These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Comparison of tropicamide and cyclopentolate for cycloplegic refractions in myopic adult refractive surgery patients. Hofmeister EM; Kaupp SE; Schallhorn SC J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Apr; 31(4):694-700. PubMed ID: 15899444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of infant accommodation using retinoscopy and photoretinoscopy. Gabriel GM; Mutti DO Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):208-15. PubMed ID: 19165126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the effects of cycloplegics on accommodation ability for distance vision and on the apparent near point. Rosenfield M; Linfield PB Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1986; 6(3):317-20. PubMed ID: 3822472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual discomfort and objective measures of static accommodation. Chase C; Tosha C; Borsting E; Ridder WH Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jul; 86(7):883-9. PubMed ID: 19521268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accommodative lag using dynamic retinoscopy: age norms for school-age children. McClelland JF; Saunders KJ Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Dec; 81(12):929-33. PubMed ID: 15592117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shifts in tonic accommodation after near work are related to refractive errors in children. Gwiazda J; Bauer J; Thorn F; Held R Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Mar; 15(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 7659414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of heterophoria measurement technique on the clinical accommodative convergence to accommodation ratio. Escalante JB; Rosenfield M Optometry; 2006 May; 77(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 16651213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Objective accommodation measurement with the Grand Seiko and Hartinger coincidence refractometer. Win-Hall DM; Ostrin LA; Kasthurirangan S; Glasser A Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 84(9):879-87. PubMed ID: 17873774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of cycloplegia in objective refraction. Jorge J; Queiros A; González-Méijome J; Fernandes P; Almeida JB; Parafita MA Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jul; 25(4):340-5. PubMed ID: 15953119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short-term changes in tonic accommodation. Krumholz DM; Fox RS; Ciuffreda KJ Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1986 Apr; 27(4):552-7. PubMed ID: 3957574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens. Wolffsohn JS; Hunt OA; Naroo S; Gilmartin B; Shah S; Cunliffe IA; Benson MT; Mantry S Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1230-5. PubMed ID: 16505063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of refractive error and accommodation with the photorefractor PowerRef II. Jainta S; Jaschinski W; Hoormann J Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):520-7. PubMed ID: 15491480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The relationship between tonic vergence and oculomotor stress induced by ethanol. Hogan RE; Gilmartin B Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1985; 5(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 3975043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The establishment and evaluation of the subjective measuring instrument for tonic accommodation]. Xu D; Lu F; Qu J; Jiang BC Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 29(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 15875684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]