These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37138306)

  • 1. Airway dimensional changes following bone anchored maxillary protraction: a systematic review.
    Adel SM; Abbas BA; Marzouk WW; Zaher AR
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 May; 23(1):260. PubMed ID: 37138306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
    Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Upper airway changes in Class III patients using miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction with hybrid and hyrax expanders: a randomized controlled trial.
    Miranda F; Garib D; Pugliese F; da Cunha Bastos JC; Janson G; Palomo JM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):183-195. PubMed ID: 34041608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate and Class III malocclusion.
    Ren Y; Steegman R; Dieters A; Jansma J; Stamatakis H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2429-2441. PubMed ID: 30306334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment effect of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in growing patients compared to controls: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Cornelis MA; Tepedino M; Riis NV; Niu X; Cattaneo PM
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Jan; 43(1):51-68. PubMed ID: 32815989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional comparative evaluation of customized bone-anchored vs tooth-borne maxillary protraction in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Liang S; Wang F; Chang Q; Bai Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Sep; 160(3):374-384. PubMed ID: 34172344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Meta-analysis of the efficacy of bone anchorage and maxillary facemask protraction devices in treating skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion in adolescents].
    Shi H; Ge HS; Chen LY; Li ZH
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 38(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 32037769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dentoalveolar and arch dimension changes in patients treated with miniplate-anchored maxillary protraction.
    Elnagar MH; Elshourbagy E; Ghobashy S; Khedr M; Evans CA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1092-1106. PubMed ID: 28554455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of 2 skeletally anchored maxillary protraction protocols.
    Elnagar MH; Elshourbagy E; Ghobashy S; Khedr M; Evans CA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):751-762. PubMed ID: 27871701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Foersch M; Jacobs C; Wriedt S; Hechtner M; Wehrbein H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jul; 19(6):1181-92. PubMed ID: 25982454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corticotomy-assisted maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage and Class III elastics.
    Yilmaz HN; Garip H; Satilmis T; Kucukkeles N
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 24913740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Class III Treatment with Skeletal and Dental Anchorage: A Review of Comparative Effects.
    Clemente R; Contardo L; Greco C; Di Lenarda R; Perinetti G
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():7946019. PubMed ID: 30057910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction.
    Hino CT; Cevidanes LH; Nguyen TT; De Clerck HJ; Franchi L; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):705-14. PubMed ID: 24182587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maxillary protraction with miniplates providing skeletal anchorage in a growing Class III patient.
    Cha BK; Choi DS; Ngan P; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Kim SM; Jang IS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 21195283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orthopedic protraction with skeletal anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and hypodontia.
    Kircelli BH; Pektaş ZO; Uçkan S
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jan; 76(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 16448286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of maxillary protraction appliances on airway dimensions in growing class III maxillary retrognathic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ming Y; Hu Y; Li Y; Yu J; He H; Zheng L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 105():138-145. PubMed ID: 29447802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Bayesian network meta-analysis of orthopaedic treatment in Class III malocclusion: Maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage or a rapid maxillary expander.
    Wu Z; Zhang X; Li Z; Liu Y; Jin H; Chen Q; Guo J
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2020 Feb; 23(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 31452316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dentoskeletal comparison of miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction with hybrid and conventional hyrax expanders: A randomized clinical trial.
    Miranda F; Cunha Bastos JCD; Magno Dos Santos A; Janson G; Pereira Lauris JR; Garib D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Dec; 160(6):774-783. PubMed ID: 34509329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional assessment of soft tissue changes associated with bone-anchored maxillary protraction protocols.
    Elnagar MH; Elshourbagy E; Ghobashy S; Khedr M; Kusnoto B; Evans CA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):336-347. PubMed ID: 28863914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.