These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3714143)

  • 1. Dependence of ejection fraction results on choice of algorithms for a cardiac phantom.
    Cradduck TD; Busemann-Sokole E
    Nucl Med Commun; 1986 Jan; 7(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 3714143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of background correction on left ventricular ejection fraction calculation through analysis of a simple cardiac model.
    Grove DE; Stein RA; Nosil J
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(6):949-53. PubMed ID: 3796495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of 4 different algorithms for the analysis of tomographic radionuclide ventriculography using a physical, dynamic 4-chamber cardiac phantom.
    De Bondt P; Claessens T; Rys B; De Winter O; Vandenberghe S; Segers P; Verdonck P; Dierckx RA
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Jan; 46(1):165-71. PubMed ID: 15632048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of radiocardiographic methods for determination of cardiac output and right and left ventricular ejection fractions using a cardiac phantom.
    Kelbaek H; Jensen H; Madsen PV; Munck O
    Nucl Med Commun; 1987 Oct; 8(10):815-21. PubMed ID: 3431762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple-hospital survey of ejection-fraction variability using a cardiac phantom.
    Makler PT; McCarthy DM; Bergey P; Marshall K; Bourne M; Velchik M; Alavi A
    J Nucl Med; 1985 Jan; 26(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 3965656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved accuracy of ejection fraction measurements using a commercial cardiac phantom.
    Tonge CM; French AP; Peake JC; Horton PW
    Nucl Med Commun; 1986 Jan; 7(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 3714146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer modeling of planar myocardial perfusion imaging: effect of heart rate and ejection fraction on wall thickness and chamber size.
    Machac J; Levin H; Balk E; Horowitz SF
    J Nucl Med; 1986 May; 27(5):653-9. PubMed ID: 3712082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic analysis of left ventricular ejection fraction using stroke volume images.
    Nelson TR; Verba JW; Bhargava V; Shabetai R; Slutsky R
    Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 6862802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alternative method for calculating right ventricular ejection fraction from first-pass time-activity curves.
    Iwata K
    J Nucl Med; 1988 Dec; 29(12):1990-7. PubMed ID: 2848114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A realistic dynamic cardiac phantom for evaluating radionuclide ventriculography: description and initial studies with the left ventricular chamber.
    Simon TR; Walker BS; Matthiesen S; Miller C; Triebel JG; Dowdey JE; Smitherman TC
    J Nucl Med; 1989 Apr; 30(4):542-7. PubMed ID: 2544696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of regional phase delay on left ventricular performance studied by radionuclide angiography].
    Hayashi S; Tsuda T; Nagai T; Ootaki E; Hosokawa O; Watanabe K; Yazawa Y; Arai Y; Shibata A
    J Cardiogr; 1983 Jun; 13(2):265-77. PubMed ID: 6676376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of various background protocols on the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction in equilibrium radionuclide angiography.
    Taylor DN; Garvie NW; Harris D; Sharratt GP; Goddard BA; Ackery DM
    Br J Radiol; 1980 Mar; 53(627):205-9. PubMed ID: 7378676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calculation of the left ventricular ejection fraction without edge detection: application to small hearts.
    Feng B; Sitek A; Gullberg GT
    J Nucl Med; 2002 Jun; 43(6):786-94. PubMed ID: 12050324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Calculation of the left ventricular ejection fraction by gated radionuclide angiography without direct background correction.
    Gandsman EJ; Shulman RS; Tyson IB; Bough EW
    Radiology; 1982 Jul; 144(2):377-81. PubMed ID: 7089294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Left ventricular volume and ejection fraction determined by gated blood pool emission tomography.
    Underwood SR; Walton S; Laming PJ; Jarritt PH; Ell PJ; Emanuel RW; Swanton RH
    Br Heart J; 1985 Feb; 53(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 3871332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multigated radionuclide study of the total artificial heart.
    Datz FL; Christian PE; Taylor A; Hastings WL; DeVries WC
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1987; 13(4):167-70. PubMed ID: 3622562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A versatile computer simulation of the left ventricle.
    Miller TR; Epstein DM; Goldman KJ
    J Nucl Med; 1984 Dec; 25(12):1362-6. PubMed ID: 6502257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic characteristic mechanism of atrial septal defect using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and evaluation of right ventricular functions.
    Sharen GW; Zhang J; Qin C; Lv Q
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 37(1):140-147. PubMed ID: 28224424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast echo washout curves from the left ventricle: application of basic principles of indicator-dilution theory and calculation of ejection fraction.
    Rovai D; Nissen SE; Elion J; Smith M; L'Abbate A; Kwan OL; DeMaria AN
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1987 Jul; 10(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 3298357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of cardiac and renal function in children immediately after open-heart surgery: the significance of a reduced radionuclide ejection fraction (postoperative ejection fraction).
    Covitz W; Eubig C; Moore HV; Truman AT; Sellers BB; Shelnutt R; Hadden B
    Pediatr Cardiol; 1984; 5(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 6531259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.