compute Ligand-Binding Affinity.
    Ngo ST; Pham MQ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2385():313-323. PubMed ID: 34888726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Investigation of protein folding by coarse-grained molecular dynamics with the UNRES force field.
    Maisuradze GG; Senet P; Czaplewski C; Liwo A; Scheraga HA
    J Phys Chem A; 2010 Apr; 114(13):4471-85. PubMed ID: 20166738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Understanding the differences of the ligand binding/unbinding pathways between phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated ARH1 using molecular dynamics simulations.
    Zhu J; Lv Y; Han X; Xu D; Han W
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):12439. PubMed ID: 28963484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.