These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37146867)
1. State restrictions on abortion are associated with fewer abortions in patients with high-risk cardiovascular conditions. Abernathy A; Schreiber CA; Srinivas SK Contraception; 2023 Aug; 124():110057. PubMed ID: 37146867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter? Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of Oral and Emergency Contraceptives After the US Supreme Court's Dobbs Decision. Qato DM; Myerson R; Shooshtari A; Guadamuz JS; Alexander GC JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Jun; 7(6):e2418620. PubMed ID: 38922616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of post-Dobbs abortion restrictions on maternal-fetal medicine physicians in the Southeast: a qualitative study. Schultz A; Smith C; Johnson M; Bryant A; Buchbinder M Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Jul; 6(7):101387. PubMed ID: 38772442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The state of abortion rights in the US. Davis MF Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 159(1):324-329. PubMed ID: 35975678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion Provision and Delays to Care in a Clinic Network in Washington State After Dobbs. Riley T; Fiastro AE; Benson LS; Khattar A; Prager S; Godfrey EM JAMA Netw Open; 2024 May; 7(5):e2413847. PubMed ID: 38809551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. State Abortion Policy and Moral Distress Among Clinicians Providing Abortion After the Dobbs Decision. Rivlin K; Bornstein M; Wascher J; Norris Turner A; Norris AH; Howard D JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Aug; 7(8):e2426248. PubMed ID: 39088213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion Policy in the United States: The New Legal Landscape and Its Threats to Health and Socioeconomic Well-Being. Lantz PM; Michelmore K; Moniz MH; Mmeje O; Axinn WG; Spector-Bagdady K Milbank Q; 2023 Apr; 101(S1):283-301. PubMed ID: 36960973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A national analysis of ED presentations for early pregnancy and complications: Implications for post-Roe America. Goodwin G; Marra E; Ramdin C; Alexander AB; Ye PP; Nelson LS; Mazer-Amirshahi M Am J Emerg Med; 2023 Aug; 70():90-95. PubMed ID: 37245403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incarceration Status Among Individuals Obtaining Abortion in the United States, 2020. Kirstein M; Fuentes L; Sufrin C Am J Public Health; 2023 Dec; 113(12):1352-1355. PubMed ID: 37939327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions. Haas-Wilson D J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion Policy: Legal, Clinical, and Medical Education Considerations. Thaxton L; Gonzaga MI; Tristan S Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 66(4):759-772. PubMed ID: 37910072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. State Courts, State Legislatures, and Setting Abortion Policy. Kim JH; Gunderson A; Lane EA; Bauer NM J Health Polit Policy Law; 2023 Aug; 48(4):569-592. PubMed ID: 36693180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of hostile abortion legislation on the United States maternal mortality crisis: a call for increased abortion education. Kheyfets A; Dhaurali S; Feyock P; Khan F; Lockley A; Miller B; Amutah-Onukagha N Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1291668. PubMed ID: 38115843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Projected Health Outcomes Associated With 3 US Supreme Court Decisions in 2022 on COVID-19 Workplace Protections, Handgun-Carry Restrictions, and Abortion Rights. Gaffney A; Himmelstein DU; Dickman S; Myers C; Hemenway D; McCormick D; Woolhandler S JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jun; 6(6):e2315578. PubMed ID: 37289459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Infant Deaths After Texas' 2021 Ban on Abortion in Early Pregnancy. Gemmill A; Margerison CE; Stuart EA; Bell SO JAMA Pediatr; 2024 Aug; 178(8):784-791. PubMed ID: 38913344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion Bans and Resource Utilization for Congenital Heart Disease: A Decision Analysis. Miller HE; Fraz F; Zhang J; Henkel A; Leonard SA; Maskatia SA; El-Sayed YY; Blumenfeld YJ Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Sep; 142(3):652-659. PubMed ID: 37535962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptions of abortion access across the United States prior to the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision: Results from a national survey. Crawford BL; Simmons MK; Turner RC; Lo WJ; Jozkowski KN Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2023 Sep; 55(3):153-164. PubMed ID: 37475195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Impact of New and Renewed Restrictive State Abortion Laws on Pregnancy-Capable People with Diabetes. Sangtani A; Owens L; Broome DT; Gogineni P; Herman WH; Harris LH; Oshman L Curr Diab Rep; 2023 Aug; 23(8):175-184. PubMed ID: 37213059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision. Aiken ARA; Starling JE; Scott JG; Gomperts R JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1768-1770. PubMed ID: 36318139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]