These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37144522)

  • 1. How does Go/No-Go training lead to food devaluation? Separating the effects of motor inhibition and response valence.
    Houben K
    Cogn Emot; 2023; 37(4):763-776. PubMed ID: 37144522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of attention in explaining the no-go devaluation effect: Effects on appetitive food items.
    Quandt J; Holland RW; Chen Z; Veling H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1119-1133. PubMed ID: 31144856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chocolate equals stop. Chocolate-specific inhibition training reduces chocolate intake and go associations with chocolate.
    Houben K; Jansen A
    Appetite; 2015 Apr; 87():318-23. PubMed ID: 25596041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do impulsive individuals benefit more from food go/no-go training? Testing the role of inhibition capacity in the no-go devaluation effect.
    Chen Z; Veling H; Dijksterhuis A; Holland RW
    Appetite; 2018 May; 124():99-110. PubMed ID: 28442335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing Go/No-Go training effects on implicit evaluations of unhealthy and healthy snack foods.
    Wittleder S; Reinelt T; Milanowski L; Viglione C; Jay M; Oettingen G
    Psychol Health; 2024 May; 39(5):573-593. PubMed ID: 35946400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Will work less for food: Go/No-Go training decreases the reinforcing value of high-caloric food.
    Houben K; Giesen JCAH
    Appetite; 2018 Nov; 130():79-83. PubMed ID: 30077731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How does not responding to appetitive stimuli cause devaluation: Evaluative conditioning or response inhibition?
    Chen Z; Veling H; Dijksterhuis A; Holland RW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Dec; 145(12):1687-1701. PubMed ID: 27736134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When not responding to food changes food value: The role of timing.
    Liu H; Holland RW; Veling H
    Appetite; 2023 Aug; 187():106583. PubMed ID: 37121485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Training response inhibition to reduce food consumption: Mechanisms, stimulus specificity and appropriate training protocols.
    Adams RC; Lawrence NS; Verbruggen F; Chambers CD
    Appetite; 2017 Feb; 109():11-23. PubMed ID: 27838443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Double up! Examining the effects of adding inhibition training to food cue exposure in chocolate-loving female students.
    Bongers P; Houben K; Jansen A
    Appetite; 2018 Feb; 121():154-162. PubMed ID: 29154884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Explicit and Implicit Devaluation Effects of Food-Specific Response Inhibition Training.
    Tzavella L; Chambers CD
    J Cogn; 2023; 6(1):10. PubMed ID: 36721799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Devaluation of NoGo stimuli is both robust and fragile.
    Liu H; Holland RW; Blechert J; Quandt J; Veling H
    Cogn Emot; 2022 Aug; 36(5):876-893. PubMed ID: 35467479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task-irrelevant odours affect both response inhibition and response readiness in fast-paced Go/No-Go task: the case of valence.
    Albayay J; Castiello U; Parma V
    Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):19329. PubMed ID: 31852962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Combined Approach of High-Frequency rTMS and Food-Inhibition Association Training Reduces Chocolate Snack Consumption.
    Ahn HM; Ham BJ; Kim SH
    Front Psychiatry; 2019; 10():815. PubMed ID: 31803079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Affective modulation of target detection in deficit and non-deficit schizophrenia.
    DeRosse P; Gopin CB; Barber AD; Malhotra AK
    Schizophr Res; 2019 Feb; 204():138-145. PubMed ID: 30126815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Generalization of food devaluation following food-specific go/no-go training.
    Moshon-Cohen TE; Bitan T; Weinbach N
    Eat Behav; 2024 Aug; 54():101902. PubMed ID: 38971023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanisms underlying food devaluation after response inhibition to food.
    Saad M; Bohon C; Weinbach N
    Appetite; 2024 Aug; 199():107387. PubMed ID: 38692510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Valuation of Go Stimuli or Devaluation of No-Go Stimuli? Evidence of an Increased Preference for Attended Go Stimuli Following a Go/No-Go Task.
    Inoue K; Sato N
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():474. PubMed ID: 28439246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Training inhibitory control. A recipe for resisting sweet temptations.
    Houben K; Jansen A
    Appetite; 2011 Apr; 56(2):345-9. PubMed ID: 21185896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unravelling the dynamics of response force: Investigating motor restraint and motor cancellation through go/no-go and stop-signal tasks.
    Wang Z; Liu X; Li X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jan; ():17470218231219867. PubMed ID: 38044387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.