144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37146897)
1. Conditioned preference and avoidance induced in mice by the rare sugars isomaltulose and allulose.
Sclafani A; Castillo A; Carata I; Pines R; Berglas E; Joseph S; Sarker J; Nashed M; Roland M; Arzayus S; Williams N; Glendinning JI; Bodnar RJ
Physiol Behav; 2023 Aug; 267():114221. PubMed ID: 37146897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.
Sclafani A; Ackroff K
Physiol Behav; 2017 May; 173():188-199. PubMed ID: 28192132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differential fructose and glucose appetition in DBA/2, 129P3 and C57BL/6 × 129P3 hybrid mice revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.
Nashed M; Castillo A; Roland M; Carata I; Berglas E; Pines R; Riaz S; Morisset BJ; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
Physiol Behav; 2021 Nov; 241():113590. PubMed ID: 34509472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
Pinhas A; Aviel M; Koen M; Gurgov S; Acosta V; Israel M; Kakuriev L; Guskova E; Fuzailov I; Touzani K; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
Physiol Behav; 2012 Jan; 105(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 21945373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flavor preference conditioning by different sugars in sweet ageusic Trpm5 knockout mice.
Sclafani A; Ackroff K
Physiol Behav; 2015 Mar; 140():156-63. PubMed ID: 25497884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. BALB/c and SWR inbred mice differ in post-oral fructose appetition as revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.
Kraft TT; Huang D; Lolier M; Warshaw D; LaMagna S; Natanova E; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
Physiol Behav; 2016 Jan; 153():64-9. PubMed ID: 26485292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J Mice Differ in Their Oral and Postoral Attraction to Glucose and Fructose.
Sclafani A; Vural AS; Ackroff K
Chem Senses; 2017 Mar; 42(3):259-267. PubMed ID: 28158517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fructose- and glucose-conditioned preferences in FVB mice: strain differences in post-oral sugar appetition.
Sclafani A; Zukerman S; Ackroff K
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2014 Dec; 307(12):R1448-57. PubMed ID: 25320345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Glucose- vs. Fructose-Associated Conditioned Flavor Preference.
Inui T; Inui-Yamamoto C; Schmid F; Blonde GD; Spector AC
Physiol Behav; 2022 May; 248():113730. PubMed ID: 35149056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gut T1R3 sweet taste receptors do not mediate sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
Sclafani A; Glass DS; Margolskee RF; Glendinning JI
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2010 Dec; 299(6):R1643-50. PubMed ID: 20926763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Post-oral appetite stimulation by sugars and nonmetabolizable sugar analogs.
Zukerman S; Ackroff K; Sclafani A
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2013 Oct; 305(7):R840-53. PubMed ID: 23926132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postoral glucose sensing, not caloric content, determines sugar reward in C57BL/6J mice.
Sclafani A; Zukerman S; Ackroff K
Chem Senses; 2015 May; 40(4):245-58. PubMed ID: 25715333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Operant licking for intragastric sugar infusions: Differential reinforcing actions of glucose, sucrose and fructose in mice.
Sclafani A; Ackroff K
Physiol Behav; 2016 Jan; 153():115-24. PubMed ID: 26485294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Double-dissociation of D1 and opioid receptor antagonism effects on the acquisition of sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in BALB/c and SWR mice.
Dym CT; Kraft TT; Bae VS; Yakubov Y; Touzani K; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2012 Nov; 103(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 22967990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fat and sugar flavor preference and acceptance in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: experience attenuates strain differences.
Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2007 Mar; 90(4):602-11. PubMed ID: 17210165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sugar and fat conditioned flavor preferences in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: oral and postoral interactions.
Sclafani A; Glendinning JI
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2005 Sep; 289(3):R712-20. PubMed ID: 15845881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric glucose but not fructose or galactose in C57BL/6J mice.
Sclafani A; Ackroff K
Physiol Behav; 2012 Jun; 106(4):457-61. PubMed ID: 22445944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric sugar infusions in rats: maltose is more reinforcing than sucrose.
Azzara AV; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 1998 Jun; 64(4):535-41. PubMed ID: 9761229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhanced sucrose and Polycose preference in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice after experience with these saccharides.
Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr; 87(4):745-56. PubMed ID: 16529783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in sweet ageusic T1r3 and Calhm1 knockout mice.
Sclafani A; Marambaud P; Ackroff K
Physiol Behav; 2014 Mar; 126():25-9. PubMed ID: 24384370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
