These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37144567)

  • 1. Growing pains: strategies for improving ergonomics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.
    Lin E; Young R; Shields J; Smith K; Chao L
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Aug; 35(4):361-367. PubMed ID: 37144567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic ergonomic risk.
    Monfared S; Athanasiadis DI; Umana L; Hernandez E; Asadi H; Colgate CL; Yu D; Stefanidis D
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Nov; 36(11):8397-8402. PubMed ID: 35182219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ergonomics in gynecologic surgery.
    Catanzarite T; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Dec; 30(6):432-440. PubMed ID: 30299323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ergonomics in Surgery: A Review.
    Catanzarite T; Tan-Kim J; Whitcomb EL; Menefee S
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 28914699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ergonomics: making the OR a comfortable place.
    Cardenas-Trowers O; Kjellsson K; Hatch K
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jul; 29(7):1065-1066. PubMed ID: 30298292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ergonomic Assessment of Surgeon Characteristics and Laparoscopic Device Strain in Gynecologic Surgery.
    Wong JMK; Moore KJ; Lewis P; Reid M; Saul K; Carey ET
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Dec; 29(12):1357-1363. PubMed ID: 36191883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of postural ergonomics between laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy: a pilot study.
    Tarr ME; Brancato SJ; Cunkelman JA; Polcari A; Nutter B; Kenton K
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 25315401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bariatric Surgeon Ergonomics: A Comparison of Laparoscopy and Robotics.
    Hilt L; Sherman B; Tan WH; Lak K; Gould JC; Kindel TL; Higgins RM
    J Surg Res; 2024 Mar; 295():864-873. PubMed ID: 37968140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic assisted surgery reduces ergonomic risk during minimally invasive colorectal resection: the VOLCANO randomised controlled trial.
    Dixon F; Vitish-Sharma P; Khanna A; Keeler BD;
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2024 Apr; 409(1):142. PubMed ID: 38676748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.
    Choussein S; Srouji SS; Farland LV; Wietsma A; Missmer SA; Hollis M; Yu RN; Pozner CN; Gargiulo AR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28734971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigation of the Association between Surgeon Sex and Laparoscopic Device Ergonomic Strain in Gynecologic Surgery.
    Wong JMK; Moore KJ; Carey ET
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):984-991. PubMed ID: 35513300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ergonomics in the operating room: protecting the surgeon.
    Rosenblatt PL; McKinney J; Adams SR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):744. PubMed ID: 23969139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A systematic review of the true benefit of robotic surgery: Ergonomics.
    Wee IJY; Kuo LJ; Ngu JC
    Int J Med Robot; 2020 Aug; 16(4):e2113. PubMed ID: 32304167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery.
    Truong M; Kim JH; Scheib S; Patzkowsky K
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 28(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 27362711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does a robotic surgery approach offer optimal ergonomics to gynecologic surgeons?: a comprehensive ergonomics survey study in gynecologic robotic surgery.
    Lee MR; Lee GI
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Sep; 28(5):e70. PubMed ID: 28657231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive surgery and the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: Results of a survey among Israeli surgeons and review of the literature.
    Michael S; Mintz Y; Brodie R; Assalia A
    Work; 2022; 71(3):779-785. PubMed ID: 35253672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ergonomic Robotic Console Configuration in Gynecologic Surgery: An Interventional Study.
    Hokenstad ED; Hallbeck MS; Lowndes BR; Morrow MM; Weaver AL; McGree M; Glaser GE; Occhino JA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):850-859. PubMed ID: 32735942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ergonomic deficits in robotic gynecologic oncology surgery: a need for intervention.
    Craven R; Franasiak J; Mosaly P; Gehrig PA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(5):648-55. PubMed ID: 23747116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decreasing strain on the surgeon in gynecologic minimally invasive surgery by using semi-active robotics.
    Tchartchian G; Dietzel J; Bojahr B; Hackethal A; De Wilde R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Jan; 112(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 20947079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of Obesity on Surgeon Ergonomics in Robotic and Straight-Stick Laparoscopic Surgery.
    Moss EL; Sarhanis P; Ind T; Smith M; Davies Q; Zecca M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(5):1063-1069. PubMed ID: 31326633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.