268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37143731)
1. Comparison of cumulative live birth rates between progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in different populations.
Zhou R; Dong M; Huang L; Wang S; Fan L; Liang X; Zhang X; Liu F
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1117513. PubMed ID: 37143731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Cumulative Live Birth Rates Between Progestin and GnRH Analogues in Preimplantation Genetic Testing Cycles.
Zhou R; Dong M; Huang L; Wang S; Wang Z; Xu L; Zhang X; Liu F
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2023 Dec; 109(1):217-226. PubMed ID: 37450562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the cumulative live birth rates after 1 in vitro fertilization cycle in women using gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol vs. progestin-primed ovarian stimulation: a propensity score-matched study.
Chen H; Teng XM; Sun ZL; Yao D; Wang Z; Chen ZQ
Fertil Steril; 2022 Oct; 118(4):701-712. PubMed ID: 35940929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocol versus Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) Protocol in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Ovarian Response.
Xiao ZN; Peng JL; Yang J; Xu WM
Curr Med Sci; 2019 Jun; 39(3):431-436. PubMed ID: 31209815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the Cumulative Live Birth Rates of Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation and Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocols in Patients With Low Prognosis.
Du M; Zhang J; Li Z; Liu X; Li J; Liu W; Guan Y
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():705264. PubMed ID: 34589055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oocyte competence is comparable between progestin primed ovarian stimulation with Norethisterone acetate (NETA-PPOS) and GnRH-antagonist protocols: A matched case-control study in PGT-A cycles.
Vaiarelli A; Cimadomo D; Ruffa A; Rania E; Pittana E; Gallo C; Fiorenza A; Alviggi E; Alfano S; Carmelo R; Trabucco E; Alviggi C; Rosaria Campitiello M; Rienzi L; Maria Ubaldi F; Venturella R
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Mar; 294():4-10. PubMed ID: 38171151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of euploidy rates of blastocysts in women treated with progestins or GnRH antagonist to prevent the luteinizing hormone surge during ovarian stimulation.
La Marca A; Capuzzo M; Sacchi S; Imbrogno MG; Spinella F; Varricchio MT; Minasi MG; Greco P; Fiorentino F; Greco E
Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun; 35(6):1325-1331. PubMed ID: 32395749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of a GnRH Agonist Trigger Following a GnRH Antagonist or Flexible Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Cycle.
Kalafat E; Turkgeldi E; Yıldız S; Dizdar M; Keles I; Ata B
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():837880. PubMed ID: 35663329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) protocol yields lower euploidy rate in older patients undergoing IVF.
Pai AH; Sung YJ; Li CJ; Lin CY; Chang CL
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2023 Aug; 21(1):72. PubMed ID: 37550681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing
Yang L; Liang F; Yuan Y; Luo X; Wang Q; Yao L; Zhang X
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1224858. PubMed ID: 37795363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders: Risk of premature LH surge and outcome of oocyte retrieval.
Kao TC; Hsieh YC; Yang IJ; Wu MY; Chen MJ; Yang JH; Chen SU
J Formos Med Assoc; 2023 Jan; 122(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 36123235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized controlled trial to compare the live birth rate of the first frozen embryo transfer following the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol vs. the antagonist protocol in women with an anticipated high ovarian response.
Chen ZQ; Ai A; Zhang Y; Li H; Wang JY; Wang L; Ng EHY
Fertil Steril; 2024 Jun; 121(6):937-945. PubMed ID: 38272383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. GnRH antagonist protocol versus progestin-primed ovarian stimulation in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Deng R; Wang J; He J; Lei X; Zi D; Nong W; Lei X
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Apr; 309(4):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 37957365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Cumulative Live Birth Rates Between GnRH-A and PPOS in Low-Prognosis Patients According to POSEIDON Criteria: A Cohort Study.
Zhang S; Yin Y; Li Q; Zhang C
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():644456. PubMed ID: 34234739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation is a feasible method for poor ovarian responders undergoing in IVF/ICSI compared to a GnRH antagonist protocol: A retrospective study.
Huang P; Tang M; Qin A
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Feb; 48(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 30321608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Live birth rates after modified natural cycle compared with high-dose FSH stimulation using GnRH antagonists in poor responders.
Lainas TG; Sfontouris IA; Venetis CA; Lainas GT; Zorzovilis IZ; Tarlatzis BC; Kolibianakis EM
Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 26307091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cumulative live birth rate of in vitro fertilization cycle via progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in infertile women with normal ovarian reserve: an open-label, randomized controlled trial.
Ye H; Shi L; Quan X; Hou M; Ma H; Xue S; Yu Z; Chen Q; Sun L
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2024 Dec; 27(1):2316005. PubMed ID: 38357937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of cumulative live birth rate and perinatal outcomes in young patients with low anti-müllerian hormone levels using two ovulation promotion protocols: A cohort study.
Li Z; Jia R; Wang K; Zhang J; Ren B; Guan Y
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():938500. PubMed ID: 35992097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Versus Mild Stimulation Protocol in Advanced Age Women With Diminished Ovarian Reserve Undergoing Their First
Tu X; You B; Jing M; Lin C; Zhang R
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():801026. PubMed ID: 35140685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
