These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37150077)

  • 41. DNA mixtures interpretation - A proof-of-concept multi-software comparison highlighting different probabilistic methods' performances on challenging samples.
    Alladio E; Omedei M; Cisana S; D'Amico G; Caneparo D; Vincenti M; Garofano P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():143-150. PubMed ID: 30173123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Statistefix 4.0: A novel probabilistic software tool.
    Schmidt M; Schiller R; Anslinger K; Wiegand P; Weirich V
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Nov; 55():102570. PubMed ID: 34474323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Low template STR typing: effect of replicate number and consensus method on genotyping reliability and DNA database search results.
    Benschop CC; van der Beek CP; Meiland HC; van Gorp AG; Westen AA; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):316-28. PubMed ID: 20655289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A comparative study of qualitative and quantitative models used to interpret complex STR DNA profiles.
    Bleka Ø; Benschop CCG; Storvik G; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():85-96. PubMed ID: 27529774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Probabilistic genotyping of single cell replicates from complex DNA mixtures recovers higher contributor LRs than standard analysis.
    Huffman K; Hanson E; Ballantyne J
    Sci Justice; 2022 Mar; 62(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 35277229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of FBI CODIS Core STR Loci expansion on familial DNA database searching.
    Karantzali E; Rosmaraki P; Kotsakis A; Le Roux-Le Pajolec MG; Fitsialos G
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102129. PubMed ID: 31476659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Facilitating complex DNA mixture interpretation by sequencing highly polymorphic haplotypes.
    Voskoboinik L; Motro U; Darvasi A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():136-140. PubMed ID: 29775859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of samples comprising minute amounts of DNA.
    Benschop CC; Haned H; Yoo SY; Sijen T
    Sci Justice; 2015 Sep; 55(5):316-22. PubMed ID: 26385713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Inferring the Number of Contributors to Complex DNA Mixtures Using Three Methods: Exploring the Limits of Low-Template DNA Interpretation.
    Alfonse LE; Tejada G; Swaminathan H; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27907229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Interpreting a major component from a mixed DNA profile with an unknown number of minor contributors.
    Bille T; Weitz S; Buckleton JS; Bright JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():150-159. PubMed ID: 30844683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. RFU derived LRs for activity level assignments using Bayesian Networks.
    Gill P; Bleka Ø; Fonneløp AE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jan; 56():102608. PubMed ID: 34735938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Validation of Probabilistic Genotyping Software for Single Cell STR Analysis.
    Huffman K; Ballantyne J
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The effect of wild card designations and rare alleles in forensic DNA database searches.
    Tvedebrink T; Bright JA; Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():98-104. PubMed ID: 25576850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
    Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Massively parallel sequencing analysis of nondegraded and degraded DNA mixtures using the ForenSeq™ system in combination with EuroForMix software.
    Hwa HL; Wu MY; Chung WC; Ko TM; Lin CP; Yin HI; Lee TT; Lee JC
    Int J Legal Med; 2019 Jan; 133(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 30374565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Using big data from probabilistic genotyping to solve crime.
    Taylor D; Abarno D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Mar; 57():102631. PubMed ID: 34861631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Identifying contributors of two-person DNA mixtures by familial database search.
    Chung YK; Fung WK
    Int J Legal Med; 2013 Jan; 127(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 22270047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset.
    Riman S; Iyer H; Vallone PM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0256714. PubMed ID: 34534241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A top-down approach to DNA mixtures.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102250. PubMed ID: 32169810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A sensitivity analysis to determine the robustness of STRmix™ with respect to laboratory calibration.
    Kelly H; Bright JA; Kruijver M; Cooper S; Taylor D; Duke K; Strong M; Beamer V; Buettner C; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():113-122. PubMed ID: 29727813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.