144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37149913)
1. Analysis of online materials regarding DIEP and TRAM flap autologous breast reconstruction.
Bruce JC; Batchinsky M; Van Spronsen NR; Sinha I; Bharadia D
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Jul; 82():81-91. PubMed ID: 37149913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.
Chevray PM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Chun YS; Sinha I; Turko A; Yueh JH; Lipsitz S; Pribaz JJ; Lee BT
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 20555301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Comparison of Four Abdominally Based Autologous Reconstruction Methods.
Macadam SA; Zhong T; Weichman K; Papsdorf M; Lennox PA; Hazen A; Matros E; Disa J; Mehrara B; Pusic AL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):758-771. PubMed ID: 26910656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Aesthetic Outcomes Between Vertical and Horizontal Flap Insets in Breast Reconstruction with the TRAM or DIEP Flaps.
Jeong WS; Han W; Eom JS
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2017 Feb; 41(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 28032178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Is there a psychological and physiological difference between DIEP- and free TRAM-flap? A retrospective patient survey].
Wurzer P; Spendel S; Kamolz LP; Parvizi D; Tuca A; Rappl T
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2014 Aug; 46(4):256-62. PubMed ID: 25162244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.
Erdmann-Sager J; Wilkins EG; Pusic AL; Qi J; Hamill JB; Kim HM; Guldbrandsen GE; Chun YS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Feb; 141(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 29019862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A cost-effectiveness analysis of DIEP vs free MS-TRAM flap for microsurgical breast reconstruction.
Tan MG; Isaranuwatchai W; DeLyzer T; Butler K; Hofer SOP; O'Neill AC; Zhong T
J Surg Oncol; 2019 Mar; 119(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 30562406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lee KT; Mun GH
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 25536199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Double pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction.
Agarwal JP; Gottlieb LJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Apr; 58(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 17413875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The value of microvascular breast reconstruction: Cost equivalence of TRAM and DIEP flaps implications in the era of CMS reforms.
Foppiani JA; Hernandez Alvarez A; Kim EJ; Escobar-Domingo MJ; Taritsa IC; Schuster KA; Lee D; Ho OA; Rinker B; Lee BT; Lin SJ
Microsurgery; 2024 May; 44(4):e31185. PubMed ID: 38716656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Outcomes following Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using the DIEP and Pedicled TRAM Flaps: A 12-Year Clinical Retrospective Study and Literature Review.
Knox ADC; Ho AL; Leung L; Tashakkor AY; Lennox PA; Van Laeken N; Macadam SA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Jul; 138(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26267400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving outcomes in microsurgical breast reconstruction: lessons learnt from 406 consecutive DIEP/TRAM flaps performed by a single surgeon.
Damen TH; Morritt AN; Zhong T; Ahmad J; Hofer SO
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Aug; 66(8):1032-8. PubMed ID: 23642795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis of flap perfusion and donor site complications for breast reconstruction using pedicled versus free TRAM and DIEP flaps.
Jeong W; Lee S; Kim J
Breast; 2018 Apr; 38():45-51. PubMed ID: 29227815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction in patients with prior abdominal contouring procedures.
Jandali S; Nelson JA; Wu LC; Serletti JM
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2010 Nov; 26(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 20922654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rezoning Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flaps Based on Perforasome Groupings and a New Understanding of the Vascular Architecture of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery-Based Flaps.
Tan J; Ohjimi H; Takagi S; Kawakami Y; Eto A
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Dec; 83(6):e59-e67. PubMed ID: 31232810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is Unipedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Obsolete Owing to Superiority of DIEP Flap?
Leyngold MM
Ann Plast Surg; 2018 Jun; 80(6S Suppl 6):S418-S420. PubMed ID: 29369109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Autologous Breast Reconstruction with Transverse Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous (TRAM) or Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) Flaps: An Analysis of the 100 Most Cited Articles.
Cai A; Suckau J; Arkudas A; Beier JP; Momeni A; Horch RE
Med Sci Monit; 2019 May; 25():3520-3536. PubMed ID: 31079136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Muscle-sparing TRAM flap does not protect breast reconstruction from postmastectomy radiation damage compared with the DIEP flap.
Garvey PB; Clemens MW; Hoy AE; Smith B; Zhang H; Kronowitz SJ; Butler CE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Feb; 133(2):223-233. PubMed ID: 24469158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Secondary breast reconstruction after mastectomy using the DIEP flap.
Hauck T; Horch RE; Schmitz M; Arkudas A
Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):513. PubMed ID: 30217311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
