These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37150816)

  • 1. Patient experience and repeatability of measurements made with the Pentacam HR in patients with keratoconus.
    Gustafsson I; Bizios D; Ivarsen A; Hjortdal JØ
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 23(1):201. PubMed ID: 37150816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repeatability and Comparison of Corneal Tomography in Mild to Severe Keratoconus Between the Anterior Segment OCT MS-39 and Pentacam HR.
    Seiler TG; Mueller M; Mendes Baiao T
    J Refract Surg; 2022 Apr; 38(4):250-255. PubMed ID: 35412926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Interday Repeatability of Parameters for the Assessment of Progressive Disease in Subjects With Less Advanced Keratoconus.
    Gustafsson I; Bergström A; Cardiakides A; Ivarsen A; Hjortdal JØ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 May; 225():38-46. PubMed ID: 33422466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential precision of corneal Pentacam HR measurements in early and advanced keratoconus.
    Flynn TH; Sharma DP; Bunce C; Wilkins MR
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 100(9):1183-7. PubMed ID: 26659714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeatability and Agreement of Orbscan II, Pentacam HR, and Galilei Tomography Systems in Corneas With Keratoconus.
    Meyer JJ; Gokul A; Vellara HR; Prime Z; McGhee CN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar; 175():122-128. PubMed ID: 27993593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeatability of the Pentacam HR in Various Grades of Keratoconus.
    Kreps EO; Jimenez-Garcia M; Issarti I; Claerhout I; Koppen C; Rozema JJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 219():154-162. PubMed ID: 32569740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Characteristics of corneal topography in parents of keratoconus patients].
    Li J; Jing LL; Du XL
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 56(6):456-464. PubMed ID: 32842328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of keratoconus grades on repeatability of keratometry readings: Comparison of 5 devices.
    Hashemi H; Yekta A; Khabazkhoob M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 May; 41(5):1065-72. PubMed ID: 26049838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An inter-day assessment of the ABC parameters in the evaluation of progressive keratoconus.
    Gustafsson I; Faxén T; Vicente A; Bergström A; Ivarsen A; Hjortdal JØ
    Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):16037. PubMed ID: 34362986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association between keratoconus disease severity and repeatability in measurements of parameters for the assessment of progressive disease.
    Gustafsson I; Bergström A; Myers AC; Ivarsen A; Hjortdal J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228992. PubMed ID: 32059036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeatability and reliability of ectasia display and topometric indices with the Scheimpflug system in normal and keratoconic eyes.
    Kosekahya P; Koc M; Caglayan M; Kiziltoprak H; Atilgan CU; Yilmazbas P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 Jan; 44(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 29502620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Belin ABCD Progression Display Identifies Keratoconus Progression Earlier Than Conventional Metrics.
    Ozalp O; Atalay E
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2022 Apr; 236():45-52. PubMed ID: 34653352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pentacam HR criteria for curvature change in keratoconus and postoperative LASIK ectasia.
    Epstein RL; Chiu YL; Epstein GL
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Dec; 28(12):890-4. PubMed ID: 23231740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of classifying keratoconus location based on keratometry or pachymetry on progression parameters.
    Bardan AS; Kubrak-Kisza M; Kisza KJ; Nanavaty MA
    Clin Exp Optom; 2020 May; 103(3):312-319. PubMed ID: 31184397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Superiority of Baseline Biomechanical Properties over Corneal Tomography in Predicting Keratoconus Progression.
    Erol MA; Atalay E; Özalp O; Divarcı A; Yıldırım N
    Turk J Ophthalmol; 2021 Oct; 51(5):257-264. PubMed ID: 34702018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scleral shape and its correlation with corneal parameters in keratoconus.
    Dhaese SE; Kreps EO; Consejo A
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2021 Aug; 44(4):101366. PubMed ID: 32938544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Keratoconus Cone Location of Different Topo/tomographical Parameters.
    Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Azimi Khorasani A; Belin MW; Monfared N; Wolffsohn JS; Pakdel M; Farrokh Ghate M; Hemmatian Z
    Curr Eye Res; 2021 Nov; 46(11):1666-1672. PubMed ID: 33998941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of corneal elevation, pachymetry and keratometry in keratoconic eyes with respect to the stage of Amsler-Krumeich classification.
    Kamiya K; Ishii R; Shimizu K; Igarashi A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 98(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 24457362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of corneal measurements in normal and keratoconus eyes using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT) and Pentacam HR topographer.
    Said OM; Kamal M; Tawfik S; Saif ATS
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 23(1):194. PubMed ID: 37138239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Keratoconus and corneal morphology in patients with Down syndrome at a pediatric hospital.
    Imbornoni LM; Wise RE; Taravella MJ; Hickey F; McCourt EA
    J AAPOS; 2020 Jun; 24(3):140.e1-140.e5. PubMed ID: 32473288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.