These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37146317)

  • 21. [Current practice of implant-based breast reconstruction: results from China national practice questionnaire survey].
    Guo R; Xiu BQ; Su YH; Wang J; Zhang Q; Chi WR; Li L; Yang BL; Zhang YY; Cao AY; Shao ZM; Wu J
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 57(8):616-621. PubMed ID: 31422632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ching AH; Lim K; Sze PW; Ooi A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2550-2560. PubMed ID: 35393263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Management of Implant Exposure in One-Stage Breast Reconstruction Using Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh: Sub-Mammary Intercostal Perforator Flap.
    De Riggi MA; Rocco N; Gherardini G; Esposito E; D'Aiuto M
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Dec; 40(6):896-900. PubMed ID: 27766402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy With and Without Acellular Dermal Matrix Among Women With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Johansson H; Roy PG; Brandberg Y; Frisell J
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Oct; 4(10):e2127806. PubMed ID: 34596671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of Prepectoral Implant Placement and Complete Coverage with TiLoop Bra Mesh for Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Study on Long-Term and Patient-Reported BREAST-Q Outcomes.
    Casella D; Di Taranto G; Marcasciano M; Sordi S; Kothari A; Kovacs T; Lo Torto F; Cigna E; Calabrese C; Ribuffo D
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jan; 143(1):1e-9e. PubMed ID: 30303929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Subpectoral versus prepectoral two-stage breast reconstruction: A propensity score-matched analysis of 30-day morbidity and long-term outcomes.
    Escandón JM; Sweitzer K; Christiano JG; Gooch JC; Olzinski AT; Prieto PA; Skinner KA; Langstein HN; Manrique OJ
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Jan; 76():76-87. PubMed ID: 36513014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Immediate breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients with the use of Serasynth and SeragynBR synthetic meshes. Single-oncological center experience, analysis of complications.
    Grous A; Mazur S; Winter P; Kozak K; Jagiello-Gruszfeld A; Napierała M; Nowecki Z
    Pol Przegl Chir; 2023 Oct; 96(2):11-20. PubMed ID: 38629281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
    Dikmans RE; Negenborn VL; Bouman MB; Winters HA; Twisk JW; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MA; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NA; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RR; Ritt MJ; Mullender MG
    Lancet Oncol; 2017 Feb; 18(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 28012977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Impact of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on the Outcomes of Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Awadeen A; Fareed M; Elameen AM
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Feb; 47(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 35879475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: Current concepts].
    Billon R; Hersant B; Bosc R; Meningaud JP
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019 Mar; 47(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30738819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Safety of tissue expander/implant versus autologous abdominal tissue breast reconstruction in postmastectomy breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tsoi B; Ziolkowski NI; Thoma A; Campbell K; O'Reilly D; Goeree R
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Feb; 133(2):234-249. PubMed ID: 24469159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Implant Based Breast Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Matrix: Safety Data From an Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial in the Setting of Breast Cancer Treatment.
    Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Roy PG; Johansson H; Brandberg Y; Eriksen C; Frisell J
    Ann Surg; 2019 May; 269(5):836-841. PubMed ID: 30308615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of Inguinal Hernia Mesh (DynaMesh-ENDOLAP) in Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.
    Omranipour R; Mohammadizavieh M; Alipour S
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Apr; 46(2):677-682. PubMed ID: 34590167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The use of AlloDerm in postmastectomy alloplastic breast reconstruction: part I. A systematic review.
    Jansen LA; Macadam SA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Jun; 127(6):2232-2244. PubMed ID: 21617458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of demographic and perioperative risk factors on complication rates in skin-sparing/nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant-based reconstruction using titanized polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP® Bra).
    Michno V; Malter W; Paepke S; Thill M; Kelling K; Meiré A; Tofall S; Nolte E; Christ H; Eichler C
    Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40():101675. PubMed ID: 34871867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative clinical outcomes of using three-dimensional and TIGR mesh in immediate breast reconstruction surgery for breast cancer patients.
    Karoobi M; Yazd SMM; Nafissi N; Zolnouri M; Khosravi M; Sayad S
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Nov; 86():321-328. PubMed ID: 37826925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Short-term cost-effectiveness of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage expander-implant reconstruction from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
    Negenborn VL; Smit JM; Dikmans REG; Winters HAH; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NAS; van Steveninck-Barends JM; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
    Br J Surg; 2019 Apr; 106(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 30835827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cost-Utility Analysis of Biologic and Biosynthetic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair: When Are They Worth It?
    Schneeberger S; Phillips S; Huang LC; Pierce RA; Etemad SA; Poulose BK
    J Am Coll Surg; 2019 Jan; 228(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 30359837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Current practice and barriers of mesh-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction in China: A nationwide cross-sectional survey of 110 hospitals.
    Guo R; Li L; Su Y; Xiu B; Zhang Q; Wang J; Chi W; Yang B; Zhang Y; Cao A; Shao Z; Wu J
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Jan; 46(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 31519428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Ostapenko E; Nixdorf L; Devyatko Y; Exner R; Wimmer K; Fitzal F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Jan; 30(1):126-136. PubMed ID: 36245049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.