144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37140176)
1. Strength of target source segregation cues affects the outcome of speech-on-speech masking experiments.
Roverud E; Villard S; Kidd G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 May; 153(5):2780. PubMed ID: 37140176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interaural level differences do not suffice for restoring spatial release from masking in simulated cochlear implant listening.
Ihlefeld A; Litovsky RY
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45296. PubMed ID: 23028914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Word Identification With Temporally Interleaved Competing Sounds by Younger and Older Adult Listeners.
Helfer KS; Poissant SF; Merchant GR
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):603-614. PubMed ID: 31567564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cochlear Implant Facilitates the Use of Talker Sex and Spatial Cues to Segregate Competing Speech in Unilaterally Deaf Listeners.
Chen J; Shi Y; Kong Y; Chen B; Zhang L; Galvin JJ; Li Y; Fu QJ
Ear Hear; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 35733275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Release from perceptual masking for children and adults: benefit of a carrier phrase.
Bonino AY; Leibold LJ; Buss E
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 22836239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of presentation level on speech-on-speech masking by voice-gender difference and spatial separation between talkers.
Oh Y; Friggle P; Kinder J; Tilbrook G; Bridges SE
Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1282764. PubMed ID: 38192513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.
Brungart DS; Simpson BD; Ericson MA; Scott KR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2527-38. PubMed ID: 11757942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tonal Language Speakers Are Better Able to Segregate Competing Speech According to Talker Sex Differences.
Zhang J; Wang X; Wang NY; Fu X; Gan T; Galvin JJ; Willis S; Xu K; Thomas M; Fu QJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Aug; 63(8):2801-2810. PubMed ID: 32692939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
Jones JA; Freyman RL
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Energetic and Informational Components of Speech-on-Speech Masking in Binaural Speech Intelligibility and Perceived Listening Effort.
Rennies J; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519854597. PubMed ID: 31172880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effects of Uncertainty in Level on Speech-on-Speech Masking.
Byrne AJ; Conroy C; Kidd G
Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221077555. PubMed ID: 35238259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Divided listening in the free field becomes asymmetric when acoustic cues are limited.
Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108444. PubMed ID: 35078133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors underlying masking release by voice-gender differences and spatial separation cues in multi-talker listening environments in listeners with and without hearing loss.
Oh Y; Hartling CL; Srinivasan NK; Diedesch AC; Gallun FJ; Reiss LAJ
Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():1059639. PubMed ID: 36507363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of fundamental-frequency and sentence-onset differences on speech-identification performance of young and older adults in a competing-talker background.
Lee JH; Humes LE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1700-17. PubMed ID: 22978898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
Westermann A; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial Release From Informational Masking: Evidence From Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy.
Zhang M; Mary Ying YL; Ihlefeld A
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518817464. PubMed ID: 30558491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contribution of Stimulus Variability to Word Recognition in Noise Versus Two-Talker Speech for School-Age Children and Adults.
Buss E; Calandruccio L; Oleson J; Leibold LJ
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):313-322. PubMed ID: 32881723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Masker Head Orientation, Listener Age, and Extended High-Frequency Sensitivity on Speech Recognition in Spatially Separated Speech.
Braza MD; Corbin NE; Buss E; Monson BB
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 34260434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech.
Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Helfer KS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1627-37. PubMed ID: 19045654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Effect of Sound Localization on Auditory-Only and Audiovisual Speech Recognition in a Simulated Multitalker Environment.
Sheffield SW; Wheeler HJ; Brungart DS; Bernstein JGW
Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231186040. PubMed ID: 37415497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
