131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37137798)
1. Sex-Specific Differences in Aortic Valve Calcification Between Bicuspid and Tricuspid Severe Aortic Stenosis.
Veulemans V; Hokken TW; Heermann J; Kardys I; Maier O; Adrichem R; Ooms J; Nuis RJ; Daemen J; Hirsch A; Budde RP; Zeus T; Van Mieghem NM
Am J Cardiol; 2023 Jun; 197():87-92. PubMed ID: 37137798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed tomography calcium scoring in aortic stenosis: bicuspid versus tricuspid morphology.
Ye Z; Clavel MA; Foley TA; Pibarot P; Enriquez-Sarano M; Michelena HI
Heart; 2024 Mar; 110(8):594-602. PubMed ID: 37903555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of age and aortic valve anatomy on calcification and haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis.
Shen M; Tastet L; Capoulade R; Larose É; Bédard É; Arsenault M; Chetaille P; Dumesnil JG; Mathieu P; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
Heart; 2017 Jan; 103(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 27504001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aortic Stenosis Progression, Cardiac Damage, and Survival: Comparison Between Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves.
Yang LT; Boler A; Medina-Inojosa JR; Scott CG; Maurer MJ; Eleid MF; Enriquez-Sarano M; Tribouilloy C; Michelena HI
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jun; 14(6):1113-1126. PubMed ID: 33744153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis Demonstrate Adverse Left Ventricular Remodeling and Impaired Cardiac Function Before Surgery With Increased Risk of Postoperative Heart Failure.
Wedin JO; Vedin O; Rodin S; Simonson OE; Hörsne Malmborg J; Pallin J; James SK; Flachskampf FA; Ståhle E; Grinnemo KH
Circulation; 2022 Oct; 146(17):1310-1322. PubMed ID: 35971843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computed Tomography Aortic Valve Calcium Scoring in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.
Shen M; Oh JK; Guzzetti E; Singh GK; Pawade T; Tastet L; Clavel MA; Delgado V; Bax JJ; Dweck MR; Abbas AE; Mando R; Falconi ML; Perez de Arenaza D; Poh KK; Kong W; Tay E; Pressman G; Brito D; Song JK; Pibarot P
Struct Heart; 2022 Apr; 6(1):100027. PubMed ID: 37273477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of bicuspid vs. tricuspid aortic valve stenosis.
Huntley GD; Thaden JJ; Alsidawi S; Michelena HI; Maleszewski JJ; Edwards WD; Scott CG; Pislaru SV; Pellikka PA; Greason KL; Ammash NM; Malouf JF; Enriquez-Sarano M; Nkomo VT
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 19(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 29029001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Less pronounced reverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared to tricuspid aortic stenosis.
Xiong TY; Wang X; Li YJ; Liao YB; Zhao ZG; Wei X; Xu YN; Zheng MX; Zhou X; Peng Y; Wei JF; Feng Y; Chen M
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov; 34(11):1761-1767. PubMed ID: 29915878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Impact of bicuspid aortic valve or tricuspid aortic valve on hemodynamics and left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement].
Zhang JQ; Chi CW; Zhao WL; Meng QT; Wang LD; Liu JY; Sun FZ; Zhang SL; Liu JH
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 50(12):1193-1200. PubMed ID: 36517440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Aortic annulus and root characteristics in severe aortic stenosis due to bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valves: implications for transcatheter aortic valve therapies.
Philip F; Faza NN; Schoenhagen P; Desai MY; Tuzcu EM; Svensson LG; Kapadia SR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):E88-98. PubMed ID: 25914355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence of subannular and left ventricular morphological differences in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis: magnetic resonance imaging-based analysis.
Disha K; Dubslaff G; Rouman M; Fey B; Borger MA; Barker AJ; Kuntze T; Girdauskas E
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Mar; 24(3):369-376. PubMed ID: 28040769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety and efficacy of minimalist transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a new-generation balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves.
Michel JM; Frangieh AH; Giacoppo D; Alvarez-Covarrubias HA; Pellegrini C; Rheude T; Deutsch O; Mayr NP; Rumpf PM; Stähli BE; Kastrati A; Schunkert H; Xhepa E; Joner M; Kasel AM
Clin Res Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 110(12):1993-2006. PubMed ID: 34505192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contemporary differences between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve in chronic aortic regurgitation.
Yang LT; Benfari G; Eleid M; Scott CG; Nkomo VT; Pellikka PA; Anavekar NS; Enriquez-Sarano M; Michelena HI
Heart; 2021 Jun; 107(11):916-924. PubMed ID: 33109713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Clinical and Echocardiographic Features of Asymptomatic Patients With Stenotic Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves.
Sia CH; Ho JS; Chua JJ; Tan BY; Ngiam NJ; Chew N; Sim HW; Chen R; Lee CH; Yeo TC; Kong WK; Poh KK
Am J Cardiol; 2020 Aug; 128():210-215. PubMed ID: 32534732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multichamber Strain Characterization Is a Robust Prognosticator for Both Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis.
Ye Z; Yang LT; Medina-Inojosa JR; Scott CG; Padang R; Luis SA; Nkomo VT; Enriquez-Sarano M; Michelena HI
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2022 Sep; 35(9):956-965. PubMed ID: 35613661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic Implications of Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valve Phenotype on Progression of Moderate Aortic Stenosis and Ascending Aorta Dilatation.
Chew NWS; Phua K; Ho YJ; Zhang A; Lin N; Ngiam JN; Lau YX; Teo VXY; Sia CH; Loh PH; Kuntjoro I; Wong RCC; Lee CH; Tan HC; Yeo TC; Kong WKF; Poh KK
Am J Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 161():76-83. PubMed ID: 34627597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aortic stiffness in aortic stenosis assessed by cardiovascular MRI: a comparison between bicuspid and tricuspid valves.
Singh A; Horsfield MA; Bekele S; Greenwood JP; Dawson DK; Berry C; Hogrefe K; Kelly DJ; Houston JG; Guntur Ramkumar P; Uddin A; Suzuki T; McCann GP
Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2340-2349. PubMed ID: 30488106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Persistence of Reduced Left Ventricular Function after Aortic Valve Surgery for Aortic Valve Regurgitation: Bicuspid versus Tricuspid.
Petersen J; Neumann N; Naito S; Sequeira Gross T; Massel R; Reichenspurner H; Girdauskas E
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021 Aug; 69(5):389-395. PubMed ID: 31299697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aortic root, not valve, calcification correlates with coronary artery calcification in patients with severe aortic stenosis: A two-center study.
Henein M; Hällgren P; Holmgren A; Sörensen K; Ibrahimi P; Kofoed KF; Larsen LH; Hassager C
Atherosclerosis; 2015 Dec; 243(2):631-7. PubMed ID: 26551591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fused aortic valve without an elliptical-shaped systolic orifice in patients with severe aortic stenosis: cardiac computed tomography is useful for differentiation between bicuspid aortic valve with raphe and tricuspid aortic valve with commissural fusion.
Bak SH; Ko SM; Song MG; Shin JK; Chee HK; Kim JS
Eur Radiol; 2015 Apr; 25(4):1208-17. PubMed ID: 25424562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
