114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37146258)
1. Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Parameters in Elderly Patients With Stage III Serous Ovarian Cancer Based on Competing Risk Model.
Sun X; Peng Y; Chen J; Lei J; Liu W; Li Z
Am J Clin Oncol; 2023 Aug; 46(8):337-345. PubMed ID: 37146258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of lymph node ratio on survival in stage III ovarian high-grade serous cancer: a Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
Ayhan A; Ozkan NT; Sarı ME; Celik H; Dede M; Akbayır Ö; Güngördük K; Şahin H; Haberal A; Güngör T; Arvas M; Meydanlı MM
J Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):e12. PubMed ID: 29185270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer with node-positive in a SEER population-based study.
Zhou J; He ZY; Li FY; Sun JY; Lin HX; Wu SG; Chen QH
Oncotarget; 2016 Feb; 7(7):7952-9. PubMed ID: 26788911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Prognostic value of a predictive model comprising preoperative inflammatory response and nutritional indexes in patients with gastric cancer].
Wu LL; Cai MZ; Wang BG; Deng JY; Ke B; Zhang RP; Liang H; Wang XN
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jul; 26(7):680-688. PubMed ID: 37583026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic Involvement of Lymph Node Density in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. A New Predictive Model.
Verde-Sánchez L; Capote AL; Sanz-García A; Brabyn P; Rodríguez-Campo FJ; Naval Gías L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Mar; 81(3):358-369. PubMed ID: 36502856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic impact of examined lymph node count in pT1N0M0 esophageal cancer: A population-based study.
Liu Y; Yang H; Fu H; Li M; Feng Z; Peng Z; Liang Z; Wang H
Thorac Cancer; 2019 Jul; 10(7):1636-1643. PubMed ID: 31237106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The assessment of the optimal number of examined lymph nodes and prognostic models based on lymph nodes for predicting survival outcome in patients with stage N3b gastric cancer.
Guo S; Shang M; Dong Z; Zhang J; Wang Y; Zhao Y
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2021 Apr; 17(2):e117-e124. PubMed ID: 32762113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Pathological staging criteria for carcinoma in the remnant stomach: an exploratory study].
Gao Z; Zhao X; Jiang K; Wang B; Li Y; Ye Y; Wang S
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 May; 21(5):514-521. PubMed ID: 29774932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of three lymph node staging systems in predicting overall survival for gastric cancer patients after radical resection].
Luo C; Zhang G; Wang W; Zhou Z; Zhang J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 19(10):1107-1112. PubMed ID: 27781245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic impact of lymph node status in patients after total pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A strobe-compliant study.
Zheng ZJ; Wang MJ; Tan CL; Chen YH; Ping J; Liu XB
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Feb; 99(8):e19327. PubMed ID: 32080152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
Ataseven B; Grimm C; Harter P; Prader S; Traut A; Heitz F; du Bois A
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Dec; 135(3):435-40. PubMed ID: 25312398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association of Lymph Node Density With Survival of Patients With Papillary Thyroid Cancer.
Amit M; Tam S; Boonsripitayanon M; Cabanillas ME; Busaidy NL; Grubbs EG; Lai SY; Gross ND; Sturgis EM; Zafereo ME
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Feb; 144(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 29192312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between serous and non-serous ovarian cancer as a prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma after primary debulking surgery.
Hosono S; Kajiyama H; Mizuno K; Sakakibara K; Matsuzawa K; Takeda A; Kawai M; Nagasaka T; Kikkawa F
Int J Clin Oncol; 2011 Oct; 16(5):524-32. PubMed ID: 21431342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel nomogram based on LODDS to predict the prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer.
Xu XL; Cheng H; Tang MS; Zhang HL; Wu RY; Yu Y; Li X; Wang XM; Mai J; Yang CL; Jiao L; Li ZL; Zhong ZM; Deng R; Li JD; Zhu XF
Oncotarget; 2017 Jan; 8(5):8120-8130. PubMed ID: 28042955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The number of positive lymph node is a better predictor of survival than the lymph node metastasis status for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A retrospective cohort study.
Zhang X; Lu L; Shang Y; Liu P; Wei Y; Ma L; Gong P
Int J Surg; 2017 Dec; 48():142-148. PubMed ID: 29107188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A nomogram model based on the number of examined lymph nodes-related signature to predict prognosis and guide clinical therapy in gastric cancer.
Li H; Lin D; Yu Z; Li H; Zhao S; Hainisayimu T; Liu L; Wang K
Front Immunol; 2022; 13():947802. PubMed ID: 36405735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contribution of lymph node staging method and prognostic factors in malignant ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors: A world wide database analysis.
Wang J; Li J; Chen R; Lu X
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1054-1061. PubMed ID: 29705285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Factors Affecting Lymph Node Metastasis in Clinical Stage I-II Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.
Erdem B; Yüksel IT; Peker N; Ulukent SC; Aşıcıoğlu O; Özaydin IY; Ülker V; Akbayir O
Oncol Res Treat; 2018; 41(7-8):444-448. PubMed ID: 29975960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Number of positive nodes is superior to the lymph node ratio and American Joint Committee on Cancer N staging for the prognosis of surgically treated head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.
Roberts TJ; Colevas AD; Hara W; Holsinger FC; Oakley-Girvan I; Divi V
Cancer; 2016 May; 122(9):1388-97. PubMed ID: 26969807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Prognostic factors of lymph node-negative metastasis gastric cancer].
Sun D; Xu H; Huang J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 20(2):190-194. PubMed ID: 28226354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
