134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37152501)
1. Is the computed tomography exam important for planning mini-implant installation?
Rodrigues ES; Mordente CM; Rodrigues LG; Lima IA; Miranda DA; Zenóbio EG; Manzi FR
J Clin Exp Dent; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e298-e303. PubMed ID: 37152501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of mini-implant sites in the posterior maxilla using traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography.
Abbassy MA; Sabban HM; Hassan AH; Zawawi KH
Saudi Med J; 2015 Nov; 36(11):1336-41. PubMed ID: 26593168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study between currently used methods and Small Volume-Cone Beam Tomography for surgical placement of mini implants.
Landin M; Jadhav A; Yadav S; Tadinada A
Angle Orthod; 2015 May; 85(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 25343688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-dimensional radiographs versus cone-beam computed tomography in planning mini-implant placement: A systematic review.
Caetano GR; Soares MQ; Oliveira LB; Junqueira JL; Nascimento MC
J Clin Exp Dent; 2022 Aug; 14(8):e669-e677. PubMed ID: 36046172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study.
Kalra S; Tripathi T; Rai P; Kanase A
Prog Orthod; 2014 Nov; 15(1):61. PubMed ID: 25406652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tomographic mapping of mandibular interradicular spaces for placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
Monnerat C; Restle L; Mucha JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):428.e1-9; discussion 428-9. PubMed ID: 19361724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of bone quality, implant type, and implantation site preparation on insertion torques of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
Wilmes B; Drescher D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(7):697-703. PubMed ID: 21458232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reasons for mini-implants failure: choosing installation site should be valued!
Consolaro A; Romano FL
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):18-24. PubMed ID: 24945511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Interdental Spaces of the Mandibular Posterior Area for Orthodontic Mini-Implants with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Moslemzadeh SH; Sohrabi A; Rafighi A; Kananizadeh Y; Nourizadeh A
J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Apr; 11(4):ZC09-ZC12. PubMed ID: 28571251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinical outcome evaluation of midpalatal mini-implant anchorage system in orthodontic treatment].
Pan YC; Zhao JH
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2014 Dec; 46(6):969-74. PubMed ID: 25512294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of Insertion Torque of Mini-implant and Its Correlation with Primary Stability and Pain Levels in Orthodontic Patients.
Sreenivasagan S; Subramanian AK; Nivethigaa B
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jan; 22(1):84-88. PubMed ID: 34002715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Orthodontic Patients on Immediate Inflammatory Response After Mini-Implants Insertion: A Preliminary Report.
Yanaguizawa MS; Suzuki SS; Martinez EF; Suzuki H; Pelegrin MC; Garcez AS
Photomed Laser Surg; 2017 Jan; 35(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 27813716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Temporary anchorage device usage: a survey among Swiss orthodontists.
Markic G; Katsaros C; Pandis N; Eliades T
Prog Orthod; 2014 Apr; 15(1):29. PubMed ID: 24935644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of median and paramedian regions for planning palatal mini-implants: a study in vivo using cone beam computed tomography.
de Rezende Barbosa GL; Ramírez-Sotelo LR; Távora DM; Almeida SM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 43(10):1265-8. PubMed ID: 24846198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults.
Nucera R; Lo Giudice A; Bellocchio AM; Spinuzza P; Caprioglio A; Perillo L; Matarese G; Cordasco G
Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):745-751. PubMed ID: 28598220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of mini-implant displacement using cone beam computed tomography.
Alves M; Baratieri C; Nojima LI
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Oct; 22(10):1151-1156. PubMed ID: 21303419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed tomographic characterization of mini-implant placement pattern and maximum anchorage force in human cadavers.
Lemieux G; Hart A; Cheretakis C; Goodmurphy C; Trexler S; McGary C; Retrouvey JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 21889080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is there an ideal insertion angle and position for orthodontic mini-implants in the anterior palate? A CBCT study in humans.
Becker K; Unland J; Wilmes B; Tarraf NE; Drescher D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Sep; 156(3):345-354. PubMed ID: 31474264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of orthodontic mini-implants placed at the anterior palate by tooth-borne or gingiva-borne guide support: a cadaveric study.
Möhlhenrich SC; Brandt M; Kniha K; Prescher A; Hölzle F; Modabber A; Wolf M; Peters F
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Dec; 23(12):4425-4431. PubMed ID: 30982181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of insertion torque and surface integrity of zirconia-coated titanium mini screw implants.
Giri M; Sabapathy K; Govindasamy B; Rajamurugan H
J World Fed Orthod; 2020 Mar; 9(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 32672662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
