These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37140662)

  • 1. My paper has been rejected without review. What do I do now?
    Cleland J; O'Sullivan P; Kuper A
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2023 May; 28(2):323-326. PubMed ID: 37140662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Who should proof my paper?
    O'Sullivan P; Kuper A; Cleland J
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2024 Jul; 29(3):721-723. PubMed ID: 38900340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should I do a synthesis (i.e. literature review)?
    Chen HC; Kuper A; Cleland J; O'Sullivan P
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2024 May; 29(2):367-370. PubMed ID: 38634967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Who should be an author on this paper?
    Kuper A; O'Sullivan P; Cleland J
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2023 Aug; 28(3):665-668. PubMed ID: 37349496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Questions and Quandaries: How to respond to reviewer comments.
    Kuper A; O'Sullivan P; Cleland J
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2023 Mar; 28(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 36853450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. I'd like to use a questionnaire (sub-text: this will be an easy way to get data. Right?).
    Cleland J; O'Sullivan P; Kuper A
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2024 Mar; 29(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 38436879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How should I determine author order for this paper?
    Kuper A; O'Sullivan P; Cleland J
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2023 Dec; 28(5):1367-1369. PubMed ID: 38038830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Avoiding common pitfalls in mixed methods research?
    O'Sullivan P; Kuper A; Cleland J
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2024 Sep; 29(4):1071-1073. PubMed ID: 39186166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The fate of papers rejected by Australian Family Physician.
    Green R; Del Mar C
    Aust Fam Physician; 2006 Aug; 35(8):655-6. PubMed ID: 16915616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to get your paper rejected.
    Chernick V
    Pediatr Pulmonol; 2008 Mar; 43(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 18203183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction.
    Weber EJ; Katz PP; Waeckerle JF; Callaham ML
    JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2790-3. PubMed ID: 12038913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The fate of triaged and rejected manuscripts.
    Zoccali C; Amodeo D; Argiles A; Arici M; D'arrigo G; Evenepoel P; Fliser D; Fox J; Gesualdo L; Jadoul M; Ketteler M; Malyszko J; Massy Z; Mayer G; Ortiz A; Sever M; Vanholder R; Vinck C; Wanner C; Więcek A
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2015 Dec; 30(12):1947-50. PubMed ID: 26597920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections.
    Teixeira da Silva JA; Al-Khatib A; Katavić V; Bornemann-Cimenti H
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Aug; 24(4):1347-1365. PubMed ID: 28776148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Revise before review; Reject without review; Reject after review": why manuscripts are rejected.
    Caon M
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2018 Mar; 41(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 29318536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Manuscript rejection: how to submit a revision and tips on being a good peer reviewer.
    Kotsis SV; Chung KC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Apr; 133(4):958-964. PubMed ID: 24675196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of peer review on the improvement of rejected manuscripts.
    Crijns TJ; Ottenhoff JSE; Ring D
    Account Res; 2021 Nov; 28(8):517-527. PubMed ID: 33393365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. So why would my paper be rejected?
    Civil ID; Kao LS
    Injury; 2014 Sep; 45(9):1285-6. PubMed ID: 24975651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping.
    Siler K; Lee K; Bero L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jan; 112(2):360-5. PubMed ID: 25535380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. My manuscript was rejected, and now?
    Catai AM; Grossi DB; Mancini MC
    Rev Bras Fisioter; 2011; 15(4):v-vi. PubMed ID: 21971727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Successful publishing of research: An editor's view.
    DeLisi LE
    Psychiatry Res; 2019 Jul; 277():14-16. PubMed ID: 30717988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.