These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37140176)

  • 21. Tuning in the spatial dimension: evidence from a masked speech identification task.
    Marrone N; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1146-58. PubMed ID: 18681603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.
    Goupell MJ; Stoelb CA; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spatial Release from Masking Using Clinical Corpora: Sentence Recognition in a Colocated or Spatially Separated Speech Masker.
    King G; Corbin NE; Leibold LJ; Buss E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Apr; 31(4):271-276. PubMed ID: 31589139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stimulus factors influencing spatial release from speech-on-speech masking.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Marrone N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1965-78. PubMed ID: 20968368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Maturation of Speech-in-Speech Recognition for Whispered and Voiced Speech.
    Buss E; Miller MK; Leibold LJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Aug; 65(8):3117-3128. PubMed ID: 35868232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Listening to every other word: examining the strength of linkage variables in forming streams of speech.
    Kidd G; Best V; Mason CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3793-802. PubMed ID: 19206805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Children's use of spatial and visual cues for release from perceptual masking.
    Lalonde K; Peng ZE; Halverson DM; Dwyer GA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Feb; 155(2):1559-1569. PubMed ID: 38393738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Roverud E; Swaminathan J; Jennings T; Clayton K; Steven Colburn H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jan; 145(1):440. PubMed ID: 30710924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Target identification using relative level in multi-talker listening.
    Kitterick PT; Clarke E; O'Shea C; Seymour J; Summerfield AQ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2899-909. PubMed ID: 23654395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
    Leibold LJ; Yarnell Bonino A; Buss E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech.
    Calandruccio L; Buss E; Bowdrie K
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517709385. PubMed ID: 29169315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Developmental Effects in Masking Release for Speech-in-Speech Perception Due to a Target/Masker Sex Mismatch.
    Leibold LJ; Buss E; Calandruccio L
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):935-945. PubMed ID: 29369288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Short Implicit Voice Training Affects Listening Effort During a Voice Cue Sensitivity Task With Vocoder-Degraded Speech.
    Biçer A; Koelewijn T; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):900-916. PubMed ID: 36695603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Swaminathan J
    Trends Hear; 2015 Jun; 19():. PubMed ID: 26126896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal.
    Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):664-76. PubMed ID: 12186046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Delayed Stream Segregation in Older Adults: More Than Just Informational Masking.
    Ezzatian P; Li L; Pichora-Fuller K; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):482-4. PubMed ID: 25587669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Auditory motion as a cue for source segregation and selection in a "cocktail party" listening environment.
    Cho AY; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Sep; 152(3):1684. PubMed ID: 36182296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.