BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37145996)

  • 1. Deep learning denoising of digital breast tomosynthesis: Observer performance study of the effect on detection of microcalcifications in breast phantom images.
    Chan HP; Helvie MA; Gao M; Hadjiiski L; Zhou C; Garver K; Klein KA; McLaughlin C; Oudsema R; Rahman WT; Roubidoux MA
    Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6177-6189. PubMed ID: 37145996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Dose Level on Radiologists' Detection of Microcalcifications in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: An Observer Study with Breast Phantoms.
    Chan HP; Helvie MA; Klein KA; McLaughlin C; Neal CH; Oudsema R; Rahman WT; Roubidoux MA; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Samala RK
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S42-S49. PubMed ID: 32950384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model-based deep CNN-regularized reconstruction for digital breast tomosynthesis with a task-based CNN image assessment approach.
    Gao M; Fessler JA; Chan HP
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Dec; 68(24):. PubMed ID: 37988758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance of clustered microcalcification detection on breast phantom images acquired with an experimental system using variable scan angles, angular increments, and number of projection views.
    Chan HP; Goodsitt MM; Helvie MA; Zelakiewicz S; Schmitz A; Noroozian M; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Nees AV; Neal CH; Carson P; Lu Y; Hadjiiski L; Wei J
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):675-85. PubMed ID: 25007048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deep Convolutional Neural Network With Adversarial Training for Denoising Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.
    Gao M; Fessler JA; Chan HP
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2021 Jul; 40(7):1805-1816. PubMed ID: 33729933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems.
    Peters S; Hellmich M; Stork A; Kemper J; Grinstein O; Püsken M; Stahlhut L; Kinner S; Maintz D; Krug KB
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 27861206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multichannel response analysis on 2D projection views for detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Wei J; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Lu Y; Zhou C; Samala R
    Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041913. PubMed ID: 24694144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A deep learning approach to estimate x-ray scatter in digital breast tomosynthesis: From phantom models to clinical applications.
    Pinto MC; Mauter F; Michielsen K; Biniazan R; Kappler S; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 50(8):4744-4757. PubMed ID: 37394837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective-diffusion regularization for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
    Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6003-14. PubMed ID: 21158312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Penalized maximum likelihood reconstruction for improved microcalcification detection in breast tomosynthesis.
    Das M; Gifford HC; O'Connor JM; Glick SJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Apr; 30(4):904-14. PubMed ID: 21041158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Wei J; Zhou C; Lu Y
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 22225272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in multiscale bilateral filtering regularized reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volume.
    Samala RK; Chan HP; Lu Y; Hadjiiski L; Wei J; Sahiner B; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021901. PubMed ID: 24506622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing image quality of five breast tomosynthesis systems based on radiologists' reviews of phantom data.
    Sundell VM; Jousi M; Mäkelä T; Kaasalainen T; Hukkinen K
    Acta Radiol; 2023 May; 64(5):1799-1807. PubMed ID: 36437753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A four-alternative forced choice (4AFC) methodology for evaluating microcalcification detection in clinical full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems using an inkjet-printed anthropomorphic phantom.
    Ikejimba LC; Salad J; Graff CG; Ghammraoui B; Cheng WC; Lo JY; Glick SJ
    Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3883-3892. PubMed ID: 31135960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiscale bilateral filtering for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Samala RK
    Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):182-95. PubMed ID: 25563259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions.
    Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Goodsitt M; Carson PL; Hadjiiski L; Schmitz A; Eberhard JW; Claus BE
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5703-12. PubMed ID: 21992385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of synthetic and digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis or alone for the detection and classification of microcalcifications.
    Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Kim GR; Ko ES; Park KW
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):319-329. PubMed ID: 29931560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography using a hybrid performance test.
    Cockmartin L; Marshall NW; Van Ongeval C; Aerts G; Stalmans D; Zanca F; Shaheen E; De Keyzer F; Dance DR; Young KC; Bosmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 May; 60(10):3939-58. PubMed ID: 25909596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact on lesion detection via a multi-vendor study: A phantom-based comparison of digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and synthetic mammography.
    Vancoillie L; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2021 Oct; 48(10):6270-6292. PubMed ID: 34407213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.