These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37146083)

  • 21. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
    Kaleli N; Sarac D; Külünk S; Öztürk Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28645667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In Silico Finite Element Analysis of Implant-Supported CAD-CAM Resin Composite Crowns.
    Karaer O; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Terzioglu H
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):259-266. PubMed ID: 35509150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Parafunctional loading and occlusal device on stress distribution around implants: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Borges Radaelli MT; Idogava HT; Spazzin AO; Noritomi PY; Boscato N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):565-572. PubMed ID: 29724560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of stress/strain in dental implants and abutments of alternative materials compared to conventional titanium alloy-3D non-linear finite element analysis.
    Tretto PHW; Dos Santos MBF; Spazzin AO; Pereira GKR; Bacchi A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Jun; 23(8):372-383. PubMed ID: 32116034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
    Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative analysis of stress distribution around CFR‑PEEK implants and titanium implants with different prosthetic crowns: A finite element analysis.
    Tamrakar SK; Mishra SK; Chowdhary R; Rao S
    Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(3):359-367. PubMed ID: 34597479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stress distribution in the abutment and retention screw of a single implant supporting a prosthesis with platform switching.
    Alvarez-Arenal A; Segura-Mori L; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; Gago A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(3):e112-21. PubMed ID: 23748329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of Abutment Collar Height and Implant Length on Stress Distribution in Single Crowns.
    Bordin D; Cury AADB; Faot F
    Braz Dent J; 2019 Jun; 30(3):238-243. PubMed ID: 31166395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of various occlusal materials on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: a three-dimensional finite-element study.
    Sevimay M; Usumez A; Eskitascioglu G
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2005 Apr; 73(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 15742379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio, retention system, restorative material, and occlusal loading on stress concentrations in single short implants.
    Sotto-Maior BS; Senna PM; da Silva WJ; Rocha EP; Del Bel Cury AA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):e13-8. PubMed ID: 22616067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants.
    de Matos JDM; Lopes GDRS; Nakano LJN; Ramos NC; Vasconcelos JEL; Bottino MA; Tribst JPM
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2022 Feb; 25(3):239-246. PubMed ID: 34559574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biomechanical influence of narrow-diameter implants placed at the crestal and subcrestal level in the maxillary anterior region. A 3D finite element analysis.
    Cruz RS; Fernandes E Oliveira HF; Lemos CAA; de Souza Batista VE; Capalbo da Silva R; Verri FR
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 33(2):180-187. PubMed ID: 36799260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Influence of Bone Quality on the Biomechanical Behavior of a Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Denture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Tsouknidas A; Giannopoulos D; Savvakis S; Michailidis N; Lympoudi E; Fytanidis D; Pissiotis A; Michalakis K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):e143-e154. PubMed ID: 27861651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stress distribution in resin-based CAD-CAM implant-supported crowns.
    Ausiello P; Di Lauro AE; Tribst JPM; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2023 Jan; 39(1):114-122. PubMed ID: 36566152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Morse taper performance: A finite element analysis study.
    Petris GP; De Carli JP; Paranhos LR; Santos PL; Benetti P; Walber M; Linden ES; Linden MSS
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2019 Mar; 74():e852. PubMed ID: 30916212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
    Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of different implant designs on replacement of four teeth of the posterior free-end edentulism: Three-dimensional finite element analysis and clinic case validation.
    Ye Z; Ye H; Jiang Z; Wu S; Feng Z; Liu H; Wang X; Lan R; Lin X; Ding C; Zhang Q; Ding X; Wu L
    Ann Anat; 2023 Aug; 249():152111. PubMed ID: 37247761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of crown retention systems and loading direction on the stress magnitude of posterior implant-supported restorations: A 3D-FEA.
    Tribst JPM; de Jager N; Dal Piva AMO; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer A
    Heliyon; 2024 Mar; 10(6):e28129. PubMed ID: 38515675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of abutment screw preload in two implant connection systems: A 3D finite element study.
    Jung WK; Lee WS; Kwon HB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):474.e1-474.e8. PubMed ID: 31590980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.