These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 371476)

  • 1. Laetrile: end play around the FDA. A review of legal developments.
    Rosen GM; Shorr RI
    Ann Intern Med; 1979 Mar; 90(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 371476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laetrile: statutory and constitutional limitations on the regulation of ineffective drugs.
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1978 Nov; 127(1):233-72. PubMed ID: 11661627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laetrile and the FDA: a case of reverse regulation.
    Cannizzaro JF; Rosenfeld MM
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1978; 3(2):181-95. PubMed ID: 357475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laetrile's message to the FDA.
    Spivak J
    Wall St J (East Ed); 1977 Jul; ():12. PubMed ID: 11649063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laetrile--of choice and effectiveness.
    Cooper RM
    Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1983 Oct; 38(4):417-40. PubMed ID: 16100796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Paternalism and the regulation of drugs.
    Sagoff M
    Int J Appl Philos; 1984; 2(2):43-57. PubMed ID: 11653068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laetrile: the political success of a scientific failure.
    Consum Rep; 1977 Aug; 42(8):444-7. PubMed ID: 10297037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utility, autonomy and drug regulation.
    Scriven T
    Int J Appl Philos; 1984; 2(2):27-42. PubMed ID: 11653067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Laetrile controversy: freedom of choice in medicines urged.
    Link M
    Congr Q Wkly Rep; 1977 Jul; 35(27):1346-8. PubMed ID: 11661613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Freedom of choice in medical treatment: reconsidering the efficacy requirement of the FDCA.
    Clinite BJ
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1977; 9(1):205-26. PubMed ID: 11661566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Administrative law... Laetrile and other drugs to be used by the terminally ill are not exempt from the safety and effectiveness requirements of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938.
    Shishkovsky KR
    J Urban Law; 1980; 57(2):364-88. PubMed ID: 11662840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Supreme Court enters quarrel over Laetrile.
    Mintz M
    Washington Post; 1979 Jan; ():A1+. PubMed ID: 11648744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laetrile in historical perspective.
    Young JH
    Conn Med; 1979 Aug; 43(8):497-500. PubMed ID: 399880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laetrile: a survey of judicial and administrative activity.
    Rosen GM; Shorr RI
    Ann Intern Med; 1981 Apr; 94(4 pt 1):530-3. PubMed ID: 7011142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. People v. Privitera: the right to prescribe and use Laetrile.
    Brandt EK
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1978; 5(2):201-229. PubMed ID: 11661590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laetrile: individual choice for cancer patients.
    Block RE
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1978; 7(2):313-34. PubMed ID: 11661706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laetrile and the privacy right in decisional responsibility.
    Volzer HJ
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1980; 27(4):395-429. PubMed ID: 11662802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rutherford v. United States. 5 Dec 1977.
    U.S. District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
    Fed Suppl; 1977; 438():1287-302. PubMed ID: 11645965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Evolution of Federal Regulation of Human Drugs in the United States: An Historical Essay.
    Hutt PB
    Am J Law Med; 2018 May; 44(2-3):403-451. PubMed ID: 30106657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The uncertain application of the right of privacy in personal medical decisions: the Laetrile cases.
    Christensen J
    Ohio State Law J; 1981; 42(2):523-50. PubMed ID: 11649547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.