145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37146098)
21. Quality of administrative health databases in Canada: A scoping review.
Hinds A; Lix LM; Smith M; Quan H; Sanmartin C
Can J Public Health; 2016 Jun; 107(1):e56-e61. PubMed ID: 27348111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Validation of congenital anomaly coding in Canada's administrative databases compared with a congenital anomaly registry.
Metcalfe A; Sibbald B; Lowry RB; Tough S; Bernier FP
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2014 Feb; 100(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 24307632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Systematic Review of Case-Identification Algorithms Based on Italian Healthcare Administrative Databases for Two Relevant Diseases of the Endocrine System: Diabetes Mellitus and Thyroid Disorders.
Dalla Zuanna T; Pitter G; Canova C; Simonato L; Gnavi R
Epidemiol Prev; 2019; 43(4 Suppl 2):17-36. PubMed ID: 31650804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Studies of Health Insurance Claims Data in Japan: A Scoping Review.
Suto M; Sugiyama T; Imai K; Furuno T; Hosozawa M; Ichinose Y; Ihana-Sugiyama N; Kodama T; Koizumi R; Shimizu-Motohashi Y; Murata S; Nakamura Y; Niino M; Sato M; Taguchi R; Takegami M; Tanaka M; Tsutsumimoto K; Usuda K; Takehara K; Iso H
JMA J; 2023 Jul; 6(3):233-245. PubMed ID: 37560376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol.
Rimland JM; Abraha I; Luchetta ML; Cozzolino F; Orso M; Cherubini A; Dell'Aquila G; Chiatti C; Ambrosio G; Montedori A
BMJ Open; 2016 Jun; 6(6):e011777. PubMed ID: 27251687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validity of ascertainment of co-morbid illness using administrative databases: a systematic review.
Leal JR; Laupland KB
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2010 Jun; 16(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 19614717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Validation of administrative health data for the pediatric population: a scoping review.
Shiff NJ; Jama S; Boden C; Lix LM
BMC Health Serv Res; 2014 May; 14():236. PubMed ID: 24885035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessing the validity of using administrative data to identify patients with epilepsy.
Tu K; Wang M; Jaakkimainen RL; Butt D; Ivers NM; Young J; Green D; Jetté N
Epilepsia; 2014 Feb; 55(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 24417710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validation Study of Diabetes Definitions Using Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Data Among Hospitalized Patients.
Kanehara R; Goto A; Goto M; Takahashi T; Iwasaki M; Noda M; Ihira H; Tsugane S; Sawada N
J Epidemiol; 2023 Apr; 33(4):165-169. PubMed ID: 34275972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Validity of initial cancer diagnoses in the Diagnosis Procedure Combination data in Japan.
Shigemi D; Morishima T; Yamana H; Yasunaga H; Miyashiro I
Cancer Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 74():102016. PubMed ID: 34450452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Methods for systematic reviews of administrative database studies capturing health outcomes of interest.
McPheeters ML; Sathe NA; Jerome RN; Carnahan RM
Vaccine; 2013 Dec; 31 Suppl 10():K2-6. PubMed ID: 24331070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validity of operative information in Japanese administrative data: a chart review-based analysis of 1221 cases at a single institution.
Konishi T; Yoshimoto T; Fujiogi M; Yamana H; Tanabe M; Seto Y; Yasunaga H
Surg Today; 2022 Oct; 52(10):1484-1490. PubMed ID: 35552817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Validity of claims-based algorithms for selected cancers in Japan: Results from the VALIDATE-J study.
de Luise C; Sugiyama N; Morishima T; Higuchi T; Katayama K; Nakamura S; Chen H; Nonnenmacher E; Hase R; Jinno S; Kinjo M; Suzuki D; Tanaka Y; Setoguchi S
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2021 Sep; 30(9):1153-1161. PubMed ID: 33960542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Performance of French medico-administrative databases in epidemiology of infectious diseases: a scoping review.
Tassi MF; le Meur N; Stéfic K; Grammatico-Guillon L
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1161550. PubMed ID: 37250067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Is the Number of National Database Research Studies in Musculoskeletal Sarcoma Increasing, and Are These Studies Reliable?
Lawrenz JM; Johnson SR; Hajdu KS; Chi A; Bendfeldt GA; Kang H; Halpern JL; Holt GE; Schwartz HS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Mar; 481(3):491-508. PubMed ID: 35767810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Review of Research Studies Using Data from the Administrative Claims Databases in Japan.
Fujinaga J; Fukuoka T
Drugs Real World Outcomes; 2022 Dec; 9(4):543-550. PubMed ID: 36107390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy and utility of using administrative healthcare databases to identify people with epilepsy: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mbizvo GK; Bennett K; Simpson CR; Duncan SE; Chin RFM
BMJ Open; 2018 Jun; 8(6):e020824. PubMed ID: 29961014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A systematic review of validated methods to capture acute bronchospasm using administrative or claims data.
Sharifi M; Krishanswami S; McPheeters ML
Vaccine; 2013 Dec; 31 Suppl 10():K12-20. PubMed ID: 24331069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A validated case definition for chronic rhinosinusitis in administrative data: a Canadian perspective.
Rudmik L; Xu Y; Kukec E; Liu M; Dean S; Quan H
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2016 Nov; 6(11):1167-1172. PubMed ID: 27228224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
