These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37141007)

  • 1. Do striking biases in mass inference reflect a flawed mental model of physics?
    Mitko A; Fischer J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Sep; 152(9):2636-2650. PubMed ID: 37141007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intuitive physical reasoning about objects' masses transfers to a visuomotor decision task consistent with Newtonian physics.
    Neupärtl N; Tatai F; Rothkopf CA
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Oct; 16(10):e1007730. PubMed ID: 33075051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects.
    Sanborn AN; Mansinghka VK; Griffiths TL
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Apr; 120(2):411-37. PubMed ID: 23458084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noisy perceptual expectations: Multiple object tracking benefits when objects obey features of realistic physics.
    Lau JS; Brady TF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1280-1300. PubMed ID: 32757590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inferring mass in complex scenes by mental simulation.
    Hamrick JB; Battaglia PW; Griffiths TL; Tenenbaum JB
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():61-76. PubMed ID: 27592412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Broken Physics: A Conjunction-Fallacy Effect in Intuitive Physical Reasoning.
    Ludwin-Peery E; Bramley NR; Davis E; Gureckis TM
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Dec; 31(12):1602-1611. PubMed ID: 33137265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing Bayesian and heuristic predictions of mass judgments of colliding objects.
    Sanborn AN
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():938. PubMed ID: 25206345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physical inference of falling objects involves simulation of occluded trajectories in early visual areas.
    Zbären GA; Meissner SN; Kapur M; Wenderoth N
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Jul; 44(10):4183-4196. PubMed ID: 37195021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scene variability biases our decisions, but not our perceptual estimates.
    de la Malla C; López-Moliner J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Dec; 48(12):1439-1452. PubMed ID: 36222676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What tool representation, intuitive physics, and action have in common: The brain's first-person physics engine.
    Fischer J; Mahon BZ
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2021; 38(7-8):455-467. PubMed ID: 35994054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural substrates of cognitive biases during probabilistic inference.
    Soltani A; Khorsand P; Guo C; Farashahi S; Liu J
    Nat Commun; 2016 Apr; 7():11393. PubMed ID: 27116102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Who is sensitive to selection biases in inductive reasoning?
    Hayes BK; Liew SX; Connor Desai S; Navarro DJ; Wen Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Feb; 49(2):284-300. PubMed ID: 36006725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Naturalistic embodied interactions elicit intuitive physical behaviour in accordance with Newtonian physics.
    Neupärtl N; Tatai F; Rothkopf CA
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2021; 38(7-8):440-454. PubMed ID: 34877918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reasoning about properties: A computational theory.
    Khemlani S; Johnson-Laird PN
    Psychol Rev; 2022 Mar; 129(2):289-312. PubMed ID: 34553967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the inverse reasoning account of object discovery.
    Carroll CD; Kemp C
    Cognition; 2015 Jun; 139():130-53. PubMed ID: 25824861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When it all falls down: the relationship between intuitive physics and spatial cognition.
    Mitko A; Fischer J
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 May; 5(1):24. PubMed ID: 32430546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The building blocks of intuitive physics in the mind and brain.
    Fischer J
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2021; 38(7-8):409-412. PubMed ID: 36056548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.