154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37149906)
1. Survival outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fu H; Zhang J; Zhao S; He N
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jul; 174():55-67. PubMed ID: 37149906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.
Galaal K; Donkers H; Bryant A; Lopes AD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 10(10):CD006655. PubMed ID: 30379327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.
Galaal K; Bryant A; Fisher AD; Al-Khaduri M; Kew F; Lopes AD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD006655. PubMed ID: 22972096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparotomy for infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: A randomised controlled trial.
Salehi S; Åvall-Lundqvist E; Legerstam B; Carlson JW; Falconer H
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 79():81-89. PubMed ID: 28463759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: single-center, retrospective, propensity score analyses.
Mazaki J; Ishizaki T; Kuboyama Y; Udo R; Tago T; Kasahara K; Yamada T; Nagakawa Y
J Robot Surg; 2024 Apr; 18(1):157. PubMed ID: 38568362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic treatment of endometrial cancer: systematic review.
He H; Zeng D; Ou H; Tang Y; Li J; Zhong H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):413-23. PubMed ID: 23506718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center.
Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Tomioka H; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y
Surg Today; 2016 Aug; 46(8):957-62. PubMed ID: 26482845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic and laparoscopic gynaecological surgery: a prospective multicentre observational cohort study and economic evaluation in England.
McCarthy A; Samarakoon D; Gray J; Mcmeekin P; McCarthy S; Newton C; Nobbenhuis M; Lippiatt J; Twigg J
BMJ Open; 2023 Sep; 13(9):e073990. PubMed ID: 37770262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-assisted surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xie W; Cao D; Yang J; Shen K; Zhao L
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2016 Oct; 142(10):2173-83. PubMed ID: 27217038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.
Leitao MM; Malhotra V; Briscoe G; Suidan R; Dholakiya P; Santos K; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Sonoda Y; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR; Gardner GJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(11):3561-7. PubMed ID: 23797751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.
Yamanashi T; Miura H; Tanaka T; Watanabe A; Goto T; Yokoi K; Kojo K; Niihara M; Hosoda K; Kaizu T; Yamashita K; Sato T; Kumamoto Y; Hiki N; Naitoh T
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Oct; 15(4):753-764. PubMed ID: 35555973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis of robotic gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in terms of their long-term oncological outcomes: a meta-analysis of 3410 gastric cancer patients.
Liao G; Zhao Z; Khan M; Yuan Y; Li X
World J Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 17(1):86. PubMed ID: 31122260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Creatine kinase elevation after robotic surgery for rectal cancer due to a prolonged lithotomy position.
Tsuchiya Y; Munakata S; Tsukamoto R; Okazawa Y; Mizukoshi K; Sugimoto K; Takahashi M; Tomiki YKY; Sakamoto K
BMC Surg; 2020 Jun; 20(1):136. PubMed ID: 32546155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term quality of life after comprehensive surgical staging of high-risk endometrial cancer - results from the RASHEC trial.
Salehi S; Brandberg Y; Åvall-Lundqvist E; Suzuki C; Johansson H; Legerstam B; Falconer H
Acta Oncol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):1671-1676. PubMed ID: 30289327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery in high-risk endometrial cancer.
Koskas M; Jozwiak M; Fournier M; Vergote I; Trum H; Lok C; Amant F
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Sep; 65():185-91. PubMed ID: 27505629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Yang Y; Wang F; Zhang P; Shi C; Zou Y; Qin H; Ma Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 19(12):3727-36. PubMed ID: 22752371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility and surgical outcomes of conventional and robot-assisted laparoscopy for early-stage ovarian cancer: a retrospective, multicenter analysis.
Bellia A; Vitale SG; Laganà AS; Cannone F; Houvenaeghel G; Rua S; Ladaique A; Jauffret C; Ettore G; Lambaudie E
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 27040423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparison of Survival and Recurrence Outcomes in Patients With Endometrial Cancer Undergoing Robotic Versus Open Surgery.
Park HK; Helenowski IB; Berry E; Lurain JR; Neubauer NL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):961-7. PubMed ID: 25922108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
