These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37143888)

  • 21. Using DNA Metabarcoding To Evaluate the Plant Component of Human Diets: a Proof of Concept.
    Reese AT; Kartzinel TR; Petrone BL; Turnbaugh PJ; Pringle RM; David LA
    mSystems; 2019 Oct; 4(5):. PubMed ID: 31594830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Plant diversity in sedimentary DNA obtained from high-latitude (Siberia) and high-elevation lakes (China).
    Stoof-Leichsenring KR; Liu S; Jia W; Li K; Pestryakova LA; Mischke S; Cao X; Liu X; Ni J; Neuhaus S; Herzschuh U
    Biodivers Data J; 2020; 8():e57089. PubMed ID: 33364896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Capturing open ocean biodiversity: Comparing environmental DNA metabarcoding to the continuous plankton recorder.
    Suter L; Polanowski AM; Clarke LJ; Kitchener JA; Deagle BE
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3140-3157. PubMed ID: 32767849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool for monitoring fish diversity in a coastal wetland of the Pearl River Estuary compared to bottom trawling.
    Zou K; Chen J; Ruan H; Li Z; Guo W; Li M; Liu L
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 702():134704. PubMed ID: 31726353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Decision-making and best practices for taxonomy-free environmental DNA metabarcoding in biomonitoring using Hill numbers.
    Mächler E; Walser JC; Altermatt F
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3326-3339. PubMed ID: 33188644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy, limitations and cost efficiency of eDNA-based community survey in tropical frogs.
    Bálint M; Nowak C; Márton O; Pauls SU; Wittwer C; Aramayo JL; Schulze A; Chambert T; Cocchiararo B; Jansen M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1415-1426. PubMed ID: 30155977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Integrating invasive species risk assessment into environmental DNA metabarcoding reference libraries.
    Mahon AR; Grey EK; Jerde CL
    Ecol Appl; 2023 Jan; 33(1):e2730. PubMed ID: 36054696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Unlocking biodiversity and conservation studies in high-diversity environments using environmental DNA (eDNA): A test with Guianese freshwater fishes.
    Cilleros K; Valentini A; Allard L; Dejean T; Etienne R; Grenouillet G; Iribar A; Taberlet P; Vigouroux R; Brosse S
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jan; 19(1):27-46. PubMed ID: 29768738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Environmental DNA from Marine Waters and Substrates: Protocols for Sampling and eDNA Extraction.
    Cowart DA; Murphy KR; Cheng CC
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2498():225-251. PubMed ID: 35727547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessing the impact of the threatened crucian carp (Carassius carassius) on pond invertebrate diversity: A comparison of conventional and molecular tools.
    Harper LR; Lawson Handley L; Sayer CD; Read DS; Benucci M; Blackman RC; Hill MJ; Hänfling B
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3252-3269. PubMed ID: 33002225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish community analysis in backwater lakes: A comparison of capture methods.
    Fujii K; Doi H; Matsuoka S; Nagano M; Sato H; Yamanaka H
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210357. PubMed ID: 30703107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities.
    Deiner K; Bik HM; Mächler E; Seymour M; Lacoursière-Roussel A; Altermatt F; Creer S; Bista I; Lodge DM; de Vere N; Pfrender ME; Bernatchez L
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Nov; 26(21):5872-5895. PubMed ID: 28921802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Environmental DNA of insects and springtails from caves reveals complex processes of eDNA transfer in soils.
    Lunghi E; Valle B; Guerrieri A; Bonin A; Cianferoni F; Manenti R; Ficetola GF
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 826():154022. PubMed ID: 35202680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. High-throughput environmental DNA analysis informs a biological assessment of an urban stream.
    Bagley M; Pilgrim E; Knapp M; Yoder C; Domingo JS; Banerji A
    Ecol Indic; 2019; 104():378-389. PubMed ID: 31275063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of stream macroinvertebrate communities with eDNA is not congruent with tissue-based metabarcoding.
    Gleason JE; Elbrecht V; Braukmann TWA; Hanner RH; Cottenie K
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3239-3251. PubMed ID: 32799390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Environmental DNA analysis as an emerging non-destructive method for plant biodiversity monitoring: a review.
    Banerjee P; Stewart KA; Dey G; Antognazza CM; Sharma RK; Maity JP; Saha S; Doi H; de Vere N; Chan MWY; Lin PY; Chao HC; Chen CY
    AoB Plants; 2022 Aug; 14(4):plac031. PubMed ID: 35990516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of soil eDNA to camera traps for assessing mammal and bird community composition and site use.
    Tetzlaff SJ; Katz AD; Wolff PJ; Kleitch ME
    Ecol Evol; 2024 Jul; 14(7):e70022. PubMed ID: 39011132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Metabarcoding monitoring analysis: the pros and cons of using co-extracted environmental DNA and RNA data to assess offshore oil production impacts on benthic communities.
    Laroche O; Wood SA; Tremblay LA; Lear G; Ellis JI; Pochon X
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3347. PubMed ID: 28533985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Identifying error and accurately interpreting environmental DNA metabarcoding results: A case study to detect vertebrates at arid zone waterholes.
    Furlan EM; Davis J; Duncan RP
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Sep; 20(5):1259-1276. PubMed ID: 32310337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparing diversity levels in environmental samples: DNA sequence capture and metabarcoding approaches using 18S and COI genes.
    Giebner H; Langen K; Bourlat SJ; Kukowka S; Mayer C; Astrin JJ; Misof B; Fonseca VG
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Sep; 20(5):1333-1345. PubMed ID: 32462738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.