130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37150077)
1. ProbRank: An efficient DNA database search method for complex mixtures per a quantitative likelihood ratio model.
Hoogenboom J; Sijen T; Benschop C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102884. PubMed ID: 37150077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of SmartRank: A likelihood ratio software for searching national DNA databases with complex DNA profiles.
Benschop CCG; van de Merwe L; de Jong J; Vanvooren V; Kempenaers M; Kees van der Beek CP; Barni F; Reyes EL; Moulin L; Pene L; Haned H; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():145-153. PubMed ID: 28441635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DNAxs/DNAStatistX: Development and validation of a software suite for the data management and probabilistic interpretation of DNA profiles.
Benschop CCG; Hoogenboom J; Hovers P; Slagter M; Kruise D; Parag R; Steensma K; Slooten K; Nagel JHA; Dieltjes P; van Marion V; van Paassen H; de Jong J; Creeten C; Sijen T; Kneppers ALJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():81-89. PubMed ID: 31254947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification of forensic genetic evidence: Comparison of results obtained by qualitative and quantitative software for real casework samples.
Costa C; Figueiredo C; Amorim A; Costa S; Ferreira PM; Pinto N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102715. PubMed ID: 35490558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of a top-down DNA profile analysis for database searching using a fully continuous probabilistic genotyping model.
Taylor D; Bright JA; Scandrett L; Abarno D; Lee SI; Wivell R; Kelly H; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102479. PubMed ID: 33588348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An assessment of the performance of the probabilistic genotyping software EuroForMix: Trends in likelihood ratios and analysis of Type I & II errors.
Benschop CCG; Nijveld A; Duijs FE; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():31-38. PubMed ID: 31212207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of likelihood ratios obtained from EuroForMix and STRmix™.
Cheng K; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Curran J; Bright JA; Taylor D; Buckleton J
J Forensic Sci; 2021 Nov; 66(6):2138-2155. PubMed ID: 34553371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model.
Haned H; Benschop CCG; Gill PD; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():17-25. PubMed ID: 25485478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Familial searching on DNA mixtures with dropout.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():128-138. PubMed ID: 26905597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Likelihood Ratio Calculation Using LRmix Studio.
Foley MM
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2685():307-328. PubMed ID: 37439990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Probabilistic approaches to interpreting two-person DNA mixtures from post-coital specimens.
Rodriguez JJRB; Bright JA; Salvador JM; Laude RP; De Ungria MCA
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():157-163. PubMed ID: 31112838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A mixed DNA profile controversy revisited.
Kalafut T; Pugh S; Gill P; Abbas S; Semaan M; Mansour I; Curran J; Bright JA; Hicks T; Wivell R; Buckleton J
J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jan; 67(1):128-135. PubMed ID: 34651300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Open source software EuroForMix can be used to analyse complex SNP mixtures.
Bleka Ø; Eduardoff M; Santos C; Phillips C; Parson W; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Nov; 31():105-110. PubMed ID: 28942111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and validation of open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation based on a quantitative continuous model.
Manabe S; Morimoto C; Hamano Y; Fujimoto S; Tamaki K
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188183. PubMed ID: 29149210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel computational strategy to predict the value of the evidence in the SNP-based forensic mixtures.
Pascali VL
PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0247344. PubMed ID: 34653182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of a probabilistic genotyping software to MPS mixture STR data is supported by similar trends in LRs compared with CE data.
Benschop CCG; van der Gaag KJ; de Vreede J; Backx AJ; de Leeuw RH; Zuñiga S; Hoogenboom J; de Knijff P; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102489. PubMed ID: 33677249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
