These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37145619)

  • 1. Familiarity Trends of Successful Urology Residency Match Applicants.
    O'Connor RC; Engelsgjerd S; Koraym A; Wong M; Sandlow JI
    Urol Pract; 2021 Mar; 8(2):298-302. PubMed ID: 37145619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of residency match information disseminated by a third-party website.
    Kutikov A; Morgan TM; Resnick MJ
    J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 19896626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The COVID-19 Residency Application Cycle Did Not Affect Geographic Dispersal Patterns Among Applicants Entering the Urology Match: A Quantitative Mapping Study.
    Gabrielson AT; Meilchen CK; Kohn JR; Kohn TP
    Urology; 2021 Dec; 158():26-32. PubMed ID: 34324912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What COVID Restrictions Have Taught Us About Visiting Subinternships.
    Zitkovsky HS; Kuhn NL; Guo L
    Ann Plast Surg; 2023 May; 90(5):478-481. PubMed ID: 37146313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does Geographical Bias Impact the Match for General Surgery Residents?
    Dhar VK; Hanseman DJ; Young G; Browne D; Makley AT; Sussman JJ; Goodman MD
    J Surg Educ; 2020; 77(2):260-266. PubMed ID: 31677980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Impact of COVID-19 on Plastic Surgery Home Program Match Rates.
    Faletsky A; Zitkovsky H; Guo L
    Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Jan; 88(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 34393193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Defining the Current Landscape of Women in Urology: An Analysis of Female Applicants, Residents, and Faculty at AUA-Accredited Residency Programs.
    Findlay BL; Manka MG; Bole R; Dodge NA; Thompson RH; Granberg CF
    Urology; 2021 Feb; 148():59-63. PubMed ID: 33301743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
    Asadourian PA; Murphy AI; Marano AA; Rohde CH; Wu JK
    J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(6):1923-1929. PubMed ID: 34210645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Financial burden associated with the residency match in neurological surgery.
    Agarwal N; Choi PA; Okonkwo DO; Barrow DL; Friedlander RM
    J Neurosurg; 2017 Jan; 126(1):184-190. PubMed ID: 27058197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disparate Responses in Match Outcome across Competitive Surgical Subspecialties to Pandemic Era Constraints: An Analysis of Impacts of Minimal Auditions.
    Faletsky A; Zitkovsky H; Guo L
    J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(1):243-248. PubMed ID: 34366285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterization of Applicant Preference Signals, Invitations for Interviews, and Inclusion on Match Lists for Residency Positions in Urology.
    Grauer R; Ranti D; Greene K; Gorin MA; Menon M; Zorc S
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jan; 6(1):e2250974. PubMed ID: 36662528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orphan Applicants in Plastic Surgery: Where Do Medical Students Without an Affiliated Residency Program Match?
    Rostam Kadivar Shahriari S; Whisonant C; Ederle A; Borah G
    Eplasty; 2022; 22():e21. PubMed ID: 35903429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Financial Burden of Applying to Urology Residency in 2020.
    Tabakin AL; Srivastava A; Polotti CF; Gupta NK
    Urology; 2021 Aug; 154():62-67. PubMed ID: 33476604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Staying Close to Home: The Effects of COVID-19 on the Plastic Surgery Residency Match.
    Hollins AW; Zhang GX; Stoehr JR; Atia A; Sergesketter AR; Wickenheisser VA; Ko JH; Phillips BT
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2021 Sep; 9(9):e3864. PubMed ID: 34595084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geographic Trends in the Orthopedic Surgery Residency Match.
    Cox RM; Sobel AD; Biercevicz A; Eberson CP; Mulcahey MK
    J Grad Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 10(4):423-428. PubMed ID: 30154974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disparity in Opportunities: Is It Harder to Match Into Plastic Surgery Residency Without a Home Plastic Surgery Division?
    Baghchechi M; Oviedo P; McLean P; Dean R; Dobke M
    Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Oct; 87(4):384-388. PubMed ID: 34139740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preference Signaling and Virtual Interviews: The New Urology Residency Match.
    Carpinito GP; Badia RR; Khouri RK; Ganesan V; Kenigsberg AP; Hudak SJ; Lemack GE
    Urology; 2023 Jan; 171():35-40. PubMed ID: 36332703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Future is Female: The Influence of Female Faculty and Resident Representation on Female Applicant Match Rate Amongst Urology Residency Programs Over 3 Years.
    Kapur A; Hung M; Wang K; Gross M; Lee W; Weissbart S; Kim J
    Urology; 2022 Feb; 160():46-50. PubMed ID: 34740713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the accessibility and content of urology residency websites.
    Nocera AP; Boudreau HS; Boyd CJ; Martin KD; Rais-Bahrami S
    Urol Ann; 2022; 14(4):322-327. PubMed ID: 36506000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preference Signaling in the 2022 Urology Residency Match - The Applicant Perspective.
    Leopold Z; Rajagopalan A; Mikhail M; Lee G; Tabakin A; Park JH; Jang T; Elsamra SE; Singer EA
    Urology; 2022 Dec; 170():33-37. PubMed ID: 36195167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.