These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37144449)

  • 21. Use and Interpretation of Propensity Scores in Aging Research: A Guide for Clinical Researchers.
    Kim DH; Pieper CF; Ahmed A; Colón-Emeric CS
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2016 Oct; 64(10):2065-2073. PubMed ID: 27550392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Generalized propensity score for estimating the average treatment effect of multiple treatments.
    Feng P; Zhou XH; Zou QM; Fan MY; Li XS
    Stat Med; 2012 Mar; 31(7):681-97. PubMed ID: 21351291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of the E-value in the presence of bias amplification: a simulation study.
    Barrette E; Higuera L; Wherry K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):79. PubMed ID: 38539082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies.
    Austin PC; Stuart EA
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(28):3661-79. PubMed ID: 26238958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reporting of covariate selection and balance assessment in propensity score analysis is suboptimal: a systematic review.
    Ali MS; Groenwold RH; Belitser SV; Pestman WR; Hoes AW; Roes KC; Boer Ad; Klungel OH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 25433444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Propensity scores based methods for estimating average treatment effect and average treatment effect among treated: A comparative study.
    Abdia Y; Kulasekera KB; Datta S; Boakye M; Kong M
    Biom J; 2017 Sep; 59(5):967-985. PubMed ID: 28436047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The multiple propensity score as control for bias in the comparison of more than two treatment arms: an introduction from a case study in mental health.
    Spreeuwenberg MD; Bartak A; Croon MA; Hagenaars JA; Busschbach JJ; Andrea H; Twisk J; Stijnen T
    Med Care; 2010 Feb; 48(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 20068488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.
    Austin PC; Stuart EA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1654-1670. PubMed ID: 25934643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Unicompartmental compared with total knee replacement for patients with multimorbidities: a cohort study using propensity score stratification and inverse probability weighting.
    Prats-Uribe A; Kolovos S; Berencsi K; Carr A; Judge A; Silman A; Arden N; Petersen I; Douglas IJ; Wilkinson JM; Murray D; Valderas JM; Beard DJ; Lamb SE; Ali MS; Pinedo-Villanueva R; Strauss VY; Prieto-Alhambra D
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Nov; 25(66):1-126. PubMed ID: 34812138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Variable selection for propensity score models when estimating treatment effects on multiple outcomes: a simulation study.
    Wyss R; Girman CJ; LoCasale RJ; Brookhart AM; Stürmer T
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2013 Jan; 22(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 23070806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of propensity score used in cardiovascular research: a cross-sectional survey and guidance document.
    Samuel M; Batomen B; Rouette J; Kim J; Platt RW; Brophy JM; Kaufman JS
    BMJ Open; 2020 Aug; 10(8):e036961. PubMed ID: 32847911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(25):3083-107. PubMed ID: 19757444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Characterizing Imbalance in the Tails of the Propensity Score Distribution.
    DiPrete BL; Girman CJ; Mavros P; Breskin A; Brookhart MA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 193(2):389-403. PubMed ID: 37830395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluating the performance of propensity score matching based approaches in individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Johara FT; Benedetti A; Platt R; Menzies D; Viiklepp P; Schaaf S; Chan E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):257. PubMed ID: 34814845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Propensity score matching and complex surveys.
    Austin PC; Jembere N; Chiu M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Apr; 27(4):1240-1257. PubMed ID: 27460539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluating the comparability of osteoporosis treatments using propensity score and negative control outcome methods in UK and Denmark electronic health record databases.
    Tan EH; Rathod-Mistry T; Strauss VY; O'Kelly J; Giorgianni F; Baxter R; Brunetti VC; Pedersen AB; Ehrenstein V; Prieto-Alhambra D
    J Bone Miner Res; 2024 Aug; 39(7):844-854. PubMed ID: 38619297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Matching by propensity score in cohort studies with three treatment groups.
    Rassen JA; Shelat AA; Franklin JM; Glynn RJ; Solomon DH; Schneeweiss S
    Epidemiology; 2013 May; 24(3):401-9. PubMed ID: 23532053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Weight trimming and propensity score weighting.
    Lee BK; Lessler J; Stuart EA
    PLoS One; 2011 Mar; 6(3):e18174. PubMed ID: 21483818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.
    Mugellini G; Della Bella S; Colagrossi M; Isenring GL; Killias M
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2021 Jun; 17(2):e1173. PubMed ID: 37131927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Performance evaluation of propensity score methods for estimating average treatment effects with multi-level treatments.
    Nian H; Yu C; Ding J; Wu H; Dupont WD; Brunwasser S; Gebretsadik T; Hartert TV; Wu P
    J Appl Stat; 2019; 46(5):853-873. PubMed ID: 31274945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.