130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37146867)
1. State restrictions on abortion are associated with fewer abortions in patients with high-risk cardiovascular conditions.
Abernathy A; Schreiber CA; Srinivas SK
Contraception; 2023 Aug; 124():110057. PubMed ID: 37146867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?
Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K
JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Provision of Medications for Self-Managed Abortion Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
Aiken ARA; Wells ES; Gomperts R; Scott JG
JAMA; 2024 May; 331(18):1558-1564. PubMed ID: 38526865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of Oral and Emergency Contraceptives After the US Supreme Court's Dobbs Decision.
Qato DM; Myerson R; Shooshtari A; Guadamuz JS; Alexander GC
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Jun; 7(6):e2418620. PubMed ID: 38922616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The state of abortion rights in the US.
Davis MF
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 159(1):324-329. PubMed ID: 35975678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion Provision and Delays to Care in a Clinic Network in Washington State After Dobbs.
Riley T; Fiastro AE; Benson LS; Khattar A; Prager S; Godfrey EM
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 May; 7(5):e2413847. PubMed ID: 38809551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimated Travel Time and Spatial Access to Abortion Facilities in the US Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Decision.
Rader B; Upadhyay UD; Sehgal NKR; Reis BY; Brownstein JS; Hswen Y
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(20):2041-2047. PubMed ID: 36318194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion Policy in the United States: The New Legal Landscape and Its Threats to Health and Socioeconomic Well-Being.
Lantz PM; Michelmore K; Moniz MH; Mmeje O; Axinn WG; Spector-Bagdady K
Milbank Q; 2023 Apr; 101(S1):283-301. PubMed ID: 36960973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of
Herr A
Am J Law Med; 2023 Dec; 49(4):471-492. PubMed ID: 38563269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A national analysis of ED presentations for early pregnancy and complications: Implications for post-Roe America.
Goodwin G; Marra E; Ramdin C; Alexander AB; Ye PP; Nelson LS; Mazer-Amirshahi M
Am J Emerg Med; 2023 Aug; 70():90-95. PubMed ID: 37245403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incarceration Status Among Individuals Obtaining Abortion in the United States, 2020.
Kirstein M; Fuentes L; Sufrin C
Am J Public Health; 2023 Dec; 113(12):1352-1355. PubMed ID: 37939327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
Haas-Wilson D
J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion Policy: Legal, Clinical, and Medical Education Considerations.
Thaxton L; Gonzaga MI; Tristan S
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 66(4):759-772. PubMed ID: 37910072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. State Courts, State Legislatures, and Setting Abortion Policy.
Kim JH; Gunderson A; Lane EA; Bauer NM
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2023 Aug; 48(4):569-592. PubMed ID: 36693180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of hostile abortion legislation on the United States maternal mortality crisis: a call for increased abortion education.
Kheyfets A; Dhaurali S; Feyock P; Khan F; Lockley A; Miller B; Amutah-Onukagha N
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1291668. PubMed ID: 38115843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the
Jozkowski KN; Bueno X; Turner RC; Crawford BL; Lo WJ
Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2023 Dec; 31(1):2233794. PubMed ID: 37565622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Projected Health Outcomes Associated With 3 US Supreme Court Decisions in 2022 on COVID-19 Workplace Protections, Handgun-Carry Restrictions, and Abortion Rights.
Gaffney A; Himmelstein DU; Dickman S; Myers C; Hemenway D; McCormick D; Woolhandler S
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jun; 6(6):e2315578. PubMed ID: 37289459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion Bans and Resource Utilization for Congenital Heart Disease: A Decision Analysis.
Miller HE; Fraz F; Zhang J; Henkel A; Leonard SA; Maskatia SA; El-Sayed YY; Blumenfeld YJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Sep; 142(3):652-659. PubMed ID: 37535962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptions of abortion access across the United States prior to the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision: Results from a national survey.
Crawford BL; Simmons MK; Turner RC; Lo WJ; Jozkowski KN
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2023 Sep; 55(3):153-164. PubMed ID: 37475195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
Aiken ARA; Starling JE; Scott JG; Gomperts R
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1768-1770. PubMed ID: 36318139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
