BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37137798)

  • 21. Characteristics of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease and Stenosis: The National Echo Database of Australia.
    Lim MS; Strange G; Playford D; Stewart S; Celermajer DS
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2021 Sep; 10(17):e020785. PubMed ID: 34459236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical outcomes of bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expandable valves.
    Jin Q; Chen S; Yang X; Li M; Li W; Zhang X; Zhou D; Lam YY; Ge J
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2022 Dec; 22(1):540. PubMed ID: 36503424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison Between Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Regurgitation: Presentation, Survival, and Aorta Complications.
    Yang LT; Lo HY; Lee CC; Takeuchi M; Hsu TC; Tsai CM; Michelena HI; Enriquez-Sarano M; Chen YS; Chen WJ; Ho YL
    JACC Asia; 2022 Aug; 2(4):476-486. PubMed ID: 36339359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study.
    Clavel MA; Messika-Zeitoun D; Pibarot P; Aggarwal SR; Malouf J; Araoz PA; Michelena HI; Cueff C; Larose E; Capoulade R; Vahanian A; Enriquez-Sarano M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 62(24):2329-38. PubMed ID: 24076528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Functional Aortic Root Parameters and Expression of Aortopathy in Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.
    Girdauskas E; Rouman M; Disha K; Fey B; Dubslaff G; Theis B; Petersen I; Gutberlet M; Borger MA; Kuntze T
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 67(15):1786-1796. PubMed ID: 27081018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validation of aortic valve calcium quantification thresholds measured by computed tomography in Asian patients with calcific aortic stenosis.
    Guzzetti E; Oh JK; Shen M; Dweck MR; Poh KK; Abbas AE; Mando R; Pressman GS; Brito D; Tastet L; Pawade T; Falconi ML; de Arenaza DP; Kong W; Tay E; Pibarot P; Song JK; Clavel MA
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Apr; 23(5):717-726. PubMed ID: 34172988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Magnetic resonance analysis of ventricular volumes in bicuspid and trileaflet aortic regurgitation.
    Sevilla T; Rojas G; González-Bartol E; Candela J; Gil JF; Revilla A; Aristizabal-Duque C; Gomez Salvador I; San Román Calvar JA
    Heart; 2023 Sep; 109(20):1558-1563. PubMed ID: 37230740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ex vivo assessment of valve thickness/calcification of patients with calcific aortic stenosis in relation to in vivo clinical outcomes.
    Cheng CL; Chang HH; Huang PJ; Wang WC; Lin SY
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Oct; 74():324-332. PubMed ID: 28651163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Higher rate of aortic stenosis progression in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve - A single center experience.
    Hamala P; Kasprzak JD; Lipiec P; Sobczak-Kaleta M; Wierzbowska-Drabik K
    Adv Med Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(2):343-350. PubMed ID: 34280706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN 3 for patients with severe bicuspid aortic stenosis.
    Arai T; Lefèvre T; Hovasse T; Morice MC; Romano M; Benamer H; Garot P; Hayashida K; Bouvier E; Chevalier B
    J Cardiol; 2017 Sep; 70(3):220-224. PubMed ID: 28209261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of bicuspid aortic valve phenotype on progression of aortic stenosis.
    Shen M; Tastet L; Capoulade R; Arsenault M; Bédard É; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jul; 21(7):727-734. PubMed ID: 32386199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of aortic root geometry with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve: real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic study.
    Shibayama K; Harada K; Berdejo J; Tanaka J; Mihara H; Itabashi Y; Shiota T
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Nov; 27(11):1143-52. PubMed ID: 25155517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computed tomography characteristics of the aortic valve and the geometry of SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.
    Kawamori H; Yoon SH; Chakravarty T; Maeno Y; Kashif M; Israr S; Abramowitz Y; Mangat G; Miyasaka M; Rami T; Kazuno Y; Takahashi N; Jilaihawi H; Nakamura M; Cheng W; Friedman J; Berman D; Sharma R; Makkar RR
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Dec; 19(12):1408-1418. PubMed ID: 29315371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measurement of the ascending aorta diameter in patients with severe bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve stenosis using dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography.
    Son JY; Ko SM; Choi JW; Song MG; Hwang HK; Lee SJ; Kang JW
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Dec; 27 Suppl 1():61-71. PubMed ID: 22009020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of multislice computed tomography findings between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Watanabe Y; Chevalier B; Hayashida K; Leong T; Bouvier E; Arai T; Farge A; Hovasse T; Garot P; Cormier B; Morice MC; Lefèvre T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 25594190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bicuspid Aortic Valve Anatomy and Relationship With Devices: The BAVARD Multicenter Registry.
    Tchetche D; de Biase C; van Gils L; Parma R; Ochala A; Lefevre T; Hovasse T; De Backer O; Sondergaard L; Bleiziffer S; Lange R; Kornowski R; Landes U; Norgaard BL; Biasco L; Philippart R; Molina-Martin de Nicolas J; Mylotte D; Lemee C; Dumonteil N; Van Mieghem NM
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jan; 12(1):e007107. PubMed ID: 30626202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prediction of Aortic Stenosis Progression by
    Murtazalieva P; Ryzhkova D; Malev E; Zhiduleva E; Moiseeva O
    Front Pharmacol; 2022; 13():909975. PubMed ID: 35685632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stenotic Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves - Micro-Computed Tomography and Biological Indices of Calcification.
    Mazur P; Wypasek E; Gawęda B; Sobczyk D; Kapusta P; Natorska J; Malinowski KP; Tarasiuk J; Bochenek M; Wroński S; Chmielewska K; Kapelak B; Undas A
    Circ J; 2017 Jun; 81(7):1043-1050. PubMed ID: 28344201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of the aortic valve calcium content in the bicuspid and tricuspid stenotic aortic valve using non-enhanced 64-detector-row-computed tomography with prospective ECG-triggering.
    Ferda J; Linhartová K; Kreuzberg B
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3):471-5. PubMed ID: 17961946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cardiac Mechanics in Isolated Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease With Normal Ejection Fraction: A Study of Various Valvular Lesion Types.
    Zhang X; Zhu M; He T; Yuan J; Zhu H; Morrisroe DE; Ashraf M; Sahn DJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Nov; 94(47):e2085. PubMed ID: 26632719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.