These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37141332)

  • 1. Laboratory evaluation of open source and commercial electrical conductivity sensor precision and accuracy: How do they compare?
    Fulton SG; Stegen JC; Kaufman MH; Dowd J; Thompson A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285092. PubMed ID: 37141332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and validation of an open-source four-pole electrical conductivity, temperature, depth sensor for in situ water quality monitoring in an estuary.
    Lauer JW; Klinger P; O'Shea S; Lee SY
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Dec; 195(1):221. PubMed ID: 36542156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved calibration functions of three capacitance probes for the measurement of soil moisture in tropical soils.
    Fares A; Abbas F; Maria D; Mair A
    Sensors (Basel); 2011; 11(5):4858-74. PubMed ID: 22163880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laboratory Calibration and Performance Evaluation of Low-Cost Capacitive and Very Low-Cost Resistive Soil Moisture Sensors.
    Adla S; Rai NK; Sri Karumanchi H; Tripathi S; Disse M; Pande S
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jan; 20(2):. PubMed ID: 31936425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Low-Cost Water Depth and Electrical Conductivity Sensor for Detecting Inputs into Urban Stormwater Networks.
    Shi B; Catsamas S; Kolotelo P; Wang M; Lintern A; Jovanovic D; Bach PM; Deletic A; McCarthy DT
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(9):. PubMed ID: 33925612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhanced Ambient Sensing Environment-A New Method for Calibrating Low-Cost Gas Sensors.
    Russell HS; Frederickson LB; Kwiatkowski S; Emygdio APM; Kumar P; Schmidt JA; Hertel O; Johnson MS
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated Low-Cost Soil Moisture Sensors: Trade-Off between Cost and Accuracy.
    Schwamback D; Persson M; Berndtsson R; Bertotto LE; Kobayashi ANA; Wendland EC
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 36904655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance evaluations of continuous glucose monitoring systems: precision absolute relative deviation is part of the assessment.
    Obermaier K; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Schoemaker M; Klötzer HM; Kirchsteiger H; Eikmeier H; del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):824-32. PubMed ID: 23911163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A miniature integrated multimodal sensor for measuring pH, EC and temperature for precision agriculture.
    Futagawa M; Iwasaki T; Murata H; Ishida M; Sawada K
    Sensors (Basel); 2012; 12(6):8338-54. PubMed ID: 22969403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing Effects of Salinity on the Performance of a Low-Cost Wireless Soil Water Sensor.
    Peddinti SR; Hopmans JW; Abou Najm M; Kisekka I
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33316968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determination of Optimal Measurement Points for Calibration Equations-Examples by RH Sensors.
    Chen HY; Chen C
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Mar; 19(5):. PubMed ID: 30857332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of Cable Force through a Fiber Bragg Grating-Type Thin Rod Vibration Sensor and Its Application.
    Zhu W; Teng W; Liu F; Wu D; Wu Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Field calibrations of soil moisture sensors in a forested watershed.
    Abbas F; Fares A; Fares S
    Sensors (Basel); 2011; 11(6):6354-69. PubMed ID: 22163959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low-Error Soil Moisture Sensor Employing Spatial Frequency Domain Transmissometry.
    Saito T; Oishi T; Inoue M; Iida S; Mihota N; Yamada A; Shimizu K; Inumochi S; Inosako K
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(22):. PubMed ID: 36433254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Continuous glucose monitoring in subcutaneous tissue using factory-calibrated sensors: a pilot study.
    Hoss U; Jeddi I; Schulz M; Budiman E; Bhogal C; McGarraugh G
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Aug; 12(8):591-7. PubMed ID: 20615099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonlinear Flow Sensor Calibration with an Accurate Syringe.
    Biselli PJC; Nóbrega RS; Soriano FG
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Jul; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 29976851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laboratory Performance of Five Selected Soil Moisture Sensors Applying Factory and Own Calibration Equations for Two Soil Media of Different Bulk Density and Salinity Levels.
    Matula S; Báťková K; Legese WL
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 Nov; 16(11):. PubMed ID: 27854263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temperature-electrical conductivity relation of water for environmental monitoring and geophysical data inversion.
    Hayashi M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2004; 96(1-3):119-28. PubMed ID: 15327152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On-field test and data calibration of a low-cost sensor for fine particles exposure assessment.
    Jiang Y; Zhu X; Chen C; Ge Y; Wang W; Zhao Z; Cai J; Kan H
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2021 Mar; 211():111958. PubMed ID: 33503545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimized star sensors laboratory calibration method using a regularization neural network.
    Zhang C; Niu Y; Zhang H; Lu J
    Appl Opt; 2018 Feb; 57(5):1067-1074. PubMed ID: 29469889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.