These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37139683)

  • 1. The equivalent threshold sound pressure levels and test-retest threshold variability of a consumer-grade insert earphone fitted with stock, foam, and otoacoustic emission probe ear tips.
    Seluakumaran K; Kamal Azizi A; Kulasegarah J
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Jul; 63(7):551-559. PubMed ID: 37139683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Equivalent threshold sound pressure levels (ETSPL) for Sennheiser HDA 280 supra-aural audiometric earphones in the frequency range 125 Hz to 8000 Hz.
    Poulsen T; Oakley S
    Int J Audiol; 2009 May; 48(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 19842802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Equivalent hearing threshold levels for the Etymotic Research ER-10C otoacoustic emission probe.
    Zebian M; Hensel J; Fedtke T; Vollbort S
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):564-8. PubMed ID: 22537036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Two Circumaural Earphones for Audiometry.
    Smull CC; Madsen B; Margolis RH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):177-183. PubMed ID: 29742546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. One-eartip solution for pure-tone audiometry and acoustic immittance measurements: using insert earphone with an immittance probe ear tip.
    Ramatsoma H; Koekemoer D; Clark JL; Malan K
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Mar; 61(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 34120555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Equivalent hearing threshold levels for the RadioEar IP30 insert earphone and short-term stimuli: comparison of peak-equivalent and RMS-based measures.
    Fedtke T; Bug MU
    Int J Audiol; 2020 May; 59(5):398-402. PubMed ID: 31657255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone and Etymotic Research ER-2 insert earphone in the frequency range 125 Hz to 16 kHz.
    Han LA; Poulsen T
    Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 9638829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How does the sound pressure generated by circumaural, supra-aural, and insert earphones differ for adult and infant ears?
    Voss SE; Herrmann BS
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):636-50. PubMed ID: 16377999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of the Sennheiser HDA 280-CL circumaural headphone for use in audiometric testing.
    Folkeard P; Hawkins M; Scollie S; Sheikh B; Parsa V
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Jul; 58(7):427-433. PubMed ID: 30957582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration.
    Lee J; Dhar S; Abel R; Banakis R; Grolley E; Lee J; Zecker S; Siegel J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):315-29. PubMed ID: 22436407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-frequency thresholds: circumaural earphone versus insert earphone.
    Valente M; Valente M; Goebel J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Nov; 3(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 1486204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Earphones in extended high-frequency audiometry and ISO 389-5.
    Rodríguez Valiente A; García Berrocal JR; Roldán Fidalgo A; Trinidad A; Ramírez Camacho R
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):595-603. PubMed ID: 24793886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Affordable headphones for accessible screening audiometry: An evaluation of the Sennheiser HD202 II supra-aural headphone.
    Van der Aerschot M; Swanepoel de W; Mahomed-Asmail F; Myburgh HC; Eikelboom RH
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):616-22. PubMed ID: 27610920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Forward- and Emitted-Pressure Calibrations on the Variability of Otoacoustic Emission Measurements Across Repeated Probe Fits.
    Maxim T; Shera CA; Charaziak KK; Abdala C
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1345-1358. PubMed ID: 30882535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Equivalent threshold sound pressure levels (ETSPLs) for RadioEar DD65v2 circumaural audiometric headphones.
    Bug MU; Fedtke T
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Aug; 59(8):624-630. PubMed ID: 32069129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of inter-aural attenuation with the Etymotic ER-3A insert earphone and the Telephonics TDH-39 supra-aural earphone.
    Munro KJ; Agnew N
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 10509860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test-retest variability in audiometric threshold with supraaural and insert earphones among children and adults.
    Stuart A; Stenstrom R; Tompkins C; Vandenhoff S
    Audiology; 1991; 30(2):82-90. PubMed ID: 1877901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Middle ear pathology can affect the ear-canal sound pressure generated by audiologic earphones.
    Voss SE; Rosowski JJ; Merchant SN; Thornton AR; Shera CA; Peake WT
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 10981602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.