These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37137214)

  • 1. A proactive crash risk prediction framework for lane-changing behavior incorporating individual driving styles.
    Zhang Y; Chen Y; Gu X; Sze NN; Huang J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107072. PubMed ID: 37137214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A proactive lane-changing risk prediction framework considering driving intention recognition and different lane-changing patterns.
    Shangguan Q; Fu T; Wang J; Fang S; Fu L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jan; 164():106500. PubMed ID: 34823098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A hybrid deep learning approach for driver anomalous lane changing identification.
    Fan P; Guo J; Wang Y; Wijnands JS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jun; 171():106661. PubMed ID: 35462211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An entropy-based analysis of lane changing behavior: An interactive approach.
    Kosun C; Ozdemir S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(4):441-447. PubMed ID: 27603156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Driver Behavior During Overtaking Maneuvers from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Chen R; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S176-81. PubMed ID: 26436229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Key feature selection and risk prediction for lane-changing behaviors based on vehicles' trajectory data.
    Chen T; Shi X; Wong YD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():156-169. PubMed ID: 31150922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time-Series-Based Personalized Lane-Changing Decision-Making Model.
    Ye M; Pu L; Li P; Lu X; Liu Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(17):. PubMed ID: 36081119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detecting lane change maneuvers using SHRP2 naturalistic driving data: A comparative study machine learning techniques.
    Das A; Khan MN; Ahmed MM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105578. PubMed ID: 32408143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Support Vector Machine Based Lane-Changing Behavior Recognition and Lateral Trajectory Prediction.
    Feng Y; Yan X
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():3632333. PubMed ID: 35592714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Research on Lane Changing Game and Behavioral Decision Making Based on Driving Styles and Micro-Interaction Behaviors.
    Ye M; Li P; Yang Z; Liu Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(18):. PubMed ID: 36146081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A co-evolutionary lane-changing trajectory planning method for automated vehicles based on the instantaneous risk identification.
    Wu J; Chen X; Bie Y; Zhou W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Feb; 180():106907. PubMed ID: 36455450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new method of temporal and spatial risk estimation for lane change considering conventional recognition defects.
    Wu J; Wen H; Qi W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105796. PubMed ID: 33099126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An interpretable prediction model of illegal running into the opposite lane on curve sections of two-lane rural roads from drivers' visual perceptions.
    He L; Yu B; Chen Y; Bao S; Gao K; Kong Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 186():107066. PubMed ID: 37058902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors associated with driver injury severity of lane changing crashes involving younger and older drivers.
    Adanu EK; Lidbe A; Tedla E; Jones S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105867. PubMed ID: 33197795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proactive crash risk prediction modeling for merging assistance system at interchange merging areas.
    Gu X; Cai Q; Lee J; Xiang Q; Ma Y; Xu X
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(3):234-240. PubMed ID: 32154738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Heterogeneous overtaking and learning styles with varied EEG patterns in a reinforced driving task.
    Zhao S; Guan W; Qi G; Li P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jun; 171():106665. PubMed ID: 35421817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The dynamic tradeoff between safety and efficiency in discretionary lane-changing behavior: A random parameters logit approach with heterogeneity in means and variances.
    Li Y; Gu R; Lee J; Yang M; Chen Q; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Apr; 153():106036. PubMed ID: 33607318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of factors influencing aggressive driver behavior and crash involvement.
    Adavikottu A; Velaga NR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S21-S26. PubMed ID: 34491872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-Modal Vehicle Trajectory Prediction by Collaborative Learning of Lane Orientation, Vehicle Interaction, and Intention.
    Tian W; Wang S; Wang Z; Wu M; Zhou S; Bi X
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 35684916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of the connected environment on driving behavior and safety: A driving simulator study.
    Ali Y; Sharma A; Haque MM; Zheng Z; Saifuzzaman M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105643. PubMed ID: 32593781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.