577 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37133712)
21. EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L proxy report: psychometric performance and agreement with self-report.
Fitriana TS; Purba FD; Stolk E; Busschbach JJV
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2022 Jun; 20(1):88. PubMed ID: 35659313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A systematic review of health state utility values and psychometric performance of generic preference-based instruments for children and adolescents with mental health problems.
Thai TTH; Engel L; Perez JK; Tan EJ; Eades S; Sanci L; Mihalopoulos C
Qual Life Res; 2023 Nov; 32(11):3005-3026. PubMed ID: 37237136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A review of preference-based measures for the assessment of quality of life in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.
Mpundu-Kaambwa C; Chen G; Huynh E; Russo R; Ratcliffe J
Qual Life Res; 2018 Jul; 27(7):1781-1799. PubMed ID: 29569017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Interchangeability of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D, and comparison of their psychometric properties in a spinal postoperative Spanish population.
Selva-Sevilla C; Ferrara P; Gerónimo-Pardo M
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Jun; 21(4):649-662. PubMed ID: 32065301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis.
Marra CA; Woolcott JC; Kopec JA; Shojania K; Offer R; Brazier JE; Esdaile JM; Anis AH
Soc Sci Med; 2005 Apr; 60(7):1571-82. PubMed ID: 15652688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparing the psychometric properties of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L proxy ratings by informal caregivers and a health professional for people with dementia.
Michalowsky B; Hoffmann W; Mohr W; Rädke A; Xie F
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2022 Oct; 20(1):140. PubMed ID: 36199138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: a systematic review, statistical modelling and survey.
Longworth L; Yang Y; Young T; Mulhern B; Hernández Alava M; Mukuria C; Rowen D; Tosh J; Tsuchiya A; Evans P; Devianee Keetharuth A; Brazier J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Feb; 18(9):1-224. PubMed ID: 24524660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Using EQ-5D for Proxy Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in Residential Care Facilities: A Systematic Review of Feasibility and Psychometric Properties.
Cheng LJ; Engel L; Chen LA; Soh SZY; Koh GC; Luo N
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2024 Jun; 25(6):104870. PubMed ID: 38043585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Head-to-Head Comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and AQoL-8D Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments in Patients Who Have Previously Undergone Bariatric Surgery.
Campbell JA; Palmer AJ; Venn A; Sharman M; Otahal P; Neil A
Patient; 2016 Aug; 9(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 26841910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reliability, validity and relevance of needs assessment instruments for informal dementia caregivers: a psychometric systematic review.
Kipfer S; Pihet S
JBI Evid Synth; 2020 Apr; 18(4):704-742. PubMed ID: 32813339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].
Jaussent S; Labarère J; Boyer JP; François P
Encephale; 2004; 30(5):437-46. PubMed ID: 15627048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Psychometric Evaluation of the PedsQL GCS and CHU9D in Australian Children and Adolescents with Common Chronic Health Conditions.
Raghunandan R; Howard K; Smith S; Killedar A; Cvejic E; Howell M; Petrou S; Lancsar E; Wong G; Craig J; Hayes A
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2023 Nov; 21(6):949-965. PubMed ID: 37789175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mind the (inter-rater) gap. An investigation of self-reported versus proxy-reported assessments in the derivation of childhood utility values for economic evaluation: A systematic review.
Khadka J; Kwon J; Petrou S; Lancsar E; Ratcliffe J
Soc Sci Med; 2019 Nov; 240():112543. PubMed ID: 31586777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures.
Brazier J; Connell J; Papaioannou D; Mukuria C; Mulhern B; Peasgood T; Jones ML; Paisley S; O'Cathain A; Barkham M; Knapp M; Byford S; Gilbody S; Parry G
Health Technol Assess; 2014 May; 18(34):vii-viii, xiii-xxv, 1-188. PubMed ID: 24857402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utility Measures in Symptomatic benign Thyroid Nodules: Acceptability and Psychometric Evaluation.
Wong CKH; Lang BHH; Yu HMS; Lam CLK
Patient; 2017 Aug; 10(4):447-454. PubMed ID: 28224296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D in children and adolescents: a systematic review protocol.
do Espirito Santo CM; Santos VS; Miyamoto GC; Chiarotto A; Santos M; Yamato TP
Syst Rev; 2024 Jan; 13(1):18. PubMed ID: 38183127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Measurement Instruments Assessing Multi-Faceted Stigma Regarding Sexual and Gender Minorities: A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties.
Aggarwal A; Qiao S; O'Leary SD; Schlekat KN; Li X
AIDS Behav; 2024 Jun; 28(6):2054-2077. PubMed ID: 38441698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Differential Psychometric Properties of EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level and Short-Form 6-Dimension Utility Measures in Low Back Pain.
Cheung PWH; Wong CKH; Cheung JPY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jun; 44(11):E679-E686. PubMed ID: 30475342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A systematic literature review of health state utility values in head and neck cancer.
Meregaglia M; Cairns J
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Sep; 15(1):174. PubMed ID: 28865475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Systematic Review of Conceptual, Age, Measurement and Valuation Considerations for Generic Multidimensional Childhood Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.
Kwon J; Freijser L; Huynh E; Howell M; Chen G; Khan K; Daher S; Roberts N; Harrison C; Smith S; Devlin N; Howard K; Lancsar E; Bailey C; Craig J; Dalziel K; Hayes A; Mulhern B; Wong G; Ratcliffe J; Petrou S
Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Apr; 40(4):379-431. PubMed ID: 35072935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
