These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37148677)

  • 1. Human and machine drivers: Sharing control, sharing responsibility.
    Zhai S; Wang L; Liu P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107096. PubMed ID: 37148677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Drivers of partially automated vehicles are blamed for crashes that they cannot reasonably avoid.
    Beckers N; Siebert LC; Bruijnes M; Jonker C; Abbink D
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):16193. PubMed ID: 36171437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blame Attribution Asymmetry in Human-Automation Cooperation.
    Liu P; Du Y
    Risk Anal; 2022 Aug; 42(8):1769-1783. PubMed ID: 33442934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristics of Single Vehicle Crashes with a Teen Driver in South Carolina, 2005-2008.
    Shults RA; Bergen G; Smith TJ; Cook L; Kindelberger J; West B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jan; 122():325-331. PubMed ID: 28947072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.
    Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advancing investigation of automated vehicle crashes using text analytics of crash narratives and Bayesian analysis.
    Lee S; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Mar; 181():106932. PubMed ID: 36580765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical implications of using moving violations to determine crash responsibility in young driver crashes.
    Curry AE; Pfeiffer MR; Myers RK; Durbin DR; Elliott MR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Apr; 65():28-35. PubMed ID: 24398139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rage against the machine? Google's self-driving cars versus human drivers.
    Teoh ER; Kidd DG
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():57-60. PubMed ID: 29203024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of quasi-induced exposure representativeness assumption among young drivers.
    Curry AE; Pfeiffer MR; Elliott MR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 May; 17(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 26376230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is vehicle automation enough to prevent crashes? Role of traffic operations in automated driving environments for traffic safety.
    Jeong E; Oh C; Lee S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():115-124. PubMed ID: 28499140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Who is to blame for crashes involving autonomous vehicles? Exploring blame attribution across the road transport system.
    Pöllänen E; Read GJM; Lane BR; Thompson J; Salmon PM
    Ergonomics; 2020 May; 63(5):525-537. PubMed ID: 32180531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving.
    Lin Q; Li S; Ma X; Lu G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105543. PubMed ID: 32485431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-agent traffic simulations to estimate the impact of automated technologies on safety.
    Kitajima S; Shimono K; Tajima J; Antona-Makoshi J; Uchida N
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S58-S64. PubMed ID: 31381431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distraction impairs drivers of all ages: A cross-sectional analysis of fatal crashes in the United States.
    Marchese C; Dubois S; Martin L; Weaver B; Bédard M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(8):465-470. PubMed ID: 36166732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Responsibility of drivers, by age and gender, for motor-vehicle crash deaths.
    Williams AF; Shabanova VI
    J Safety Res; 2003; 34(5):527-31. PubMed ID: 14733986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Critical older driver errors in a national sample of serious U.S. crashes.
    Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jul; 80():211-9. PubMed ID: 25916662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of the effect of Ohio's graduated driver licensing law on motor vehicle crashes and crash outcomes involving drivers 16 to 20 years of age.
    Conner KA; Smith GA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(4):344-350. PubMed ID: 27588739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of teen and adult driver crash scenarios in a nationally representative sample of serious crashes.
    McDonald CC; Curry AE; Kandadai V; Sommers MS; Winston FK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():302-8. PubMed ID: 25103321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Driver injury severity outcome analysis in rural interstate highway crashes: a two-level Bayesian logistic regression interpretation.
    Chen C; Zhang G; Liu XC; Ci Y; Huang H; Ma J; Chen Y; Guan H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():69-78. PubMed ID: 27591415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crash comparison of autonomous and conventional vehicles using pre-crash scenario typology.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Wu X; Glaser Y; He L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106281. PubMed ID: 34273622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.